Stay of Litigation Sample Clauses

Stay of Litigation. The Parties agree that upon the execution of this Agreement the litigation shall be stayed, except to effectuate the terms of this Agreement. The Parties further agree that upon the signing of this Agreement that pursuant to CCP section 583.330 to extend the date to bring a case to trial under CCP section 583.310 for the entire period of this settlement process.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Stay of Litigation. The Parties agree that upon the execution of this Agreement the litigation shall be stayed, except to effectuate the terms of this Agreement. The Parties further agree that upon the signing of this Agreement that pursuant to CCP section 583.330 to extend the date to bring a case to trial under CCP section 583.310 for the entire period of this settlement process. DocuSign Envelope ID: 0E7FEE4E-5673-41CC-BAAB-DD1B1217C8AD 7/17/2023 Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Chief of People and Opportunity Development June 26, 2023 COURT APPROVED NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PAGA SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR FINAL COURT APPROVAL The Superior Court for the State of California authorized this Notice. Read it carefully! It is not junk mail, spam, an advertisement, or solicitation by a lawyer. You are not being sued. You may be eligible to receive money from an employee class action lawsuit (“Action”) brought by Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx and Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx (“Plaintiffs”) against their former employer, X. Xxxxx & Company, Inc. (“Defendant” is used herein as a placeholder), for alleged wage and hour violations (the “Action). The Action seeks payment of (1) back wages and other relief for a class of non- exempt hourly employees (“Class Members”) who worked for Defendant during the Class Period (August 29, 2017 to November 22, 2022); and (2) penalties under the California Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”) for all hourly non-exempt employees who worked for Defendant during the PAGA Period (November 15, 2021 to November 22, 2022) (“Aggrieved Employees”). Defendant denies the allegations, denies any failure to comply with the laws, and denies any and all liability. The proposed Settlement has two main parts: (1) a Class Settlement requiring Defendant to fund Individual Class Payments, and (2) a PAGA Settlement requiring Defendant to fund Individual PAGA Payments and pay penalties to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency (“LWDA”). Based on Defendant's records, and the Parties’ current assumptions, your Individual Class Payment is estimated to be $ (less withholding) and your Individual PAGA Payment is estimated to be $ . The actual amount you may receive likely will be different and will depend on a number of factors. (If no amount is stated for your Individual PAGA Payment, then according to Defendant's records you are not eligible for an Individual PAGA Payment under the Settlement because you did not work during the PAGA Period.) The above estimates are based on Defendant’s records sho...
Stay of Litigation. Stockholder and Company agree to stay all activities in the Lawsuits until the Termination Time, including, without limitation, refraining from seeking any discovery, filing any motions or amendments to pleadings or previous motions, and to further postpone any deadlines, discovery cut-offs, response dates, or similar matters which have not expired prior to the date of this Agreement. Stockholder and Company shall cooperate in taking all reasonable steps to ensure a stay of all activities in the Lawsuits and to ensure that the Lawsuits, to the extent within the control of Stockholder and Company, remain inactive in all respects involving Stockholder and Company. If not previously dismissed prior to the Effective Time, all Lawsuits will be dismissed with prejudice promptly following the Effective Time.
Stay of Litigation. The Parties agree that upon the execution of this Agreement the litigation shall be stayed, except to effectuate the terms of this Agreement. The Parties further agree that upon the signing of this Agreement that pursuant to CCP section 583.330 to extend the date to bring a case to trial under CCP section 583.310 for the entire period of this settlement process. Plaintiff: Date: 11/21/2022 By: Xxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx Defendant: AIDS Healthcare Foundation Date: By: By: Its: By: Xxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx Attorney for Plaintiff Approved as to form only: Date: Date: By: By: Attorney for Defendant 11/22/22 COURT APPROVED NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR FINAL COURT APPROVAL Xxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx v. AIDS Healthcare Foundation Case No. 20STCV31938 The Superior Court for the State of California authorized this Notice. Read it carefully! It’s not junk mail, spam, an advertisement, or solicitation by a lawyer. You are not being sued. You may be eligible to receive money from the proposed settlement of an employee class action lawsuit (“Action”) involving AIDS Healthcare Foundation ( “AHF”) for alleged wage and hour violations. AHF strongly denies violating any laws or failing to pay any wages and contends it complied with all applicable laws. The Action was filed by AHF employee Xxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx (“Plaintiff”) and seeks payment of (1) back wages and other relief for a class of hourly employees (“Class Members”) who worked for AHF during the Class Period of April 24, 2018, to <<<preliminary approval>>>; and (2) penalties under the California Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”) for all hourly employees who worked for AHF during the PAGA Period of June 5, 2019 to <<<preliminary approval>>> (“PAGA Employees”). The proposed Settlement has two main parts: (1) a Class Settlement wherein AHF will fund Individual Class Payments, and (2) a PAGA Settlement wherein AHF will fund Individual PAGA Payments and provide monies to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency (“LWDA”). Based on AHF’s records, and the Parties’ current assumptions, your Individual Class Payment is estimated to be $ (less withholding) and your Individual PAGA Payment is estimated to be $ . The actual amount you may receive likely will be different and will depend on a number of factors. (If no amount is stated for your Individual PAGA Payment, then according to AHF’s records you are not eligible for an Individual PAGA Payment under the Settlement because you didn’t work during the PAG...
