Xxxxxx Ltd. Protected Know-how: AURA software library and adapters for graphs, text and signals including associated algorithms. SDE signal data search engine and pattern match controller. Face recognition methods. Graph matching methods. PRESENCE II/III hardware and associated firmware. FaceEnforce recognition engine, calibration software and enrolement software. Patent No. or File No.: Text matching. UK grant: GB2351572B, EPO 1196890 and associated applications and grants in other countries. Image Recognition. UK grant: GB2384095 PCT 1472645 and associated applications and grants in other countries Image recognition II. UK application 0323662.7 PCT EP2004/052502 University of Hull All “Pre-existing Know-how" which has been accumulated by the University of Hull is excluded except for that “Pre-existing Know-how" which has been accumulated by those researchers of the University of Hull identified explicitly in the contract. Furthermore, right of access is only granted to “Pre-existing Know-how" that is relevant to the project and that these rights are limited to academic purposes for other parties of the project. Where this “pre-existing know-how” is embedded within software then right of access is restricted to “Limited Source Code Access”. Additional rights to this software will be considered by the University of Hull on a case by case basis. Specific exclusions are:
Xxxxxx Ltd. Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Plastering Ltd. Xxxxxx X. Xxxxx Masonry Barrie Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Construction Ltd. Xxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Psychiatric Hospital Hamilton Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx & Co. Lad. Montreal, PQ Hans & Xxxxxxx Limited Elginburg/ Xxxxxxxx Xxxx & Xxxxxxx Masonry Kingston Xxx Xxxxxx Xxxxx Falls KRK Xxxxxx Masonry Ltd. Edmonton Hanz & Xxxxxxx Ltd. Glenburnie Haramac Const. Co. Ltd. St. Xxxxxx/ London Harbridge & Cross Ltd. Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Masonry Inc. Kitchener Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Ltd. Manotick
Xxxxxx Ltd. [1946] 1 Ch. 242, were cited as authorities to the contrary, but in my opinion it is a mistake to regard them as deciding that a contract in breach of a section such as s. 67 is not void ...” Again in Xxxxx x. Xxxxxx (1915) 20 C.L.R. 663 at p. 671 Xxxxxx and Gavan Xxxxx XX. said: “When a Statute prohibits a transaction either expressly or by implication, no such transaction can be validly created.” (underlining mine); and as referred to by Xxxxx J. in In Re: Xxxxxxxx (supra): “The law which forbids its existence cannot consistently recognize it as ever having any binding force.” These citations alone should be conclusive of the point. For an interesting discussion of the justification of the word “void”, see Cheshire and Fifoot, op. cit. para. 1304. It is not necessary however in the present case to rely upon any differentiation between the labels of “unenforceable” or “void” as attaching to a contract of this kind. The plaintiff seeks to derive some means of escape by reliance upon a proposition that the disability under which the contract laboured was merely unenforceability, which was lifted when the law with which it was in conflict changed. That misses the point that the very basis of unenforceability is public policy against
Xxxxxx Ltd. By: /s/ Xxxxx Xxxxx-Xxxxx By: /s/ Xxxxx Xxxx Name: Xxxxx Xxxxx-Xxxxx Name: Xxxxx Xxxx Title: VP Business Development Title: CEO Date: 18/12/12 Date: 3/12/12 XXXXXX HEALTHCARE X.X. XXXXXX LTD. By: /s/ Xxx Xxxxx By: /s/ Gil Efron Name: Xxx Xxxxx Name: Gil Efron Title: Finance Director Title: CFO Date: 19/12/12 Date: 3/12/12 EXHIBIT A CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS: This Exhibit A has been redacted in its entirety.* * Confidential portions of this document have been redacted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. EXHIBIT B VOLUME / PRICE: Product Period and manufacturing phase Price Per Kilogram Estimated, non-binding, maximum Quantities [*****] [*****] [*****] [*****] The parties shall agree on appropriate mechanisms for Forecasting and Purchase Orders under Section 2 “Orders and Supply”, [*****] days of execution of this Agreement. The foregoing quantities pertain to Product manufactured through filtration process. Each manufacturing pool consists exclusively of either recovered or source plasma.
Xxxxxx Ltd a corporation incorporated in Bermuda with its registered office at Clarendon House, Church Street West, Hamilton, Bermuda (the Managers)
Xxxxxx Ltd. Distribution. If between the Closing Date and the second anniversary of the Closing Date, (a) XxXxxx Ltd. is not the subject of administration or liquidation proceedings in England or Wales (or similar proceedings in another jurisdiction) (the “Proceedings Event”) and (b) no winding up petition has been issued in England or Wales (or an analogous claim or petition issued in another jurisdiction) against XxXxxx Ltd (the “Wind Up Event,” and each of the Proceedings Event and Wind Up Event, an “Insolvency Event”) and (c) no assertion of any claim is made or any action or lawsuits have been filed which allege to be, or could become, 4.15(n) Losses (as defined in Section 10.2(c) of the Purchase Agreement) (a “4.15 Claim”), then XxXxxx Turbine and Seller shall deliver a Joint Instruction to the Escrow Agent to release $6,975,000 to Seller. As reasonably practical after receipt of such Joint Instruction, but in no event later than 2 Business Days after such receipt, the Escrow Agent shall release $6,975,000 to Seller. Notwithstanding anything in the preceding sentence, if any other Claim(s) has been made for an amount that is greater than the amount that would remain in the Escrow Account if the release under this section is made, then the Escrow Agent shall release only such amount so that the Escrow Account would have sufficient funds to pay such other Claim(s), and shall release the balance of the $6,975,000, if any, as soon as all such other Claims are resolved.
Xxxxxx Ltd. 3.1(a) Xxxxxx Management 3.1(a) Xxxxxx Oil and Gas Interests 8.15 Xxxxxx Well 8.15 Subsidiary 3.1(a) Superior Offer 4.2(g) Surviving Corporation 1.3(a) Tax 3.1(i) Tax Return 3.1(i) Taxes 3.1(i) Termination Fee 7.2(b) Total Merger Consideration Value 2.1(b) Uncertificated Shares 2.7(a) Voting Debt 3.1(b)(i) AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER This AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER, dated as of May 10, 2006 (this "Agreement"), is made by and among Range Resource Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("Parent"), Range Acquisition Texas, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Merger Sub"), and Xxxxxx Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company").
Xxxxxx Ltd. (the "Vendor") to construct a Home (the "Home") in accordance with the floor plans and specifications attached hereto as Schedules “B”, “C” and “D” (collectively, the "Unit") on the following terms and conditions:
Xxxxxx Ltd. 3. The meaning of words and phrases used in this Agreement and its Schedules shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Condominium Act, S.O. 1998, C.19, the regulations thereunder and any amendments thereto (the "Act") and other terms used herein shall have ascribed to them the definitions in the Condominium Documents unless otherwise provided for as follows:
