Working Papers Sample Clauses

Working Papers. Monitors should prepare and organize their working papers in a manner that helps provide an appropriate quality review. The Monitors should avoid preparing or accumulating unnecessary working papers or making extensive copies of the Subrecipient records. It is neither necessary nor practical for the monitors to document every matter considered during the review. Documentation supporting all findings must be retained in the working file. Good working papers should meet the monitoring requirements by displaying the following characteristics:

Working Papers. Your grant award packet includes Working Papers. The Working Papers ask for basic information needed to create a contract: • Contact information for the person who will administer the grant once the contract is signed. Grant documents and correspondence will be sent to this person. • Your Statewide Vendor Number (SWV#) • Your Federal Indirect Rate • Your fiscal year end date • Name and title for the person authorized by the jurisdiction to sign the contract Please complete and return the Working Papers to the Commerce project manager identified in the award letter as soon as possible, even if you do not plan to begin drawing your funds for a while. Your project manager will manage your contract until project completion. Feel free to give us a call if you have any questions as you fill out the form (see contact information on previous page).

Working Papers. A. The Contractor shall retain its working papers of the Agency's audit conducted pursuant to this Contract for a period of at least five (5) years after the date shown on the opinion letter of the audit report, or longer if requested by the federal cognizant agency for audit, oversight agency for audit, pass through-entity or the State Auditor. The State Auditor shall have access to the working papers at the State Auditor's discretion. When requested by the State Auditor, the Contractor shall deliver the original or clear, legible copies of all working papers to the requesting entity. B. The Contractor should follow the guidance of AU-C 210 A.27 to A.31 and AU-C 510 .A3 to .A11 in communications with the predecessor auditor and to obtain information from the predecessor auditor's audit documentation.

Working Papers. To the extent working papers may be required by law, a copy of the Juvenile’s working papers must be filed with Equity by the Juvenile’s first day of rehearsal.

Working Papers. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Clause 3, our working papers and other internal documentation created during the performance of the Services will belong exclusively to us, and will not be provided to you.

Working Papers. The Minor's working papers, where required, must be filed with the applicable state authorities (copy to Equity) by the Minor's first day of employment.

Working Papers. Acemoglu D and Xxx XX, ‘Innovation by Entrants and Incumbents’ (2010) National Bureau of Economic Research NBER Working Papers 16411, <xxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxx/papers/w16411.pdf> accessed 14 October 2016 Xxxxxxx X and Xxxxxxxxx A, ‘A Study of IPR Policies and Practices of a Representative Group of Standards Setting Organizations Worldwide’ (2012) National Academies of Science <xxxx://xxx. org/10.2139/ssrn.2333445> accessed 14 October 2016 Xxxxxxxxx G and Xxxxxxx AD ‘Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral’ (1972). Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 1983. Xxxxxx XX and Slowak AP ‘Why Blu-ray vs. HD-DVD is not VHS vs. Betamax: The Co-evolution of Standard-setting Consortia’, Promotionsschwerpunkt Globalisierung und Beschaeftigung No. 29/2009. Xxxxxxxx X, ‘A Few Useful Things to Know about Machine Learning’ (2012) <xxxx://xxxxx. xx.xxxxxxxxxx.xxx/~xxxxxx/xxxxxx/xxxx00.xxx> accessed 14 October 2016 Xxxxxxxx XX, ‘Double or Nothing: Technology Transfer Under the Xxxx-Xxxx Act’ (2013) NYU Law and Economics Research Paper No. 13 <xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/publication/256056032_ Double_or_Nothing_Technology_Transfer_Under_the_Bayh-Dole_Act> accessed 14 October 2016 Xxxx-Xxxxx N, Xxxxxx-Xxxxxxx J and Xxxxxxxx D, ‘The Link between Public Support and Private R&D Effort: What Is the Optimal Subsidy?’ (2010) Institut d’Economica de Barcelona Working Papers 2011/12 <xxxx://xxx.xxx.xx.xxx/aplicacio/fitxers/2011/6/Doc2011-12.pdf> accessed 14 October 2016 Einer, E ‘The Failed Resurrection of the Single Monopoly Profit Theory’ (February 11, 2010). Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 10-16. Xxxxxxx XX, ‘What Is So Special about Intangible Property? The Case for Intelligent Carryovers’ (2010) Xxxx X. Xxxx Program in Law and Economics Working Paper No 524 <xxxx://xxxxxxxxxxxxxx. xxxxxxxx.xxx/xxx/xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx?article=1301&context=law_and_economics> accessed 14 October 2016

Working Papers. All statements, records, schedules, working papers and memoranda made by Contractor incident to, or in the course of, rendering Work to HACLA pursuant to this Contract, except for the deliverables submitted by Contractor to HACLA and except for records which held by HACLA and are part of HACLA's records, shall be and remain the property of Contractor in the absence of an express agreement between Contractor and HACLA to the contrary. No such statements, records, schedules, working papers, or memoranda shall be sold, transferred, or bequeathed, without the consent of HACLA, to anyone other than HACLA’s licensee, successor’s, or assigns, or any combined or merged firm or successor in interest to Contractor.

Working Papers. MNP owns all working papers and files, other materials, reports and work created, developed or performed during this engagement, including intellectual property used in the preparation thereof. MNP may, but is under no obligation to, agree to provide Plaintiff’s Counsel with a copy of all practitioner- prepared working papers necessary for Plaintiff’s Counsel’s records. MNP may develop software, including spreadsheets, documents, databases, and other electronic tools, to assist us with this engagement. Where these tools are developed specifically for MNP’s purposes and without consideration of any purpose for which Plaintiff’s Counsel might use them, any such tools provided to Plaintiff’s Counsel are made available on an "as is" basis only, and remain the exclusive intellectual property of MNP, and are not to be distributed to or shared with any third party and MNP shall be entitled to the return of all such property, uncopied, at any time. Additionally, Plaintiff’s Counsel acknowledges that no reliance can be placed on draft reports, conclusions, or advice, whether oral or written, issued by MNP as the same may be subject to further work, revision and other factors which may mean that such drafts are substantially different from any final report or advice issued.

Working Papers. Working papers are to be retained by the audit firm and must be available for examination by SCDSS or its designee for at least three (3) years following the issuance of the audit report to the auditee. Retention of working papers beyond three (3) years is required where questioned costs and/or practices have not been resolved with DSS.