Evidence Used In Evaluation Sample Clauses

Evidence Used In Evaluation. The following categories of evidence shall be used in evaluating each Educator:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evidence Used In Evaluation. The following categories of evidence shall be used in evaluating each Administrator:
Evidence Used In Evaluation. ESE will provide model contract language and guidance on rating Educator impact on student learning growth based on state and district-determined measures of student learning. Upon receiving this model contract language and guidance, the parties agree to bargain with respect to the multiple measures of student learning, growth, and achievement. The following categories of evidence shall be used in evaluating each Educator:
Evidence Used In Evaluation. ESE will provide model contract language and guidance on rating Nurse impact on student learning growth based on state and district-determined measures of student learning. Upon receiving this model contract language and guidance, the parties agree to bargain with respect to the multiple measures of student learning, growth, and achievement. The following categories of evidence shall be used in evaluating each Nurse:
Evidence Used In Evaluation. An average, but flexible, range of evidence collected and submitted may be from 8-15 pieces for each of the four standards by the end of the evaluation cycle. This range is simply to serve as a general guideline to Educators and Evaluators and is not to serve as a concrete quantity. The Evaluator may ask for more or less evidence based on the quality of the items submitted. By the end of the cycle, the evidence submitted shall address all indicators on the rubric and shall be collected by the Educator and Evaluator throughout the duration of the evaluation cycle. Those who are on two-year plans will collect evidence on the standards and goals throughout both school years. The following categories of evidence shall be used in evaluating each Educator:
Evidence Used In Evaluation. The following categories of evidence shall be used in evaluating each Nurse:
Evidence Used In Evaluation. The following categories of evidence will be negotiated by the Parties over the course of the 2012-2013 school year with a completion goal of September 2013, and shall be used thereafter in evaluating each Educator:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evidence Used In Evaluation. The following categories of evidence shall be used in evaluating each Educator: SI Page Minuteman Educator Evaluation Process

Related to Evidence Used In Evaluation

  • Written Evaluation The Superintendent in consultation with the Board shall review and assess the Administrator’s performance on or before February 1 of each year. The Administrator shall be formally evaluated in writing annually by the Superintendent on or before February 1 of each year. The evaluation shall include a description of the Administrator’s duties and responsibilities and the standards to which the Administrator is to perform. It shall consider the Administrator’s specific duties, responsibilities, management and competence as an Administrator; specify the Administrator’s strengths and weaknesses with supporting reasons; align with research based standards established by the Illinois State Board of Education and use data and indicators on student growth as a significant factor in rating performance. The evaluation shall also consist of a review of the Administrator’s progress toward meeting established professional, student performance and academic goals set forth in Appendix A and a review of the Administrator’s leadership and management performance relative to his current assignment. The written evaluation shall be signed by both the Superintendent and the Administrator. The Administrator may respond to the evaluation in writing and such response shall be attached to and included in the Administrator’s personnel file.

  • Finalization of Evaluation A Written Report 1 Before the evaluation cycle is final, and not later than May 10, a copy of the formal written evaluation report shall be given to the teacher and a conference shall be held between the teacher and the evaluator.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting Evaluation 1. The Project Implementing Entity shall monitor and evaluate the progress of the Project and prepare Project Reports in accordance with the provisions of Section 4.08(b) of the General Conditions and on the basis of indicators agreed with the Association. Each such Project Report shall cover the period of one calendar semester, and shall be furnished to the Recipient not later than eight (8) weeks after the end of the period covered by such report for incorporation and forwarding by the Recipient to the Association of the overall Project Report.

  • BID EVALUATION The Commissioner reserves the right to accept or reject any and all Bids, or separable portions of Bids, and waive technicalities, irregularities, and omissions if the Commissioner determines the best interests of the State will be served. The Commissioner, in his/her sole discretion, may accept or reject illegible, incomplete or vague Bids and his/her decision shall be final. A conditional or revocable Bid which clearly communicates the terms or limitations of acceptance may be considered, and Contract award may be made in compliance with the Bidder’s conditional or revocable terms in the Bid.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.