Xx, X. X. Xxx, X. Xxxxxxxx, X. X. Barcelona, X. X. Xxxxxx, Field application of nitrogen and phenylacetylene to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from landfill cover soils: Effects on microbial community structure. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 89, 189–200 (2011).
Xx, X. No. of <kV> CT i) <R-Phase> ii) <Y-Phase> iii) <B-Phase> C) Modules <Make: > <W>, < W > <Total: Nos.> X.Xx. of Main<ABT> Meter> X.Xx. of Check <ABT Meter> X.Xx. of Standby <ABT Meter> Metering Equipment installed at Receiving end on dated: <> 220 kV SS, <>, <>, (<Distt.>) D) Switchgear Panels <Make/Type:> <Sr. No.> Protection Provided: Under/Over voltage, Over current & Earth fault. The Commissioning date of various equipment is as under: <kV> line from --- to -----, completed on date --. Line Bay at < kV > GSS, ------ charged for ---- on --. <kV> line charged from ------to-------- on date --. Main & check metering commissioned on ……… (initial record of Main/Check meters at the time of Commissioning is to be taken and enclosed) Complete system commissioned on date-------- The Joint Inspection Report of metering arrangement & copy of permission of Electrical Inspector is enclosed herewith. ATTACHMENT – 5 SAMPLE SYNCHRONIZATION CERTIFICATE It is certified that ----- MW (Capacity) Solar Photovoltaic Power Project of M/s. -----, Village Tehsil/ Taluka --------, District ---------- was Grid connected on ………. (Date) at Hrs. It is further certified that the Project was synchronized and supply of power into the grid from the Project connected on ………… (Date) at Hrs. The above certificate is issued on the basis of MRI record. NB:
Xx, X. X.; Xxx, L. Y.; Xxx, X. S. Single-Molecule Enzymatic Dynamics. Science 1998, 282, 1877–1882.
Xx, X. X. XXXXXXXXX, a natural person, (Strengers);
Xx, X. X.; Xxxx, X., Int. J. Mol. Med. 2004, 14, 959-970. 46. Xxxxxx, X.; Xxxxxxxxxx, X., Drug Resist. Update 2005, 8, 131-146.
Xx, X. Xxxxxxxxxxx, “A Conceptual Nanofluid Injection System Design for In-Vessel Retention Enhancemen”, Trans. Am. Nuc. Soc., vol.96, pp.304-305, 2007.
Xx, X. X. XXXXXX: Yes, that is right. I remember that clearly. I am keen to know what will happen to these towns. Will they become ghost towns with tumbleweeds rolling through them? I understand that all the services in the town have been transferred and the homes have been on-sold. I pegged a few mining leases under the old system years ago. Under the old system, people used to dig a trench and stick a post in the corner and attach a little notice to it. A few unscrupulous people would come along and take the notice off. It is all done differently now. I understand that the transition has been made and that the assets that the company continues to hold under the state agreement are located on mineral leases. I am concerned to know whether those sorts of assets are normally returned to the state under other state agreements. The facilities will not be returned but will continue to be used by the company to process some of its other products. Smaller mining companies that take on the leases will also use them. I think there were originally 340 leases, of which 280 have been jettisoned. Some of the others that are to be jettisoned will be taken over by small miners, which will use the facilities that the company is retaining. It seems to me, therefore, that the transition has been handled particularly well. I will make some mention, if I may, of the main economic benefit to the state from these state agreements; that is, of course, royalty revenue. To encourage people to develop resources, particularly in the early days of the state, the state gave concessions and received enormous royalties. I looked at the Auditor General’s report of June 2004 to see what sort of royalties the state received from these agreements. At page 15 of the report, table 2 deals with mining royalties for 2002-03. It shows that the royalty revenue for iron ore was $287 million but that the concession exemptions amounted to $43.5 million; the royalty revenue for diamonds was $89 million; for gold, $85 million; for petroleum, $73 million; for nickel, $57 million; for alumina, $55 million; for mineral sands, $26 million; for coal, $16 million; for base metals, $14 million; for tin, titanium and lithium, $6 million; for manganese, $3 million; for salt and limestone, $2 million; and for other products, $9 million. Therefore, for that financial year this state received $724 million in royalties from state agreements. The Auditor General reports states — The reasons for royalty concessions in the...
Xx, X. Xxx X., Xxx X. (2013) The Backbone of DSM Implementation: Energy Service Companies. In: Integrated Resource Strategic Planning and Power Demand-Side Management. Power Systems.
Xx, X. X.X and its members UNIONS/KAE are obliged to permit the entrance in the courts where the games will take place of the technicians and sportscasters etc, employees of NETHOLD and to facilitate them during the performance of their work, by providing the suitable and secured conditions. For example they should facilitate the installation of recording, processing and transfer of signal equipment, the access to the cameramen and sports casters to the appropriate, according to their judgement, areas upon the condition that they do not hinder the Secretary, the arbitrators, the games, and the rest factors of the games during the performance of their duties etc.
Xx, X. X.X promises to NETHOLd that in the framework of the above cooperation it will support the events (press conferences, receptions etc) that NETHOLD will organize for the promotion of their cooperation and provides to NETHOLD the exclusive right of the tv transmission of such events (draw, Commencement of the championship etc)
