Table 9. Methods of transportation (COMM1) Group University All of students 1 2 3 Winnipeg (n=15,248) (n=5,263) (n=7,365) (n=2,620) (n=825) Public transportation 39% 26% 44% 39% 54% Vehicle (alone) 28% 46% 26% 12% 24% Walk 22% 13% 19% 42% 10% Vehicle (with others) 7% 11% 6% 4% 9% Bicycle 2% <1% 2% 2% <1% Other <1% <1% <1% <1% <1% Don't attend campus 2% 3% 2% 1% <1% Difference by visible minority. Visible minority students are more likely than non-visible minority students to use public transportation (51% versus 30%) and less likely to use a vehicle (40% versus 28%) to commute to campus.
Table 9. Analysis 2a: metric selection results. Metric - stressor correlation was consistent (yes) if the sign of the correlation was as expected. Xxxxxxxx rank correlation between the EQR, calculated using the formula EQR2, and the stressor is reported. A metric was redundant (redundancy=yes) if correlated (r>0.8)
Table 9. Relation concepts between the different Aspects
Examples of Table 9 in a sentence
You may designate up to the number of contacts described in Table 9 below based on the number of Standard and Premium Software Subscriptions you have purchased.
The Department will require the awarded vendor to begin and complete work within the timeframe identified in Table 9.
As Table 9 shows, in their first year of university, about half (47%) of students live with their parents or other relatives.
The State is not required to provide services via the additional primary care-related provider network, if expenditures for such services exceed the total computable amount for each DY as described in the Table 9 below.
If you would like an Affiliated Company or Service Facilitator to have access to Information, please complete Table 9.
More Definitions of Table 9
Table 9. State Rates for Lodging and Meals LODGING $82.00 For all counties excluding Milwaukee, Waukesha, and Racine Counties. $90.00 Rate for Milwaukee, Waukesha, and Racine counties. MEALS $8.00 Breakfast $10.00 Lunch $20.00 Dinner
Table 9. Special session at ICEM2020: Session contributions.
Table 9. Description of the questions and sub-questions (criteria) proposed for the self-assessment of the impacts (benefits, barriers, costs) of the uptake of RRI actions Main questions (Q) Criteria (C) Impact of RRI action (s)
Table 9. Methods of transportation All Group University of the students 1 2 3 Fraser Valley (n=22,537) (n=7,117) (n=7,054) (n=8,366) (n=386) Public transportation 42% 27% 46% 49% 8% Vehicle (alone) 23% 37% 25% 11% 74% Walk 22% 11% 20% 32% 4% Vehicle (with others) 6% 8% 6% 4% 12% Bicycle 2% <1% 2% 3% <1% Other <1% 1% <1% <1% <1% Don't attend campus 5% 15% <1% <1% <1%
Table 9. The means for the possibility to take responsibility M1 SD1 M2 SD2 Time of the measurement 3.28 .74 3.37 .69 Form of teaching safe driving course 3.28 .75 3.30 .68 theory lesson 3.23 .73 3.35 .71 Educational background working 3.43 .79 3.33 .76 studying 3.20 .66 3.34 .54 Age ≤ 20 3.22 .68 3.26 .66 > 20 3.25 .88 3.64 .79 Gender Male 3.35 .70 3.42 .74 Female 3.22 .78 3.31 .65 1= first measurement 2= second measurement Table 10. Analysis of variance for Responsibility Source df F η p Measurement (M) 1 4.34 .02 .04 Form of teaching (F) 1 2.70 .02 .10 Educational background (E) 1 .23 .00 .63 Age (A) 1 .06 .00 .80 Gender (G) 1 .58 .00 .45 F x G 1 .51 .00 .48 M x G 1 .36 .00 .55 A x G 1 .55 .00 .46 E x G 1 1.23 .01 .27 M x F 1 .60 .00 .44 F x A 1 3.30 .02 .07 F x E 1 .40 .00 .53 M x A 1 8.24 .05 .00 M x E 1 6.83 .04 .01 E x A 1 .78 .00 .38 error 173
Table 9. Scale Report Breakdown of Slut by Relationship (Address) Number of Respondents Reference and Relationship Average Frequency of Bitch by Relationship (Reference) 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0
Table 9. The LSE bursary scheme for new UK entrants in 2017 * LSE offers one four-year degree programme – BSc Philosophy, Politics and Economics (PPE). Students enrolled on this programme who are eligible for the bursary will receive the same per annum award over the four years of the programme – ie. £16,000 tapering down to £3,000. Students’ household income LSE award per annum Total value of award over three years * £0 - £18,000 £4,000 £12,000 £18001 - £25,000 £3,500 £10,500 £25,001 - £30,000 £2,750 £8,250 £30,001 - £35,000 £1,750 £5,250 £35,001 - £40,000 £1,000 £3,000 £40,001 - £42,611 £750 £2,250 The LSE bursary scheme for continuing UK students LSE will continue to provide bursary support for continuing students according to the terms of the Access Agreement for the year in which they started their studies at the School. LSE scholarships LSE continues to seek and receive external funding from private donors and from businesses to provide scholarships for students from low socio-economic backgrounds. Currently, the School awards around £200,000 a year through such scholarships to new and continuing UK students. These scholarships are additional to our Access Agreement spend and, as such, are not included in the figures in Table 6. It is the wish of donors that if they offer an amount that together with the bursary will cover all fees and living costs, then the students will not borrow anything from Student Finance and will be able to study without incurring any debt. Most scholarships are partial however so will only reduce the overall loan required. For 2017 and 2018 LSE is offering three Access to Education awards made up of support for the tuition fee and living costs for prospective students holding an offer of a place on an LSE Undergraduate programme whose immigration status is classed as: an asylum-seeker; or a refugee; or a person with humanitarian protection; or a person who is resident in the UK and has been granted Discretionary/Limited Leave to Remain in the UK