Conceptual Model. 5.1 Point source waste discharges
Conceptual Model. ESAP, in and of itself, provides no compute or analysis capabilities (beyond a simple ability to view tabular data and preview images). Rather, it acts as a broker between users and the various query and analysis services which are available to them. These might include, for example: • bulk data query systems, which can help the user locate and access data files (images, visibility data, etc) in archives, data lakes, or similar bulk storage systems; • tabular data query systems, which can help the user find relevant entries in source catalogues and similar relational systems; • Interactive Data Analysis (XXX) systems, which provide the user compute and visualization tools in a convenient environment with access to relevant datasets (for example, a Jupyter [7] notebook, or con‐ tainerized analysis application); • bulk data processing systems, which provide batch (non‐interactive) processing of data at‐scale in HPC or HTC environments; • scientific software repositories, which provide access to specialist analysis tools and workflows; A given instance of ESAP is configured with information about available services1. When a user connects, the ESAP instance should: • help the user select services which are relevant to them (for example, by clearly presenting the available services; by making clear what science cases those services support, by taking account of the user’s access privileges, etc); • facilitate authentication and authorization with the various services, as necessary; • provide a consistent and convenient way for the user to access services (for example, by providing the user with a single way to enter a particular query, and then automatically translating that to the requirements of each individual service); • mediate data flow between services (for example, by enabling the user to locate data with an archive query, dispatch the data to the processing facility, and schedule processing of the data on a bulk data processing system). This relationship is illustrated schematically in Fig. 1: this shows the end user communicating directly with ESAP, which mediates their interactions with a range of other services, deployed across a variety of different infrastructures. Note that the user communicates with a single ESAP instance, while that instance mediates interactions with a range of different services from a variety of infrastructure providers.
Conceptual Model. The AIXM Conceptual Model is the component of the AIXM data standard that provides a conceptual model of aeronautical data. It models the important features, properties (attributes and associations) and business rules that make up aeronautical information. As such, it can be used as the basis for the design of an AIM database. The model is designed using the Unified Modelling Language (UML). Mapping summaries covering ADC to AIXM 5 mappings can be found at: xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/aixm_confluence/display/ACGAIP/%5BExcel%5D+Data+Catalogue +Mapping+Summary Mappings of the PANS-AIM AIP Data Set to AIXM 5 can be found at xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/aixm_confluence/display/ACGAIP/Mapping+PANS- AIM+AIP+Data+Set+to+AIXM+5 Example 4:
Conceptual Model. 2. When transmitting Data to the Data Receiver, the following means/methods/tools shall be applied: [describe the agreed data transmission means] • Tools/method used • Access details e.g. authentication, credentials • Training or documentation • Etc.
Conceptual Model. Description of the effects that stressors have on the ecological components in the environment and the relationship with assessment endpoints. We have conducted an ecological risk assessment of the marine environment of Port Xxxxxx, Alaska. Concerns about the environmental consequences of present and proposed activities in Port Valdez and about potential conflicts and incompatibilities among those activities have grown with development of the Port. These concerns led to an awareness that environmental management of Port Valdez is a complex task which can best be approached in a unified way. The Prince Xxxxxxx Sound Regional Citizens' Advisory Council (RCAC) and the Alyeska Pipeline Service Company (APSC) have sponsored this regional ecological risk assessment to provide a factual basis for comparing the various environmental risks which must be managed in the Port. This risk assessment was not performed in response to any specific regulatory action or policy decision. Rather it was intended to improve environmental management of Port Valdez by analyzing and ranking the various kinds of ecological risks from human activity in the Port. The resulting assessment was broad in scope and required the extension of the risk analysis paradigm to allow comparative risk assessment on a regional basis. The assessment relied on input from stakeholders through public meetings in Valdez, comments on preliminary drafts of this report, meetings with the principal stakeholders (RCAC, APSC, and state and federal regulatory agencies), and individual conversations with stakeholders, environmental scientists, and other knowledgeable individuals. Following an introduction and description of methods, this report contains a detailed description of the Port Valdez marine environment (Sec. 3) based on data and technical information available in 1996. Section 4 describes the chosen assessment endpoints, those environmental features to which the assessment estimates risk. The report presents a conceptual model and its results in Sec. 5 and 6. The conceptual model depicts the set of relationships and procedures by which relative risk has been ranked in Port Valdez. In Sec. 7 we present information about widely accepted measures of environmental risk for some chemicals in the Port. This information serves to associate some of the relative risks ranked by the conceptual model with "acceptable" levels of environmental risk. Sections 8 and 9 present possible scenarios for potential risks t...
