QA Review definition

QA Review means the quality assurance review to be performed pursuant to section 9 of Schedule 9.
QA Review. Perform quality assurance and accessibility reviews prior to launching the Web CMS site. • URL Redirection: Webpage redirects for up to 20 URLs from legacy Web CMS sites or pages to their replacement Web CMS location for a period of 1 year. See Customer Web Addresses for additional information. • Site Archive: Upon request, generation of an archive file of the website content from CommonSpot. This archive excludes formatting. • Old Site Deletion: Deletion of the CommonSpot website. • Contributor Training: Content contributor training as needed. Self-guided training will be provided via the OIT website. • Post-Launch Support: One week of direct standard support from the websites team. After this period, requests must be submitted through the service desk. Additional Cost Services: Migration requests which are not part of the included services scope will be conducted by the Custom Solutions Service. These include, but are not limited to, new content type creation, except those identified as Standard Content Types and New theme designs not covered by the Standard Theme (see Appendix A). Customers may elect to have existing custom and 3rd-party CommonSpot functionality recreated in Web CMS as part of their website migration. 50% of the initial development cost will be covered as part of the common good offering. Ongoing maintenance costs will be determined up front and will be the full responsibility of Customer indefinitely. Resource Management: OIT will use the Web Advisory Group-approved prioritization to determine the order in which websites are migrated. Within that prioritization, OIT will work with website owners to identify timeframes conducive to performing the migration. If at any time there is no response from Customer for 30 days, the project may be closed and marked as abandoned. Any work that has been done by OIT on the project may be removed. If Customer wishes to re-open the project, it will be placed at the end of the prioritization queue. Any remaining CommonSpot websites will be deleted on June 30, 2020. Customers not participating in the migration process must make alternative arrangements for website hosting prior to this date. Eligibility: This service offering is available to faculty and staff owners of websites housed in the legacy Web CMS, CommonSpot. Customer Responsibilities: • Assigning a single point of contact for decisions regarding the project. • Continuous engagement in the migration process. Customer’s engagement and cooperati...
QA Review means a review of a FEL 3 study completed in accordance with the QA Review Guidelines.

Examples of QA Review in a sentence

  • Written summaries are produced by EHES NEPA Program staff using a standard format agreed to by the EHES NEPA Program and FHWA that provide QA Review Findings and Recommendations.

  • The QA Review Summaries (Findings and Recommendations) are then shared with RECs and their managers via email, and discussed at REC and environmental managers meetings.

  • The impact of the Removal Action will not affect the SMP schedule for AOU - 1 beyond the impact of the 2015 data QA Review and the possible additional sampling which may be required.

  • A QAPP written by Contractor must include for review: a) Copy of Task Order Work Assignment/SOW b) Reference to a hard or electronic copy of the contractor’s approved QMP c) Copy of Contract SOW if no QMP has been approved d) Copy of EPA/Court Order, if applicable e) The QA Review must determine (with the EPA CO or PO) if a QARF was completed for the environmental data activity described in the QAPP.

  • The PCE Agreement and EHES NEPA Program updates will be regular agenda topics to be discussed during REC team and Region Environmental Manager meetings and will generally follow PCE QA reviews and the completion of QA Review Summaries.

  • Excessive Discrepancies will result in penalties (GCHP will define) D, M, Q, A 3 Scanning Image TAT Claims Mail All Types KPI 100% of all scannable mail will be scanned daily M, Q, A 4 Scanning Image TAT Non-Claims Mail KPI 100% of all scannable mail will be scanned daily M, Q, A 5 Scanning Image Quality Claims & Non-Claims Mail KPI 0.1 % of total weekly images will be subject to QA Review = 98% Failure of initial review will generate secondary review of 3% of total weekly images.

  • If a QA Audit identifies any deficiencies or highlights opportunities for improvement, Supplier agrees to submit a written corrective action plan to AT&T within thirty (30) days of the QA Review.

  • Our approximate schedule is as follows: ▪ Week 1: Mark Infiltration Test Locations, USA Notification, permits (if needed) ▪ Week 2 to 3: Field Exploration, Engineering Analysis, Report Preparation ▪ Week 4: Report Preparation, Internal QA Review, Issue Report Proposal Fees We will perform our services for the fixed fee shown in Table 1.

