Scoring definition

Scoring means sensory evaluation by a panel, using a numerical scale. A nomenclature of defects must be used. ‘Grading’ means a quality classification which is performed on the basis of scoring.

Scoring means assessment of creditworthiness of the User by the Provider for the purpose of obtaining a loan from the Provider or for the purpose of an increase of an already received loan. All that in compliance with Art. 4 of these Business Terms and Conditions.

Scoring a vote means that the NRA will use the vote to determine its rating of each lawmaker. Such ratings influence where the NRA gives money, and many NRA members use it to determine their vote. Members from rural and conservative districts often prize their “A- ratings” from the NRA.

Examples of Scoring in a sentence

• READ CAREFULLY and see in the RFP document under "Proposal Scoring and Evaluation".

• Teacher Observation Scoring Bands Overall Observation Category Score and RatingMinimumMaximumH3.5 to 3.754.0E2.5 to 2.753.49 to 3.74D1.5 to 1.752.49 to 2.74I01.49 to 1.74 HEDI RangesUsing the dropdown menus below, please indicate the locally-determined rubric scoring ranges based on the constraints prescribed by the Commissioner in Subpart 30-3 of the Rules of the Board of Regents for each of the rating categories.

• Principal School Visit Scoring Bands Overall School Visit Category Score and RatingMinimumMaximumH3.5 to 3.754.0E2.5 to 2.753.49 to 3.74D1.5 to 1.752.49 to 2.74I01.49 to 1.74 HEDI RangesUsing the dropdown menus below, please indicate the locally-determined rubric scoring ranges based on the constraints prescribed by the Commissioner in Subpart 30-3 of the Rules of the Board of Regents for each of the rating categories.

• Grade From7.3) HEDI Scoring BandsHighly EffectiveEffectiveDevelopingIneffective2019181716151413121110987654321097-100%93-96%90-92%85-89%80-84%75-79%67-74%60-66%55-59%49-54%44-48%39-43%34-38%29-33%25-28%21-24%17-20%13-16%9-12% 5-8% 0-4% 7.4) Principals with More than One Growth Measure (Transition)For more information on principals with more than one growth measure, please see NYSED APPR Guidance and SLO Guidance: https://www.engageny.org/resource/appr-3012-d.

• Scoring Weights and Process Scoring Weights: The score will be based on a 100-point scale and will measure the degree to which each proposal meets the following criteria.

More Definitions of Scoring

Scoring. Each of these categories is scored on a weighted scale. The weighting of each category and criteria for scoring is detailed in TTM Documentation.

Scoring. Score How difficult is it for the company to clearly define the market demand for the pool of customized product that is going to realize? 1 Very difficult (almost impossible to clearly identify a market demand) 2 Quite difficult (demand is difficult to be investigated due to different reasons)

Scoring. Score Does your company has in place a network of long‐lasting and trusted collaborations? 1 Not at all ( … ) 3 Quite possible to increase the number of collaborations 5 Extremely easy to enlarge the network and add specific actors based on needs Figure 11. Scoring on existence of networks and collaboration

Scoring. The cost per unit of product (e.g. per kg) can be assessed quantitatively if the expected cost (in a decentralized business model) and the cost in the reference situation are known. Otherwise, the cost can be assessed qualitatively using the quantitative scores as a guideline. We look at the percentage change of the cost of the product in the decentralized model compared to the current business model. The cost per unit may increase in some cases; in other cases, it will decrease. Therefore, the scale is both towards the positive and towards the negative. Score Percentage increase of unit costs 1 >30 % 2 20% ‐ 30% 3 0% ‐ 20% 4 ‐10% ‐ 0% 5 <‐10% Figure 18. Scoring on cost per unit of product

Scoring. Ratio of average distance to customer compared to the old model. The distance to customers can be assessed quantitatively if the expected average distance is known. Otherwise, the distance can be assessed qualitatively using the quantitative scores as a guideline. We look at the percentage change of the average distance towards customers in the decentralized model compared to the current business model. The expectation is that the average distance will decrease, therefore the scale is scaled towards the negative side. Score Percentage decrease of distance 1 >10 % 2 0% ‐ 10% 3 ‐20% ‐ 0% 4 ‐20% ‐ ‐30% 5 <‐30% Figure 19. Scoring on distance towards customer 15 An example is given on xxxx://xxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/decentralized-manufacture-the-drivers-and-barriers. Also the case from INSPIRE D1.2, where reworking product X would be necessary, is an example where distributed production can help overcome the shelf life problem.

Scoring. The investment costs per module can be considered in two ways:

Scoring. The assessment of the plant / product quality should be done by expert judgement. For this a qualitative scale can be used from 1 (low quality) to 5 (high quality). The quality should be assessed absolute for the decentralized model. It can be possible that a lower or different quality as in the centralized model is accepted for other benefits, e.g. because the local consumption has different requirements or because local feedstock has different qualities Score 1 Low quality