Closing Argument definition

Closing Argument means a party's final summation of evidence and argument, which is presented at the conclusion of the hearing.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Closing Argument or “case summation” shall mean a written discussion of the facts and controlling law of the case. Such written summary may be submitted at any time up to ten days after the expiration of the time frame. An argument that is filed later than ten days after the expiration of the time frame may be considered at the discretion of the ALJ. Such summary does not constitute argument in lieu of evidence as defined in subsection 3.6, below, for purposes of section ten [93-1-10 et seq.]
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Closing Argument means a party's final summation of evidence and argument, which is presented at the conclusion of the hearing. "Consolidation" means the combining of two or more grievances involving the same controversy for purposes of holding a joint hearing,
Sample 1

Examples of Closing Argument in a sentence

  • Closing Argument (5 minutes per side)The Prosecution/Plaintiff gives the opening statement first.

  • Closing Argument (including Rebuttal) [See Rule 4.5]Opening Statements must be given by both sides at the beginning of the trial.

  • Closing Argument (4 minutes)The (Petitioner/Plaintiff) gives the opening statement first.

  • Speculative Rule 6.6.2 Opening Statement or Closing Argument Objections No objections shall be raised during opening statements or during closing arguments.

  • Closing Argument (5 minutes per side)The Prosecution/Plaintiff is the first to present the opening statement and give the closing argument.

  • Closing Argument and Rebuttal (7 minutes per side) ( up to three minutes of time not used by the prosecution/plaintiff attorney will automatically be reserved for rebuttal; however, a rebuttal is not required).

  • Plaintiffs have unequivocally stated their position that the NDPs should be assessed using a full rule of reason inquiry (see Tr. at 15:18-16:2 (Opening Statement), 6783:8-13 (Closing Argument)), and the court agrees that the various complexities in this case preclude a finding that the anticompetitive effects flowing from the36, 57-59 (1977); see also Leegin, 551 U.S. at 885-86.

  • Motion for a Judgment of Acquittal (NO LOCAL RULE) F.R.Crim.P. 29.1. Closing Argument (NO LOCAL RULE)F.R.Crim.P. 30.

  • A video link showing an Objection to a Closing Argument example can be viewed.Visit www.scbar.org/lre and the click on the Middle School or High School Mock Trial logo on the main page.

  • Swenson’s Motion to Dismiss or for a New Trial Based on Improper Government Closing Argument (Dkt.