Annual Evaluation Process. (a) The chair/supervisor shall provide to his/her department faculty the form or format for submission of a faculty member’s annual report no later than April 1. The student evaluations of classroom instruction shall be provided to the faculty member no later than May 15.
Annual Evaluation Process. The annual evaluation assesses an employee’s performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified in Section 18.5 and in departmental by- laws.
Annual Evaluation Process. Following the schedule adopted by the CEPS College, SOE faculty will submit evaluation materials to the SOE Director following established protocols. These materials will detail the faculty member's performance over the annual evaluation period in relation to teaching, service, and scholarship (if applicable) and should provide compelling evidence of the quantity, quality and impact of the faculty member's performance and progress toward tenure and/or promotion (if applicable). Materials to be submitted include (1) a statement of contributions with appendices detailing productivity in designated areas, (2) a current curriculum vitae with those items added since the last evaluation highlighted, and (3) accompanying materials supporting claims made in the statement of contributions (e.g., student assessment of instruction, published works). It is the responsibility of the faculty member to present supporting materials that provide compelling and convincing evidence of having met the specified criteria for the self- rating in each of the designated areas of responsibility for the respective faculty member (i.e., teaching, service, and scholarship when included in assignment). Note that the performance indicators listed below are intended to be illustrative and not exhaustive, and the process of assessing productivity and the relative value of individual products should be attentive to discipline specifics, emerging trends, and new technologies. Instructors should reference the criteria for teaching and service found in the SOE Statement on Teaching and SOE Statement on Service. Tenure-earning faculty should also reference the criteria for teaching, scholarship, and service found in the SOE Statement on Teaching, SOE Statement on Creative and Scholarly Projects, and SOE Statement on Service. The SOE Director will then review the self-ratings and provide his/her rating of the faculty member’s performance. If there is a discrepancy between the self-rating and the SOE Director’s rating, the discrepancies will be discussed during a meeting with the individual faculty member. It is the responsibility of the individual faculty member to provide sufficient context and/or explanation to clarify and justify the qualitative weight/impact that should be afforded to a particular piece of evidence. Examples of information that may be used to demonstrate competence in teaching, service, and scholarship include: Teaching ● Course materials that demonstrate innovation, organi...
Annual Evaluation Process. All teaching assistant Unit Members shall receive an annual evaluation. An annual evaluation shall be written for all probationary Unit Members based upon whichever written observa- tions were made and upon any other information pertinent to the purpose of the evaluation. Unit Members shall receive a copy of a draft of their annual evaluation at least two (2) days before any conference and in the case of probationary Unit Members, such draft shall be received no later than June 1. For tenured Unit Members, the evaluation may be completed any time during the year. For all Unit Members a conference with the supervisor shall be scheduled concerning such evaluation within ten (10) school days of receipt of such draft unless mutually extended. A Unit Member shall have the right to submit a written response or explanation to such evaluation, which shall be attached to such evaluation. Space for Unit Member comments of a reasonable length shall be added to the evaluation form and the evaluation report shall relate to performance during the period covered by the report. A Unit Member shall be informed whenever a situation or circumstance arises which would be det- rimental, in and of itself, to such Unit Member’s evaluation. Probationary Unit Members will be given notice no later than sixty (60) days prior to the end of their probationary period that they will not be continued in employment, but every effort will be made to give more notice in cases where an earlier decision not to continue such employment has been made by the superintendent. In cases where the evaluation process has caused delay, notice will be given as soon as a decision is reached. The District and the AGCEP Association recognize the need for, and are committed to, the improvement of instruction. Both parties agree to actively pursue and support activities and programs which are designed to improve classroom instruction. Appendix C Classroom Teaching Assistant Performance Review Criteria The Greece Central School District is committed to excellence. The Teaching Assistant is intended to provide instructional support for students under the direct supervision of the classroom teach- er. Therefore, the classroom teacher will plan, organize, implement and assess both students and lessons. Additionally, the classroom teacher will plan for the teaching assistant’s responsibilities on a daily basis, providing clear direction and support. Teaching Assistants are expected to demonstrate competence in th...
