Virtual Collocation Interconnection Sample Clauses

The Virtual Collocation Interconnection clause establishes the terms under which one party may interconnect its equipment with another party’s network infrastructure without physically placing its own equipment on the premises. Instead, the service provider manages and maintains the necessary equipment on behalf of the interconnecting party, who accesses the network remotely. This arrangement is commonly used in telecommunications to facilitate network access while minimizing the need for physical space and on-site presence. The core function of this clause is to enable efficient network interconnection while reducing logistical and operational burdens associated with physical collocation.
Virtual Collocation Interconnection. When CLEC provides its own facilities or uses the facilities of a third party to an SBC-AMERITECH Tandem or, at CLEC’s option, End Office and wishes for SBC-AMERITECH to place transport terminating equipment at that location on CLEC’s behalf, CLEC may Interconnect using the provisions of Virtual Collocation as set forth in Article XII or applicable tariff. Virtual Collocation allows CLEC to choose the equipment vendor and does not require that CLEC be Physically Collocated.
View SourceView Similar (13)
Virtual Collocation Interconnection. When AT&T provides its own facilities or uses the facilities of a third party to an SBC-AMERITECH Tandem or, at AT&T’s option, End Office and wishes for SBC-AMERITECH to place transport terminating equipment at that location on AT&T’s behalf, AT&T may Interconnect using the provisions of Virtual Collocation as set forth in Article XII or applicable tariff. Virtual Collocation allows AT&T to choose the equipment vendor and does not require that AT&T be Physically Collocated.
View SourceView Similar (4)
Virtual Collocation Interconnection. 3.2.1 When LEVEL 3 provides its own facilities or uses the facilities of a 3rd party to a SBC-13STATE Tandem or End Office and requests that SBC-13STATE place transport terminating equipment at that location on LEVEL 3’s behalf, LEVEL 3 may Interconnect using the provisions of Virtual Collocation as set forth in Appendix Virtual Collocation or applicable state tariff. Virtual Collocation allows LEVEL 3 to choose the equipment vendor and does not require that LEVEL 3 be Physically Collocated.
View Source
Virtual Collocation Interconnection. 9.1 Subject to space availability and technical feasibility, PACIFIC will provide Virtual Collocation in accordance with the Act, the FCC rules promulgated thereunder (e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 51.323), and any Commission decision. Unless inconsistent with this Section 9, Virtual Collocation Interconnection will be provided as set forth in Pacific B▇▇▇'▇ interstate Virtual Collocation tariffs (Pacific B▇▇▇'▇ Tariff FCC No.128). 9.1.1 If Pac-West designates permitted telecommunications equipment for Virtual Collocation that is not set forth in Pacific B▇▇▇'▇ interstate tariff, the provisioning of such telecommunications equipment shall be handled in the same manner as is used by PACIFIC for provisioning non-tariffed equipment under its interstate Virtual Collocation tariffs; provided, however, that in no event shall PACIFIC be required to file any tariff, whether interstate or intrastate in jurisdiction. By way of example and not limitation, Pac-West would apply for, and PACIFIC would price, provide, and b▇▇▇ such telecommunications equipment as if under PACIFIC's interstate virtual collocation tariff. 9.2 When providing Virtual Collocation, PACIFIC will, at a minimum, install, maintain, and repair Virtual Collocation equipment for Pac-West within the same time periods and with failure rates that are no greater than those that apply to the performance of similar functions for comparable equipment of PACIFIC. 9.3 PACIFIC will provide Virtual Collocation in "Eligible Structures", as defined in Appendix PHYSICAL COLLOCATION, which may be added by written amendment to this Agreement and permit the Virtual Collocation of telecommunications equipment permitted by 47 U.S.C. § 251(c) (6), FCC rules promulgated thereunder (e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 51.323), and Commission decisions. 9.3.1 Notwithstanding any other provision hereof, PACIFIC is under no obligation to provide and shall not provide Virtual Collocation for any equipment that, by its nature or due to its characteristics and methods of operation, interferes with or impairs service over PACIFIC's network, equipment, or facilities, or the network, equipment, or facilities of any other person or entity; creates hazards for or cause damage to those networks, equipment, or facilities, the Premises, or the Eligible Structure; impairs the privacy of any communications carried in, from, or through the Eligible Structure; or creates hazards or cause physical harm to any person, entity, or the public. The terms "Premises" and "Elig...
View Source

Related to Virtual Collocation Interconnection

  • Interconnection Customer’s Interconnection Facilities The Interconnection Customer shall design, procure, construct, install, own and/or control the Interconnection Customer’s Interconnection Facilities described in Appendix A at its sole expense.

