Your monitoring arrangements. In your existing 2012-13 access agreement, you set out how you intended to monitor your fulfilment of your agreement. If you wish to add anything further, following the inclusion of ITT in your agreement, you may do so here.
Your monitoring arrangements. In your existing 2012-13 access agreement, you set out how you intended to monitor your fulfilment of your agreement. If you wish to add anything further, following the inclusion of ITT in your agreement, you may do so here. Monitoring arrangements for ITT students will be in line with the current access agreement Part five: Information to students
Your monitoring arrangements. In your existing 2012-13 access agreement, you set out how you intended to monitor your fulfilment of your agreement. If you wish to add anything further, following the inclusion of ITT in your agreement, you may do so here. Nothing further to add Part five: Information to students As set out in our initial guidance for 2012-13 access agreements (OFFA 2011/01), you must publish clear, accessible and timely information for applicants and trainees on the fees you will charge and any financial support you will offer. This information should make it clear exactly what level of financial support you are offering trainees in each year of their studies. As well as providing clear and up-to-date information through your own information channels (websites, prospectuses etc), you also committed to provide such timely information to UCAS and SLC as they reasonably require to populate their applicant-facing web services. We will assume that this commitment extends to GTTR, where appropriate. If you wish to add anything further, following the inclusion of ITT in your agreement, you may do so here.
Your monitoring arrangements. The ITT student recruitment and retention profile is subject to Faculty-led monitoring of targets in consultation and with support from the central outreach and retention teams.
Your monitoring arrangements. In your existing 2012-13 access agreement, you set out how you intended to monitor your fulfilment of your agreement. If you wish to add anything further, following the inclusion of ITT in your agreement, you may do so here. In addition to the monitoring framework outlined in the Access Agreement, the Department for Teacher Education will be looking at trends in attainment data for identifiable groups to inform both recruitment and student support strategies, both to increase student numbers of BME, disabled and male students and invest in appropriate support mechanisms (e.g. mentoring). This will complement and build on wider research looking at the progression of students from entry to completion and employment, correlated to the academic profile, tariff points and degree classification. Annex A At an institutional level, the University has conducted an equality analysis of its refreshed Corporate Plan 2011-2013, from which a number of priorities have been identified. Our Equality performance in respect of students with 'protected characteristics' (e.g. BME, disabled) as defined by the Equality Act 2010, will be measured using the University Corporate Performance Framework. The alignment of equality to key performance indicators will ensure that performance can be measured, reviewed and reported on tri- annually via annual performance reviews and quality review.
Your monitoring arrangements. In your existing 2012-13 access agreement, you set out how you intended to monitor your fulfilment of your agreement. If you wish to add anything further, following the inclusion of ITT in your agreement, you may do so here. The Student Experience and Widening Participation Subcommittee (SEWPSC) of the Teaching Committee oversees the IOE’s WP activity and reports to the Senate. The widening participation action plan is due for review and renewal for 2012 which will take place alongside the development of the new IOE Strategic Plan for 2012-2017. The new IOE Strategic Plan will take account of new methods of partnership for ITT provision, different modes of delivery and different types of students accessing our services. Our goals and objectives for widening participation will therefore require considerable review to ensure that they remain current in the rapidly changing external environment. Recommendations for improving and developing WP activity are made by members to the SEWPSC and then received by the Teaching Committee. In addition the WP Champion and Deputy Champion act as critical friends in different areas of the Institute, further informing our provision. Both are members of SEWPSC and Teaching Committee, and the WP Champion is also a member of the Senior Leadership Team. These practices will continue and through these processes the development of WP provision is assured. In 2012, we will also recruit to a new post within the IOE management structure which will have Institute-wide responsibility for widening participation, outreach activities and financial support. This member of staff will take forward the delivery of our activities, monitoring of performance and will be responsible for the development of our widening participation strategy. It is recognised however that for PGCE programmes in particular, 2012-13 is a transitional year. It is not yet clear what the impact of the new fees and funding regime for new entrants will be on the diversity of our student population, although early reports from the sector indicate that applications for places in 2012-13 are significantly lower than for 2011-12 entry. We therefore regard 2012-13 as a transitional year, where we will need to monitor the intake to our PGCE programmes carefully, and redefine our targets, goals and aspirations accordingly. During the transitional year, the IOE will be developing a broader range of performance monitoring data, to effectively monitor progress towards the targets...
Your monitoring arrangements. In your existing 2012-13 access agreement, you set out how you intended to monitor your fulfilment of your agreement. If you wish to add anything further, following the inclusion of ITT in your agreement, you may do so here. The arrangements already described in the University of Bristol’s 2012/13 Access Agreement will be extended to encompass monitoring of the ITT elements described in this Annex Analysis will also be undertaken in line with that expected under the prevailing Ofsted standards. Annex A Part five: Information to students
Your monitoring arrangements. In your existing 2012-13 access agreement, you set out how you intended to monitor your fulfilment of your agreement. If you wish to add anything further, following the inclusion of ITT in your agreement, you may do so here. The post holders described above with responsibility for recruitment and retention will be required to monitor and report on progress in liaison with the relevant officers in the Outreach Team. Other monitoring and evaluation arrangements will fall under our main access agreement.
Your monitoring arrangements. In your existing 2012-13 access agreement, you set out how you intended to monitor your fulfilment of your agreement. If you wish to add anything further, following the inclusion of ITT in your agreement, you may do so here. The monitoring arrangements will be the same as for our main Access Agreement, as follows: We are committed to an evidence based approach to our outreach activities, ensuring that our access policies are effective and add value. We will put in place a framework for monitoring and evaluation that will capture the impact of our portfolio of access activities, including collaborative activities to replace and go further than the existing Aimhigher partnerships. This will be reported annually via our WP Strategic Assessment report to OFFA. Monitoring will be based on our performance against XXXX XXx. We welcome developments by OFFA with UCAS, HEFCE and the SLC to develop better central data Annex A that will monitor the impact of the changes. We will work to actively support and make use of the Unique Student Number to track the trajectory of students with whom we have interacted at secondary school & Further Education level. Internally the senior leader responsible for this agreement will be the Pro Vice-Chancellor (Education). The governance framework will include the University Programmes Committee (QA) and the Education & Student Experience Advisory Group (Policy). The University Strategic Planning process with Faculties and Professional Services will fully embrace the achievement of the targets in this Access Agreement and report via the University Executive Group to the University Council who are the ultimate point of accountability. The University Programmes Committee, the Education & Student Experience Advisory Group and the University Council all include within their membership representatives of the Students’ Union, and we will continue the active, positive and productive relationship with the Southampton University Students’ Union (SUSU) to enable the delivery of our plans. Part five: Information to students
Your monitoring arrangements. In your existing 2012-13 access agreement, you set out how you intended to monitor your fulfilment of your agreement. If you wish to add anything further, following the inclusion of ITT in your agreement, you may do so here. Our internal systems provide us with a baseline data against which we can measure our progress on XXXX and gender. As data on social class is not readily available we intend to collect data locally to establish SEG and FIF to provide a robust baseline from which to set at three year target. The TDA require all providers to complete an annual Self Evaluation Document (SED). Monitoring and evaluation of the targets proposed in the access agreement would be integrated with other impact data collection for the SED.