Stay of Litigation. All proceedings in the Litigation, other than those related to approval of the Settlement Agreement, are hereby stayed. Further, any actions brought by Settlement Class Members concerning the Released Claims are hereby enjoined and stayed pending Final Approval of the Settlement Agreement.
Stay of Litigation. The Parties agree upon the execution of this Agreement the litigation shall be stayed, except to effectuate the terms of this Agreement. The Parties further agree that upon the signing of this Agreement that pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 583.330 to extend the date to bring a case to trial under Code of Civil Procedure section
Stay of Litigation. The Parties agree that upon the execution of this Agreement the litigation shall be stayed, except to effectuate the terms of this Agreement. The Parties further agree, upon the signing of this Agreement and pursuant to CCP section 583.330, to extend the date to bring a case to trial under CCP section 583.310 for the entire period of this settlement process. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / [Signatures on following page] Dated: November 8 , 2000 XXXXXXXXF AND CLASS REPRESENTATIVE: Xxxxx Xxxxxx Datxx: Xoxxxxxx 8 , 2022 XXXXX XXXXXXX: LAUBY MANKIN LAUBY LLP Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx Attorneys for Plaintifx Xxxxx: November , 0000 XXXXXXXXX: XXXXXXXXX & XXX, L.P. Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx Sr. Vice President & General Counsel Dated: November , 2022 DEFENDAXX’X XXXXXXX: LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Attorneys for Defendant END OF DOCUMENT Dated: November , 2022 Dated: November_, 2022 Dated: November __2__, 2000 XXXXXXXFF AND CLASS REPREXXXXXTIVE: Xxxxx Xxxxxx XXXXX XXXXXXX: LAUBY MANKJN LAUBY LLP Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx Atxxxxxxx xor Plaintiff X--· XXXXXXXXX: XXXXXXXXX & XXX, L.P. Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx Sr. Vice President & General Counsel Dated: November_3 LASC CIV 296 NEW 06/22 For Optional Uxx , 0002 DEFENXXXX'X XXXXXXX: LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Attorneys for Defendant END OF D OCUMENT Exhibit “A” COURT APPROVED NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT XXX XEARING DATX XXX XXXXX COURT APPROVAL Xxxxxx, et. al. v. Xxxxxxxxx & Xxx, L.P. (Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. 20STCV30747) The Superior Court for the State of California authorized this Notice. Read it carefully! It’s not junk mail, spam, an advertisement, or solicitation by a lawyer. You are not being sued. You may be eligible to receive money from an employxx xxxxx action lawsuit (“Action”) against Shambaugh & Xxx, L.P. (“Defendant” or “Xxxxxxxxx”) for alleged xxxx xxx xxur violatixxx. Xxx Action was filed by Xxxxx Xxxxxx a former Shambaugh employee (“Plaintiff”) and seeks payment of (1) unpaid wages, statutory damages, interest and attorneys’ fees ox xxxxxx of a class of non-exempt/hourly employees of Xxxxxxxxx, who are not represented by any union (i.e., non-union employees) and who worked in CaliforniaClass Members”) during the Class Period (August 19, 2017 to November 30, 2022); and (2) penalties under the California Private Attorney Generax Xxx (“PAGA”) for all non-exempt/hourly employees of Xxxxxxxxx, who are not represented by any union (i.e., non-union employees) and who worked in California during th...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Stay of Litigation. The Parties agree that upon the execution of this Agreement the litigation shall be stayed, except to effectuate the terms of this Agreement. The Parties further agree that upon the signing of this Agreement that pursuant to CCP section 583.330 to extend the date to bring a case to trial under CCP section 583.310 for the entire period of this settlement process. Date: PLAINTIFF LOVE Xxxx Xxxx Date: DEFENDANT XXXXXX FAMILY OF PROGRAMS, INC. By: Date: 11/10/2023 AEGIS LAW FIRM, PC Xxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx X.X. Xxxxxx Attorneys for Plaintiff Date: CLOUSE SPANIAC Xxxx X. Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Attorneys for Defendant
Stay of Litigation. The Parties agree that upon the execution of this Agreement the litigation shall be stayed, except to effectuate the terms of this Agreement. The Parties further agree that upon the signing of this Agreement that pursuant to CCP section 583.330 to extend the date to bring a case to trial under CCP section 583.310 for the entire period of this settlement process. Plaintiff: Xxxxx Xxxxx 2/2/2024 Date: Defendant: Ansible Government Solutions, LLC Date: By: Title: Approved as to form only: Date: 2/2/2024 XXXX LAW FIRM Nazo Koulloukian Attorney for Plaintiff XXXXXXXX LAW GROUP, APC Date: 2/2/2024 Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Attorney for Plaintiff XXXXXXX, XXXXXX, XXXXXXXX & XXXXXXX LLP Date: By: Xxxxxx X. Xxxxx, Esq. Attorney for Defendant COURT APPROVED NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR FINAL COURT APPROVAL Xxxxx Xxxxx v. Ansible Government Solutions, LLC Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. 22STCV35081 The Superior Court for the State of California authorized this Notice. Read it carefully! It’s not junk mail, spam, an advertisement, or solicitation by a lawyer. You are not being sued. You may be eligible to receive money from an employee class action lawsuit (“Action”) against Ansible Government Solutions, LLC (hereafter referred to as “Ansible”) for alleged wage and hour violations. The Action was filed by a former Ansible employee, Xxxxx Xxxxx (“Plaintiff”) and seeks payment of (1) back wages, unreimbursed expenses, and penalties for a class of hourly employees with the job title of phlebotomist (“Class Members”) who worked for Ansible during the Class Period (November 3, 2018 to ); and (2) penalties under the California Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”) for all hourly employees with the job title of phlebotomist who worked for Ansible during the PAGA Period (October 27, 2021 to ) (“Aggrieved Employees”). The proposed Settlement has two main parts: (1) a Class Settlement requiring Ansible to fund Individual Class Payments, and (2) a PAGA Settlement requiring Ansible to fund Individual PAGA Payments and pay penalties to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency (“LWDA”). Based on Ansible’s records, and the Parties’ current assumptions, your Individual Class Payment is estimated to be $ (less withholding) and your Individual PAGA Payment is estimated to be $ . The actual amount you may receive likely will be different and will depend on a number of factors. (If no amount is stated for your Individ...
Stay of Litigation. The Parties agree that upon the execution of this Agreement the litigation shall be stayed, except to effectuate the terms of this Agreement. [ S i g n a t u r e s o n n e x t p a g e . ] IT IS XXXXXX AGREED. DATED: August 21, 2023 President Defendant Professional Automotive Relocation Services, Inc. DATED: August 21, 2023 Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Plaintiff and Class Representative DATED: August 21, 2023 Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff and Class Counsel DATED: August 21, 2023 Xxxxxx Xxxx SCOPELITIS, XXXXXX, XXXXX, XXXXXX & XXXXX, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant Professional Automotive Relocation Services, Inc. 0000-0000-0000, v. 1 COURT-APPROVED NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PAGA SETTLEMENT AND DATE FOR FINAL APPROVAL HEARING XXXXX XXXXXXXXX, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND THE CLASS MEMBERS v. PROFESSIONAL AUTOMOTIVE RELOCATION SERVICES, INC. CASE NO. CGC-22-603167 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The Superior Court for the State of California authorized this Notice. Read it carefully! It’s not junk mail, spam, an advertisement, or solicitation by a lawyer. You are not being sued. You may be eligible to receive money from a class action lawsuit (“Action”) filed by Plaintiff, Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, against Professional Automotive Relocation Services, Inc. (“PARS”) in which Plaintiff alleges PARS misclassified vehicle transport drivers as “independent contractors” rather than “employees.” In the Complaint, Plaintiff seeks compensation for allegedly unpaid wages, noncompliant meal and rest periods, and unreimbursed expenses; penalties for allegedly noncompliant wage statements and untimely payment of wages due upon termination; and civil penalties under the California Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”), for himself and all vehicle transport drivers who performed at least one Vehicle Transport for PARS in California, while being classified by PARS as an “independent contractor,” at any time from November 18, 2018 to [INSERT PRELIMINARY APPROVAL DATE OR AUGUST 31, 2023, WHICHEVER IS EARLIER]. PARS denies the allegations asserted in the Action but has agreed, subject to the Court’s Final Approval, to settle Plaintiff’s claims on a classwide basis (the “Settlement”). The Settlement has two main parts: (1) a Class Settlement requiring PARS to pay Individual Class Member Payments to Participating Class Members, and (2) a PAGA Settlement requiring PARS to pay Individual PAGA Payments to Aggrieved Class Members, and ...
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!