Table 8. Means of Recidivists and Non-Recidivists for Eight Risk/Need Factors and the Results of the Discriminant Function Analvsis Group Recidivists (n = 76)Non-Recidivists (n = 174)Correlations of predictor variables with * f i < . 01 . * * fi < .001 Note. Predictor variables (OFF - Prior and current offences/dispositions; FAM Family Circumstances/Parenting; EDUC - Education/Employment; PEER - Peer Relations; SUB - Substance Abuse; LEIS - Leisure/Recreation; PERS - Personality/Behaviour; ATT - Attitudes/Orientations).3 Values in brackets refer to the maximum score observed in the group. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.Critical Evaluation
Table 8. Analysis 2a: metric selection results. Metric - stressor correlation was consistent (yes) if the sign of the correlation was as expected. Xxxxxxxx rank correlation between the EQR, calculated using the formula EQR1, and the stressor is reported. A metric was redundant (redundancy=yes) if correlated (r>0.8)
Table 8. Children observed Age category Frequency Percent Cumulative Percent 0 - 11 Months 62 30% 30 12 - 23 Months 63 30.4% 60.4 24 - 35 Months 31 15% 75.4 36 - 47 Months 22 10.6% 86 48 - 59 Months 29 14% 100 Total 207 100 Table 9: single reasons for bringing child to health facility. n = 207 Reason for bringing child to health facility Count Column % Diarrhea/Vomiting 78 37.7% Fever/Malaria 129 62.3% Difficulty breathing / cough / pneumonia 97 46.9% Other 54 26.1% Table 10: Combined reasons for bringing child to health facility. n = 207 Reason for bringing child to health facility Count Column % Diarrhea/Vomiting & Malaria 48 23.2% Diarrhea & difficult breathing 23 11.1% Fever/Malaria & Difficulty breathing 73 35.3% Diarrhea/Vomiting, Fever/Malaria & Difficult breathing/cough/pneumonia 20 9.7% Health Worker Practice Screening Table 11 shows the proportion of cases screened for age, weight and temperature. The assessment found that about 97.1% of the cases were asked about their ages and 80.2% had their temperature checked. Nearly all the cases were weighed but only 58.3% had their weights plotted. Table 11: General Screening Action Yes No n Asked age of child 97.1% 2.9% 205 Weighed child 97.5% 2.5% 203 Plotted weight 58.3% 41.7% 199 Checked temperature 80.2% 19.8% 202 Comparing to the baseline, there was no change the proportion of cases whose age was asked. There were some observable differences however, on cases whose weight was assessed and plotted. Five years ago, the probability that a case of a child of less than five years of age would have the weight checked was 71%. Five years later, this has improved where only less than 3% of the cases missed on this assessment. There was also an improvement on the proportion of cases whose weight was plotted, from 31% to 58%. General screening 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 97 97.1 97.5 80.2 71 58.3 31 Asked age of Weighed child child Plotted weight Checked temperature Screening Baseline EOP % of cases Figure 10: General screening Among all the children that were observed, 42% had all the danger signs assessed and only 7.7% were correctly assessed for nutrition status (Table 12). Diarrhea, ARI and fever assessments were only done to cases exhibiting the same. Just about a third (32.5%) of all diarrhea cases had all diarrhea assessments tasks done and about two thirds (67.7%) of ARI cases were assessed comprehensively. Few cases of fever (16.4%) received complete assessments despite fever being the single most major ...
Examples of Table 8 in a sentence
If you own or operate any of the following RICE with a site rating of more than 500 brake HP located at a major source of HAP emissions, you do not need to comply with the requirements in the General Provisions specified in Table 8 except for the initial notification requirements: A new stationary RICE that combusts landfill gas or digester gas equivalent to 10 percent or more of the gross heat input on an annual basis, a new emergency stationary RICE, or a new limited use stationary RICE.
You must also report each instance in which you did not meet the requirements in Table 8 to this subpart that apply to you.
The government has established mechanisms to coordinate its efforts to address child labor (Table 8).
Table 8 to this subpart shows which parts of the General Provisions in §§63.1 through 63.15 apply to you.
The Contractor will provide the pricing of the upgraded product(s) to a maximum of 20% of each Category Contract Price of Table 8.
More Definitions of Table 8
Table 8. HSCoE Metal Hydride Material Categories Tier 1 Developed Materials Tier 2 Developing Materials Down-selected Materials Metal Hydrides NaAlH 4 2LiNH 2 +MgH 2 Mg(NH 2 ) 2 +MgH 2 +2LiH TiCr(Mn)H 2 MgH 2 Mg 2 NiH 4 Material property data for the metal hydride materials of interest (particularly Tier 1 and Tier 2 materials) were collected from a variety of sources, which included MHCoE reports and investigator data, previous studies and the open literature. To perform preliminary engineering analyses several key material properties were identified as a high priority requirement. These key material properties included:
Table 8. Optiomal evaluation scores for keyphrases with enhancement and enrichment in the validation set
Table 8. Security infrastructure in ML Service Description Access Control Access Control includes the Authentication and Authorisation services. The Authentication service verifies a user’s credentials and allows access to the system only to users with valid credentials. The Authorisation service determines what operations and which data an authenticated user can access, allowing access to resources only to legitimate, authorised users. An Authentication with the system is provided over the caregiver UI which have access to the system data Encryption The encryption mechanism describes functionality related to confidentiality and integrity protection of data. Data channel encryption is applied in the KB. Secure Communication Secure communication is the mechanism describing functionality needed to secure data being transmitted between two endpoints. In Miraculous-Life the OSGi technology has been selected as the main technical platform for the implementation of services and components. Within the OSGi framework the SOA Services technologies are the main technological platform to use as presented in this Miraculous-Life architecture deliverable.
Table 8. Means and standard error (SE) of oyster shell height and wet mass by sampling time from the Choptank River (CR), the low salinity site, for Year Two 49
Table 8. The helper methods on the protocol state.
Table 8. Frequency of Slut as Address by Relationship Survey responses for slut demonstrated similar patterns, though at an overall lower frequency. The reported use of address for slut by relationship demonstrated a slight pattern depending on how close the speaker considered their addressee. In Table 8, all of the
Table 8. Performance indicator for measuring sustainability of buildings (Umbria Region, 2013) An interesting exercise can be represented by matching measures implemented for enhancing the values of these indicators for sustainability, by a climate change perspective, with resilience properties to check to what extent these measures can be resilient-oriented. By this perspective, an attempt has been recently led by Xxxxxxxxx and Xxxxxxx (2012) with a contribution that is mainly addressed, on one hand, to provide, by integrating different disciplinary perspectives, a conceptual model of the set of adaptive capacities and properties that characterize a resilient system and, on the other hand, to verify, starting from a snapshot of current strategies and actions for urban adaptation currently implemented at European level, the consistency between those strategies and the identified set of resilience capacities and properties.