Examples of Affected Officers in a sentence
For purposes of clarity, in no event shall the Company be required to award any Affected Officers an additional payment or other compensation if the Restatement would have resulted in the grant, payment or vesting of Incentive Compensation that is greater than the Incentive Compensation actually received by the Affected Officer.
To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Committee may, in its discretion, seek recoupment from the Affected Officer(s) through any means it determines, which may include any of the following sources: (i) prior Incentive Compensation payments; (ii) future payments of Incentive Compensation; (iii) cancellation of outstanding Incentive Compensation; (iv) direct repayment; and (v) non-Incentive Compensation or securities held by the Affected Officer.
In seeking recoupment of Erroneously Awarded Compensation under this Policy, to the extent permitted by applicable law, the Committee may, in its discretion, seek recoupment from the Affected Officer(s) from any of the following sources: (i) prior Incentive Compensation payments; (ii) future payments of Incentive Compensation; (iii) cancellation of outstanding Incentive Compensation; and (iv) direct repayment.
To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Committee may, in its discretion, seek recovery from the Affected Officer(s) through any means it determines, which may include any of the following sources: (i) prior Incentive Compensation payments; (ii) future payments of Incentive Compensation; (iii) cancellation of outstanding Incentive Compensation; (iv) direct repayment; and (v) cancellation or forfeiture of other securities held by the Affected Officer.
To the extent required by applicable law or the rules of the Exchange, any profits realized from the sale of securities of the Company are subject to recoupment under this Policy.For purposes of clarity, in no event shall the Company be required to award any Affected Officers an additional payment or other compensation if the Restatement would have resulted in the grant, payment or vesting of Incentive Compensation that is greater than the Incentive Compensation actually received by the Affected Officer.
It is the intent of the Company that Annual Performance Awards satisfy, and this Section 27A be interpreted in a manner that satisfies, the applicable requirements of Code Section 162(m) and the Regulations so that the Company’s tax deduction for Annual Performance Awards to Affected Officers is not disallowed in whole or in part by operation of Code Section 162(m).
Annual Performance Awards are available each year only to Plan Participants who are designated by the Committee, prior to March 31 of such year (or prior to such later date as permitted by Code Section 162(m) and the Regulations), as likely to be Affected Officers for such year, whose annual salary and bonus for such year are expected to exceed $1,000,000 and who are not designated by the Committee as eligible for an Annual Performance Award under the Stock Plan for such year (“Eligible Participants”).
To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Board may, in its discretion, seek recoupment from the Affected Officer(s) through any means it determines, which may include any of the following sources: (i) prior Incentive Compensation payments; (ii) future payments of Incentive Compensation; (iii) cancellation of outstanding Incentive Compensation; (iv) direct repayment; and (v) non-Incentive Compensation or securities held by the Affected Officer.
It is the intent of the Company that Annual Performance Awards satisfy, and this Part IB be interpreted in a manner that satisfies, the applicable requirements of Code Section 162(m) and the Regulations so that the Company’s tax deduction for Annual Performance Awards to Affected Officers is not disallowed in whole or in part by operation of Code Section 162(m).
For purposes of clarity, in no event shall the Company be required to award any Affected Officers an additional payment or other compensation if the restated or accurate financial results would have resulted in the grant, payment or vesting of Incentive Compensation that is greater than the Incentive Compensation actually received by the Affected Officer.