Conceptual Model. The conceptual model simulates general aspects of Port Valdez that can interact and pose a risk to the environment. These aspects covered by the model include: Sub-Areas - designated subdivisions of the marine environment created for the purpose of comparison Sources - anthropogenic operations or activities that release stressors Habitats - environments supporting specific groups of receptor; Impacts - changes to individuals, populations, or communities related to the assessment endpoints Exposure and Effects-Links - connections between sources, habitats, and impacts that establish a risk. The first part of the conceptual model defines the sub-areas used for comparison within the Port (Section 5.1). The second part describes components of the model that were compared between the different sub-areas (Section 5.2 to 5.4). In this assessment, these components included sources, habitats, and impacts to assessment endpoints. Anthropogenic stressors originate from a source. Identifying the sources provides information on what types of stressors might be present in the environment. We have identified possible sources of anthropogenic stressors by reviewing scientific and monitoring reports, public comments, use patterns, and regulatory permits. The sources are described in Section
Conceptual Model. The theoretical model proposed in Chapter 2 conceptualises international learning as a ‘three-‐table’ game played in the public, policy and diplomatic spheres. Knowledge affects action across three inter-‐linked spheres of learning: 1) a Public Sphere populated by policy or epistemic communities, 2) a Political Sphere dominated by domestic political aggregators and deciders, and 3) a Diplomatic Sphere dominated by international actors such as leaders or negotiators in foreign policy forums. The motive force for knowledge construction is provided by power in the form of intention, influence, selection or discipline. With this force, knowledge spirals into international forums and comes alive in ‘performances’ in these forums. The forums – bilateral or multilateral -‐ that constitute the Diplomatic Sphere are like a ‘stage’ for the play and replay of ‘ritual’ or dialogue that embodies and symbolically articulates learning. Following Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx, it is seen that the ritual of dialogue in these forums also includes the power relationships inherent in learning and the staging process is merely a temporary and provisional resolution of power struggles.12 Further, following Heclo, it is seen that both ‘puzzling’ and ‘powering’ are underway simultaneously. Discourse and practice too overlap and in certain cases (such as nuclear arms control) are practically indistinguishable. Knowledge accumulates over successive iterations of representational activity and the ‘theatres of talk’ and ‘theatres of knowledge’ cannot be separated from each other. Knowledge is not reified in this model but is rooted in concrete activity nor do the three spheres necessarily imply any hierarchy in terms of where knowledge is constructed. The fundamental process that constitutes learning at each level is iteration of script (S) and performance (P) through which discourse gets modified incrementally or paradigmatically 12 Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx, ‘Ritual as Intellectual Property’, Man, New Series, Vol. 27, Issue 2, (June 1992), 225-‐244.
Conceptual Model. The AIXM Conceptual Model is the component of the AIXM data standard that provides a conceptual model of aeronautical data. It models the important features, properties (attributes and associations) and business rules that make up aeronautical information. As such, it can be used as the basis for the design of an AIM database. The model is designed using the Unified Modelling Language (UML).
Conceptual Model. A model (Figure 1) is tested that derived from a review of the literature by integrating theory and research relating to the organizational justice, commitment and their relationship to opportunistic behaviour by creating psychological contract between employer and employee. Figure 1: Relationship between Dependent and Independent Variables INDEPENDENT VARIABLES DEPENDENT VARIABLES PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AFFECTIVE NORMATIVE REDUCING OPPORTUNISTIC BEHAVIOUR DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE CONINUOUS EMPLOYER EMPLOYEE
Conceptual Model. About Conceptual Models Navicat Data Modeler allows you to create conceptual models, including entities and relations. In the New Model window, choose Conceptual as Model Type. You can also use the following features to create a conceptual model: • Import from Database - reverse engineer from existing databases/schemas or ODBC data source. • Model Conversion - convert from a physical/logical model. Add Entities to Conceptual Model To add a new entity, click the Entity button from the toolbar and click anywhere on the canvas. To add an existing entity from the Explorer's Model tab, simply drag and drop the selected entity from the Model tab to the canvas. The pop-up menu options of the entity object in the canvas include: Option Description Add Related Objects Add all related entities to the selected entity. Cut Remove the entity from the diagram and put it on the clipboard. Copy Copy the entity from the diagram to the clipboard. Paste Paste the content from the clipboard into the diagram. Select All Entities Select all entities in the diagram. Delete from Diagram / Delete from Diagram and Model Delete an entity from the diagram or from both diagram and model. Rename Change the name of the entity. Color Change the color of the entity. Size to Fit Resize the entity automatically to fit its contents. Bring to Front Bring the entity to the foreground. Send to Back Move the entity to the background. Add Relations to Conceptual Model To add a relation, click the Relation button from the toolbar and drag the child entity and drop to the parent entity. To show/hide the linked name label, simply check/uncheck the Show name option in the Properties pane. When you move your mouse over a relation connector, the border of the parent and the child entities turn to green and blue respectively. The pop-up menu options of the relation in the canvas include: Option Description Cardinality on entity_name1 Set the cardinality on entity_name1: None, One and Only One, Many, One or Many, Zero or One, Zero or Many. Cardinality on entity_name2 Set the cardinality on entity_name2: None, One and Only One, Many, One or Many, Zero or One, Zero or Many. Add Vertex Add a vertex on a relation connector. Delete Vertex Delete a vertex on a relation connector. Delete All Vertices Delete all vertices on a relation connector. Paste Paste the content from the clipboard into the diagram. Select All Relations Select all relations in the diagram. Delete from Diagram and Model Delete a relation fr...
