Scenario 1. Cases where a Participating Institution decides to terminate its participation in the SMART IRB Agreement altogether and the Institution does not have any current ceded Research and is not currently serving as a Reviewing IRB for any Research under the SMART IRB Agreement.
Scenario 1. If the Lift Station Upgrade has been completed and the Future Development’s anticipated demand does not exceed the Sierra Point Lift Station’s capacity after taking into account the anticipated flow from Developer’s entire Project, then such Future Development’s fair share contribution to the Developer will be: Reimbursement to Developer = (Flow Rate ÷ Total Anticipated Increase In Flow) x Cost of Improvements x CPI Adjustment The specific values for the Flow Rate and the CPI Adjustment will be determined (as reasonably calculated by the City Engineer) at the time conditions of approval (or other discretionary approval) for each Future Development are given final approval. The City shall require the Future Development to pay the amounts due under the recapture formula in accordance with the provisions set forth in Section II of this Exhibit C.
Scenario 1 means each generating station will be constructed separately in any one of the following ways:—
Examples of Scenario 1 in a sentence
The largest decline in specificity and NPV was .14 (Scenario 1, base rate 50%).
For example, the largest decrease in PPV was found in Scenario 1 and a selection ratio of 10%.
For cut- score selection using a single test (i.e., Scenario 1), Emons and colleagues (2007) found that dichotomous-item tests and polytomous-item tests had similar effects on the relationship between test length and decision quality.
Test Length = In Scenario 1 and Scenario 2, each involving one test for rejection/selection decisions, test lengths were J 40, 20, 15, 10, and 5.
To assist with defining what a non-complex and complex vertical placement is, some examples are provided below: Scenario 1 The placement is for a single insured, with the same contractual terms.
More Definitions of Scenario 1
Scenario 1 the content of the training is equivalent overall between Canada and the EU Directive 2005/36/EC authorizes the EU Member States to recognize, in accordance with their regulations, the professional qualifications obtained in a third country (whether regarding Member State or third country nationals), but the text points out that the recognition should “respect minimum training conditions”, in particular for professions with automatic recognition37. In other words, for architects, the Directive expects the Member States to use the standard 34 See section 2.3.1 of this document under the heading entitled “Within Canada”, for additional information. 35 See the lists in annexes V and VI of Directive 2005/36/EC (consolidated version). 36 See Article 46 of Directive 2005/36/EC (consolidated version). 37 See, in that regard, paragraph 10 of the “Whereas” section of Directive 2005/36/EC, when it was adopted on September 7, 2005, and paragraph 2 of Article 2 of the Directive concerning its scope of application. indicated in its Article 46 for the recognition of evidence of formal qualifications obtained abroad (outside the EU). In that context, for convenience and to harmonize with what is already being done within the EU, why would the MRA not be based on the text of Directive 2005/36/EC for mutual recognition? This would imply that the Directive must take into account the existence of an MRA within the framework of CETA. The text of the Directive would need to be adjusted accordingly, to provide for the automatic recognition and authorization of Canadian architects. For recognition in Canada of EU architects, the MRA could refer to annexes V and VI of the Directive, which lists European diplomas that meet the standard of Article 46 of the Directive. According to the regulatory approach in Canada, holding a licence from the provincial regulatory body is proof of the adequacy of training and professional skills with respect to the requirements of the practice. Reference to that licence could be used to recognize the professional qualifications of Canadian architects in the EU.
Scenario 1. An entity that licenses system software to its clients, but has not confirmed it has an agreement with its clients that requires the clients to use the software to transact information only for the purposes allowed by the State- Level Trust Agreement.
