U.S. Forest Service. The U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service (hereinafter called USFS) mission is to achieve quality land management under the sustainable multiple-use management concept to meet the diverse needs of the people (16 U.S.C. § 1641-1646). In accordance with 7 U.S.C. § 3318(b), the USFS is authorized to enter into a joint venture agreement to assist in providing agricultural research and teaching activities.
U.S. Forest Service. Xx. Xxxx Xxx Deputy Program Manager USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station 00 Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxx 000 Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, XX 00000 Phone: (000) 000-0000 Fax: (000) 000-0000 xxxx@xx.xxx.xx Xx. Xxxx Xxxx Research Aquatic Ecologist Urban Forests, Human Health, and Environmental Quality USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station, Baltimore Field Station 0000 Xxxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxx; Xxxxx 000 Baltimore, MD 21228 Phone: (000) 000-0000 xxxxxx@xx.xxx.xx Administrative Contact: Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Grants Management Specialist USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station 0000 Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx St. Xxxx, MN 55108 Phone: (000) 000-0000 Fax: (000) 000-0000 xxxxxxxxxxxxx@xx.xxx.xx
U.S. Forest Service. The Santa Fe, Carson, Lincoln, Gila, Cibola, Apache-Sitgreaves, and Rio Grande National Forest Land and Resource Management Plans (Forest Plans) provide guidance for all resource management activities on the National Forests affected by this Agreement (NFs; 16 U.S.C. § 1604). The Forest Plans establish management standards and guidelines that ensure habitat is managed to provide for the diversity of plant and animal species and the persistence of native species in the planning area. Both RGC and RGS are currently identified as Regional Forester Sensitive Species in both Region 2 (Colorado) and Region 3 (Arizona, Texas, and New Mexico). The current Forest Plans provide guidance and direction to manage Sensitive Species, which are not currently federally listed as endangered or threatened, to sustain viability and prevent the need for future listing as threatened or endangered. If a species is proposed for listing, Forest actions will be evaluated to determine the effect of management practices on habitat and the need for conferencing with FWS. If a species is listed, consultation with FWS will be required. Conservation activities will be pursued where applicable and areas where Sensitive Species occur will be managed to maintain and/or enhance habitat. The Santa Fe, Carson, Lincoln, Gila, Cibola and Rio Grande National Forests are currently in various stages of plan revision under the 2012 planning rules (36 CFR Part 219). The new forest planning rule does not use Sensitive Species, but has replaced it with Species of Conservation Concern (SCC). Species of Conservation Concern are species known to occur in the plan area and for which the regional forester has determined that the best available scientific information indicates substantial concern about the species’ capability to persist over the long-term in the plan area. The development teams for the revised Forest Plans on the Xxxxxx, Santa Fe, and Cibola NFs in New Mexico and the Rio Grande NF in Colorado have identified the RGC and RGS as SCC. The Gila NF has identified RGS as SCC. The Lincoln NF is early in development but has identified RGC as a potential SCC. As SCC, the revised Forest Plans on these NFs must contain Forest Plan components that maintain the ecological conditions necessary for RGC and RGS long-term viability.
U.S. Forest Service. Xx. Xxxx Xxx Deputy Program Manager USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station 00 Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxx 000 Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, XX 00000 Phone: (000) 000-0000 Fax: (000) 000-0000 xxxx@xx.xxx.xx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Grants & Agreements Specialist USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station 0000 Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx St. Xxxx, MN 55108 Phone: (000) 000-0000 Fax: (000) 000-0000 xxxxxxxxxxxxx@xx.xxx.xx
U.S. Forest Service. 1. The General Mining Law of May 10, 1872, as amended (30 U.S.C. 22, et seq.).
U.S. Forest Service. The first Supplemental Project Agreement (SPA) for the initial Demo project work has been signed.
U.S. Forest Service. Technical Representative(s) Xxxxxx X. Xxx Project Leader Northern Research Station U.S. