Validation of completeness Sample Clauses

Validation of completeness. The metadata checksum file is part of the files to be submitted. For each entity type, the required type of checksum is listed. For now, no checksum is requested, only, a logical row count is requested for each entity type. This count indicates the number of instances of an entity type that is appropriate for this entity type in accordance with the logical data model. Please note that this concerns all entities in the logical data model including reference data and entity types like “entity type delivery” and not only those in the physical data deliveries: the logical data model also requires a row count and checksum for those entity types that do not have a corresponding .csv file to be delivered.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Validation of completeness. It details the new process on reporting rowcount in entity type delivery. Updated the hyperlinks to the webpage of DNB that contains the AnaCredit information.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
Validation of completeness. The metadata checksum file is part of the files to be submitted. For each entity type, the required type of checksum is listed. For now, only, a logical row count is requested for each entity type that is logically part of the reporting requirement. The entity types that are part of the reference data do not require a rowcount. All entity types whose rowcount is to be reported is marked with a rowcount reporting indicator value set to “entity type with reported rowcount”. This rowcount 12 Sending in a new AnaCredit data exchange for the same obligation (reporting ID, reporting reference date, data delivery code) while the status of the previous delivery is Received, will result in a validation error of the newly submitted data exchange. 13 In time, these signalling rules are meant to be changed to ‘blocking’. 14 These are signalling rules that require data outside the scope of the data delivery set. indicates the number of instances of an entity type that is appropriate to this entity type in accordance with the logical data model. Please note that this concerns the entity types in the logical data model where the attribute ‘reporting reference date’ is part of the primary key, and not only those entity types in the physical data deliveries. The logical data model also requires a row count and checksum for those entity types that do not have a corresponding .csv file to be delivered.
Sample 1Sample 2
Validation of completeness. The metadata checksum file is part of the files to be submitted. For each entity type, the required type of checksum is listed. For now, only, a logical row count is requested for each entity type that is logically part of the reporting requirement. The entity types that are part of the reference data do not require a rowcount. All entity types whose rowcount is to be reported is marked with a rowcount reporting indicator value set to “entity type with reported rowcount”12. This rowcount indicates the number of instances of an entity type that is appropriate to this entity type in accordance with the logical data model. Please note that this concerns the entity types in the logical data model where the attribute ‘reporting reference date’ is part of the primary key, and not only those entity types in the physical data deliveries. The logical data model also requires a row count and checksum for those entity types that do not have a corresponding .csv file to be delivered.
Sample 1Sample 2
Validation of completeness. ‌ The metadata checksum file is part of the files to be submitted. For each entity type, the required type of checksum is listed. For now, no checksum is requested, only, a logical row count is 12 Sending in a new AnaCredit data exchange for the same obligation (reporting ID, reporting reference date, data delivery code) while the status of the previous delivery is Received, will result in a validation error of the newly submitted data exchange. 13 In time, these signalling rules are meant to be changed to ‘blocking’. 14 These are signalling rules that require data outside the scope of the data delivery set. requested for each entity type. This count indicates the number of instances of an entity type that is appropriate to this entity type in accordance with the logical data model. Please note that this concerns the entities in the logical data model and not only those in the physical data deliveries: the logical data model also requires a row count and checksum for those entity types that do not have a corresponding .csv file to be delivered.
Sample 1
Validation of completeness. ‌ The metadata checksum file is part of the files to be submitted. For each entity type, the required type of checksum is listed. For now, no checksum is requested, only, a logical row count is requested for each entity type. This count indicates the number of instances of an entity type that is appropriate to this entity type in accordance with the logical data model.
Sample 1

Related to Validation of completeness

  • Completeness The Work contained all of the attributes and elements required by this Agreement; and

  • Certification of Completion Certification of completion of the program will be contingent upon Resident successfully completing the core requirements of the Program, returning all property of the Medical Center such as books, equipment, etc., and having settled any other professional or financial obligations to the Medical Center. The certificate will be issued in accordance with the provisions of the ASHP Regulations on Accreditation of Pharmacy Residencies and signed by the RPD and the Chief Executive Officer of the organization. A certificate will not be issued to anyone who does not complete the program’s requirements. Core requirements to successfully complete the program include: • Possess a valid pharmacist license from the Pennsylvania State Board of Pharmacy by October 31st of the residency year. • Successful completion of core learning experiences and required longitudinal learning experiences as defined in the learning experience descriptions • Completion of all R1 goals/objectives with a status of achieved by the end of the residency. Completion of 100% of the remaining goals/objectives for the program with at least 50% of the objectives having a status as achieved. All objectives must have a minimum status of satisfactory progress. • All evaluations must be completed in accordance with ASHP Accreditation Standard as outlined in the Resident Agreement • Completion of pharmacokinetic certification by October 31 of residency year • Completion of inpatient anticoagulation certification by October 31 of residency year. • Completion of major project, which includes meeting all project deadlines and submission of written manuscript of completed project to the RAC. • Assigned projects (MUE, drug review, class review, and management project) have been completed • Presentation of at least one major CME program. • Completion of minimum staffing requirements as described in section 2.7 • Adherence to the organization’s attendance standards and as described in this document under Exhibit A.

  • Certification of Compliance The Owner may permit the use, prior to sampling and testing, of certain materials or assemblies when accompanied by manufacturer's certificates of compliance stating that such materials or assemblies fully comply with the requirements of the contract. The certificate shall be signed by the manufacturer. Each lot of such materials or assemblies delivered to the work must be accompanied by a certificate of compliance in which the lot is clearly identified. Materials or assemblies used on the basis of certificates of compliance may be sampled and tested at any time and if found not to be in conformity with contract requirements will be subject to rejection whether in place or not. The form and distribution of certificates of compliance shall be as approved by the Owner. When a material or assembly is specified by "brand name or equal" and the Contractor elects to furnish the specified "brand name", the Contractor shall be required to furnish the manufacturer's certificate of compliance for each lot of such material or assembly delivered to the work. Such certificate of compliance shall clearly identify each lot delivered and shall certify as to:

  • Response/Compliance with Audit or Inspection Findings A. Grantee must act to ensure its and its Subcontractors’ compliance with all corrections necessary to address any finding of noncompliance with any law, regulation, audit requirement, or generally accepted accounting principle, or any other deficiency identified in any audit, review, or inspection of the Contract and the services and Deliverables provided. Any such correction will be at Grantee’s or its Subcontractor's sole expense. Whether Xxxxxxx's action corrects the noncompliance shall be solely the decision of the System Agency.

  • Declaration of Compliance Within 90 days of the HSP’s fiscal year-end, the Board will issue a Compliance Declaration declaring that the HSP has complied with the terms of this Agreement. The form of the declaration is set out in Schedule G and may be amended by the LHIN from time to time through the term of this Agreement.

  • EFFECT OF COMPLIANCE Compliance with and fulfillment of this Agreement shall be deemed to resolve all issues raised in the NOV.

  • Certification of Accuracy The following parties have reviewed the information above and certify, to the best of their knowledge, that the information they have provided is true and accurate. Landlord's Signature Date: Print Name: Tenant’s Signature Date: Print Name: Tenant’s Signature Date: Print Name: Agent’s Signature Date:

  • Inspection and Testing Each Constructing Entity shall cause inspection and testing of the Interconnection Facilities that it constructs in accordance with the provisions of this section. The Construction Parties acknowledge and agree that inspection and testing of facilities may be undertaken as facilities are completed and need not await completion of all of the facilities that a Constructing Entity is building.

  • Inspection and Tests 3.8.1 The Procuring entity or its representative shall have the right to inspect and/or to test the goods to confirm their conformity to the Contract specifications. The Procuring entity shall notify the tenderer in writing in a timely manner, of the identity of any representatives retained for these purposes.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.