  • Interconnection Facilities 4.1.1 The Interconnection Customer shall pay for the cost of the Interconnection Facilities itemized in Attachment 2 of this Agreement. The NYISO, in consultation with the Connecting Transmission Owner, shall provide a best estimate cost, including overheads, for the purchase and construction of its Interconnection Facilities and provide a detailed itemization of such costs. Costs associated with Interconnection Facilities may be shared with other entities that may benefit from such facilities by agreement of the Interconnection Customer, such other entities, the NYISO, and the Connecting Transmission Owner. 4.1.2 The Interconnection Customer shall be responsible for its share of all reasonable expenses, including overheads, associated with (1) owning, operating, maintaining, repairing, and replacing its own Interconnection Facilities, and

  • Two-Way Interconnection Trunks 2.4.1 Where the Parties use Two-Way Interconnection Trunks for the exchange of traffic between Frontier and Onvoy, Onvoy, at its own expense, shall: 2.4.1.1 provide its own facilities to the technically feasible Point(s) of Interconnection on Frontier’s network in a LATA; and/or 2.4.1.2 obtain transport to the technically feasible Point(s) of Interconnection on Frontier’s network in a LATA (a) from a third party, or, (b) if Frontier offers such transport pursuant to a Frontier access Tariff, from Frontier. 2.4.2 Where the Parties use Two-Way Interconnection Trunks for the exchange of traffic between Frontier and Onvoy, Frontier, at its own expense, shall provide its own facilities to the technically feasible Point(s) of Interconnection on Frontier’s network in a LATA. 2.4.3 Prior to establishing any Two-Way Interconnection Trunks, Onvoy shall meet with Frontier to conduct a joint planning meeting (“Joint Planning Meeting”). At that Joint Planning Meeting, each Party shall provide to the other Party originating Centum Call Seconds (Hundred Call Seconds) information, and the Parties shall mutually agree on the appropriate initial number of End Office and Tandem Two-Way Interconnection Trunks and the interface specifications at the technically feasible Point(s) of Interconnection on Frontier’s network in a LATA at which the Parties interconnect for the exchange of traffic. Where the Parties have agreed to convert existing One-Way Interconnection Trunks to Two-Way Interconnection Trunks, at the Joint Planning Meeting, the Parties shall also mutually agree on the conversion process and project intervals for conversion of such One-Way Interconnection Trunks to Two-Way Interconnection Trunks. 2.4.4 On a semi-annual basis, Onvoy shall submit a good faith forecast to Frontier of the number of End Office and Tandem Two-Way Interconnection Trunks that Onvoy anticipates Frontier will need to provide during the ensuing two (2) year period for the exchange of traffic between Onvoy and Frontier. Onvoy’s trunk forecasts shall conform to the Frontier CLEC trunk forecasting guidelines as in effect at that time. 2.4.5 The Parties shall meet (telephonically or in person) from time to time, as needed, to review data on End Office and Tandem Two-Way Interconnection Trunks to determine the need for new trunk groups and to plan any necessary changes in the number of Two-Way Interconnection Trunks. 2.4.6 Two-Way Interconnection Trunks shall have SS7 Common Channel Signaling. The Parties agree to utilize B8ZS and Extended Super Frame (ESF) DS1 facilities, where available. 2.4.7 With respect to End Office Two-Way Interconnection Trunks, both Parties shall use an economic Centum Call Seconds (Hundred Call Seconds) equal to five (5). Either Party may disconnect End Office Two-Way Interconnection Trunks that, based on reasonable engineering criteria and capacity constraints, are not warranted by the actual traffic volume experienced. 2.4.8 Two-Way Interconnection Trunk groups that connect to a Frontier access Tandem shall be engineered using a design blocking objective of ▇▇▇▇- ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇.005 during the average time consistent busy hour. Two-Way Interconnection Trunk groups that connect to a Frontier local Tandem shall be engineered using a design blocking objective of ▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ B.01 during the average time consistent busy hour. Frontier and Onvoy shall engineer Two-Way Interconnection Trunks using Telcordia Notes on the Networks SR 2275 (formerly known as BOC Notes on the LEC Networks SR-TSV-002275). 2.4.9 The performance standard for final Two-Way Interconnection Trunk groups shall be that no such Interconnection Trunk group will exceed its design blocking objective (B.005 or B.01, as applicable) for three (3) consecutive calendar traffic study months. 2.4.10 Onvoy shall determine and order the number of Two-Way Interconnection Trunks that are required to meet the applicable design blocking objective for all traffic carried on each Two-Way Interconnection Trunk group. Onvoy shall order Two-Way Interconnection Trunks by submitting ASRs to Frontier setting forth the number of Two-Way Interconnection Trunks to be installed and the requested installation dates within Frontier’s effective standard intervals or negotiated intervals, as appropriate. Onvoy shall complete ASRs in accordance with OBF Guidelines as in effect from time to time. 2.4.11 Frontier may (but shall not be obligated to) monitor Two-Way Interconnection Trunk groups using service results for the applicable design blocking objective. If Frontier observes blocking in excess of the applicable design objective on any Tandem Two-Way Interconnection Trunk group and Onvoy has not notified Frontier that it has corrected such blocking, Frontier may submit to Onvoy a Trunk Group Service Request directing Onvoy to remedy the blocking. Upon receipt of a Trunk Group Service Request, Onvoy will complete an ASR to establish or augment the End Office Two-Way Interconnection Trunk group(s), or, if mutually agreed, to augment the Tandem Two-Way Interconnection Trunk group with excessive blocking and submit the ASR to Frontier within five (5) Business Days. 2.4.12 The Parties will review all Tandem Two-Way Interconnection Trunk groups that reach a utilization level of seventy percent (70%), or greater, to determine whether those groups should be augmented. Onvoy will promptly augment all Tandem Two-Way Interconnection Trunk groups that reach a utilization level of eighty percent (80%) by submitting ASRs for additional trunks sufficient to attain a utilization level of approximately seventy percent (70%), unless the Parties agree that additional trunking is not required. For each Tandem Two- Way Interconnection Trunk group with a utilization level of less than sixty percent (60%), unless the Parties agree otherwise, Onvoy will promptly submit ASRs to disconnect a sufficient number of Interconnection Trunks to attain a utilization level of approximately sixty percent (60%) for each respective group, unless the Parties agree that the Two-Way Interconnection Trunks should not be disconnected. In the event Onvoy fails to submit an ASR for Two-Way Interconnection Trunks in conformance with this Section, Frontier may disconnect the excess Interconnection Trunks or bill (and Onvoy shall pay) for the excess Interconnection Trunks at the applicable Frontier rates. 2.4.13 Because Frontier will not be in control of when and how many Two-Way Interconnection Trunks are established between its network and Onvoy’s network, Frontier’s performance in connection with these Two-Way Interconnection Trunk groups shall not be subject to any performance measurements and remedies under this Agreement, and, except as otherwise required by Applicable Law, under any FCC or Commission approved carrier- to-carrier performance assurance guidelines or plan. 2.4.14 Onvoy will route its traffic, or traffic belonging to its Interconnected VoIP Provider Customers, to Frontier over the End Office and Tandem Two-Way Interconnection Trunks in accordance with SR-TAP-000191, including but not limited to those standards requiring that a call from Onvoy to a Frontier End Office will first be routed to the End Office Interconnection Trunk group between Onvoy and the Frontier End Office.