Scenario 1. THE PATENTEE WINS THE LAWSUIT In this case, the patentee behaves as a monopolist in choosing the profit-maximizing quantity. Specifically, the patentee chooses the monopoly price pm to maximize p p c q p 1Q p 1 Kp K p1 p (B1) P m m P P m m m m m The first-order conditions are then P K 1 p p 1 0 p
Scenario 1. New Associated Hired at $10.75 Hours credit granted to bring accumulated hours to 3,601 hours Scenario 2: Minimum Wage increases to $10.00 Rate increased to $10.25. Hours credit granted to bring accumulated hours to 2,401 hours Scenario 3: Associate transfer to new grade Former rate of $10.00. Hours credit granted to bring accumulated hours to 1,201 hours Progression Schedule: HOURS RATE 0 1200 $ 9.67 1201 2400 $ 9.95 2401 3600 $ 10.25 3601 4800 $ 10.55 4801 6000 $ 11.00 6001 7200 $ 11.50 7201 8400 $ 12.05 8401 9600 $ 12.55 9601 10800 $ 12.95 10801 12000 $ 13.45 12001 13200 $ 13.95
Scenario 1. Zero nominal growth – 0 % increase Under Scenario 1, no increase of the total budget is foreseen compared to the overall budget approved for the triennium 2016-2018. The CMS standard salary costs have been applied, including the 2% annual increment to account for the impact of inflation on statutory staff costs (these standard salary costs are maintained throughout all scenarios). In terms of Secretariat staff, this option provides for maintaining all nine regular posts funded by the core budget. The post of Programme Management Assistant (Science, Implementation & Compliance Unit) has been slightly increased from 75% to 80% in order to be in line with UN staff rules and regulations. However, it is worth noting that the effect of the zero-nominal growth actually implies a real reduction, in terms of the staffing, operation and functioning of the Secretariat. For example, four staff members have worked above the percentages covered by the core budget for their position over the period of 2016-2018 and beyond, in order to maintain the basic functioning of the Secretariat based on the MOP mandates. As such, this scenario will actually lead to a decrease in terms of manpower due to the increased uncertainty of possible supplementary funds during the period of 2019-2021. Furthermore, the budget for the organization of MOP8 has been further decreased compared to that allocated in the 2016-2018 budget for the organization of MOP7. The budgets for translations and for the organization of the meetings of the Technical and Standing Committee meetings are also very limited and will need to be complemented with voluntary funding. The costs related to the maintenance and hosting of websites are not covered by this budget, and other operative costs are reduced to a minimum and will allow the Secretariat to maintain very basic services only. Scenario 2: Zero real growth – + 4.04% / Scenario 1 Scenario 1 (Zero nominal growth) + 2 %/ year as per estimated inflation rate This scenario aims at covering the loss of purchasing power due to inflation, what has not been done for the last 10 years. Estimated at 2% per year, this leads to an increase of 4.04 % in total compared to Scenario 1. It can be regarded as the zero real growth scenario. Scenario 2 includes all elements already included in Scenario
Scenario 1. A friend working at a partner organisation asks you for some data your colleagues recently collected about HIV cases in a particular locality. They plan to offer additional medical/psychosocial support to the community and need to know where to focus their activities. Can you share the data? Would sharing comply with data protection requirements? If so, should you share the data? Why or why not? If you decide to share, what considerations should be made before providing the information? What if there was a particular danger of violence or stigma against HIV positive individuals in the community? What if your friend worked in the government? And, even if we remove the identifying data, are there still risks of sharing? ▶ Where would you turn to find out what you could do? ▶ What should we do? Even if the rules permit it, are there other reasons to not share? ▶ What shouldn’t we do? And why? Scenario 2: You recently collected some data from a local community in an emergency that contains names, addresses and other identifiable information. Your tablet/laptop was running out of battery so you made a quick back-up on a flash drive without protecting Data Playbook Module 7: Responsible Data Practices and Data Protection 51 - 52 D A T A P L A Y B O O K M 7 | S ▷ 10 What can we do vs. What should we do? the data in any way (no password or encryption). You get back to the office and you realise you’ve lost the flash drive. What do you do? What steps could you take before going to collect data to ensure that even if you lost your back-up drive, the data would still be safe? ▶ What can we do? ▶ What should we do? ▶ What shouldn’t we do? Scenario 3: Your office is approached by a large tech company that offers to help you manage your office’s data for free during an emergency. Should you accept this offer? (Options: Tech company #1 has a long and well-reputed history of contributing to humanitarian emergencies and doing charitable work; tech company #2 has large contracts with governments and other companies that could be seen as not respecting privacy or other human rights.) ▶ What can we do? ▶ What should we do? ▶ What shouldn’t we do? Part 4: Discuss results in plenary. Ask what other ethical dilemmas they should consider. Extra credit Review your organisation’s Data Protection Policy with participants. Invite your IT focal point or Security officer to share about digital and data risks after the scenario exercise. This might provide real context to your National ...
Scenario 1 is defined in Section 1.4(a).