Related to QA Review

  • Periodic Review means a review conducted by Ofwat for the purpose of determining one or more Price Controls in accordance with Part III of Condition B, but so that references in Part IV of Condition B to a Periodic Review shall exclude any review carried out under paragraph 11 of that Condition and shall include the determination by the Competition and Markets Authority of the relevant questions or, as the case may be, the disputed determination referred to it under paragraph 16 of Condition B;

  • Peer review means evaluation of professional services rendered by a professional practitioner.

  • independent review committee means the independent review committee of the investment fund established under National Instrument 81-107 Independent Review Committee for Investment Funds;

  • Expedited review means an examination, in accordance with

  • Utilization review plan or "plan" means a written procedure for performing review.

  • Peer review committee means one or more persons acting in a peer review capacity who also serve as an officer, director, trustee, agent, or member of any of the following:

  • Utilization review means the prospective (prior to), concurrent (during) or retrospective (after) review of any service to determine whether such service was properly authorized, constitutes a medically necessary service for purposes of benefit payment, and is a covered healthcare service under this plan. WE, US, and OUR means Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode Island. WE, US, or OUR will have the same meaning whether italicized or not. YOU and YOUR means the subscriber or member enrolled for coverage under this agreement. YOU and YOUR will have the same meaning whether italicized or not.

  • Records Review means any assessment the Province conducts pursuant to section A.7.4 (Records Review).

  • Summary Subcontract Report (SSR) Coordinator, as used in this clause, means the individual at the department or agency level who is registered in eSRS and is responsible for acknowledging or rejecting SSRs in eSRS for the department or agency.

  • Review means a financial or operational audit, investigation, inspection or other form of review requested or required by the LHIN under the terms of LHSIA or this Agreement, but does not include the annual audit of the HSP’s financial statements;

  • Supervisory Review means ongoing clinical case reviews in accordance with procedures developed by ADMINISTRATOR, to determine the appropriateness of Diagnosis and treatment and to monitor compliance to the minimum ADMINISTRATOR and Medi-Cal charting standards. Supervisory review is conducted by the program/clinic director or designee.

  • Architectural Review Committee or “ARC” shall mean the architectural review committee established by the Organization to review plans submitted to the Organization for architectural review.

  • Benchmark Review means a review of the Services carried out in accordance with paragraphs 2.1 to 2.3 of Schedule 7 (Value for Money) of this Framework Agreement to determine whether those Services represent Good Value;

  • Performance Review means a summative evaluation of a teacher other than a beginning teacher and used to determine whether the teacher’s practice meets school district expectations and the Iowa teaching standards, and to determine whether the teacher’s practice meets school district expectations for career advancement in accordance with Iowa Code section 284.7.

  • Asset Review means any review of representations and warranties conducted by a Non-Lead Asset Representations Reviewer, as contemplated by Item 1101(m) of Regulation AB.

  • Annual Review means the process as set out in Clause 2.2 below and refers to the annual process of reviewing information and provisions of this Agreement in the light of legal and other changes at the School or the payment history of the parent/guardian. This is known as re- registration.

  • Application Review Start Date means the later date of either the date on which the District issues its written notice that the Applicant has submitted a completed Application or the date on which the Comptroller issues its written notice that the Applicant has submitted a completed Application and as further identified in Section 2.3.A of this Agreement.

  • Program Plan means the tobacco settlement program plan dated February 14, 2001, including exhibits to the program plan, submitted by the authority to the legislative council and the executive council, to provide the state with a secure and stable source of funding for the purposes designated by section 12E.3A and other provisions of this chapter.

  • Drug utilization review means an evaluation of a prescription drug order and patient records for

  • Asset Review Report means, with respect to any Asset Review, the report of the Asset Representations Reviewer prepared in accordance with Section 3.5.

  • Evaluation Team means the team appointed by the City; “Information Meeting” has the meaning set out in section 2.2;

  • Training Plan means the plan that outlines what training and assessment will be conducted off-the-job and what will be conducted on-the-job and how the Registered Training Organisation will assist in ensuring the integrity of both aspects of the training and assessment process.

  • Clinical review criteria means the written screening procedures, decision abstracts, clinical protocols, and practice guidelines used by a health carrier to determine the necessity and appropriateness of health care services.

  • Concurrent review means utilization review conducted during

  • Root Cause Analysis Report means a report addressing a problem or non-conformance, in order to get to the ‘root cause’ of the problem, which thereby assists in correcting or eliminating the cause, and prevent the problem from recurring.

  • Asset Review Quorum In connection with any solicitation of votes to authorize an Asset Review as described in Section 11.01(a), the Holders of Certificates evidencing at least 5% of the aggregate Voting Rights represented by all of the Certificates.