  • Participating TO’s Interconnection Facilities The Participating TO shall design, procure, construct, install, own and/or control the Participating TO’s Interconnection Facilities described in Appendix A at the sole expense of the Interconnection Customer. Unless the Participating TO elects to fund the capital for the Participating TO’s Interconnection Facilities, they shall be solely funded by the Interconnection Customer.

  • One-Way Interconnection Trunks 2.3.1 Where the Parties use One-Way Interconnection Trunks for the delivery of traffic from Onvoy to Frontier, Onvoy, at ▇▇▇▇▇’s own expense, shall: 2.3.1.1 provide its own facilities for delivery of the traffic to the technically feasible Point(s) of Interconnection on Frontier’s network in a LATA; and/or 2.3.1.2 obtain transport for delivery of the traffic to the technically feasible Point(s) of Interconnection on Frontier’s network in a LATA (a) from a third party, or, (b) if Frontier offers such transport pursuant to a Frontier access Tariff, from Frontier. 2.3.2 For each Tandem or End Office One-Way Interconnection Trunk group for delivery of traffic from Onvoy to Frontier with a utilization level of less than sixty percent (60%) for final trunk groups and eighty-five percent (85%) for high usage trunk groups, unless the Parties agree otherwise, Onvoy will promptly submit ASRs to disconnect a sufficient number of Interconnection Trunks to attain a utilization level of approximately sixty percent (60%) for all final trunk groups and eighty-five percent (85%) for all high usage trunk groups. In the event Onvoy fails to submit an ASR to disconnect One-Way Interconnection Trunks as required by this Section, Frontier may disconnect the excess Interconnection Trunks or bill (and Onvoy shall pay) for the excess Interconnection Trunks at the rates set forth in the Pricing Attachment. 2.3.3 Where the Parties use One-Way Interconnection Trunks for the delivery of traffic from Frontier to Onvoy, Frontier, at Frontier’s own expense, shall provide its own facilities for delivery of the traffic to the technically feasible Point(s) of Interconnection on Frontier’s network in a LATA.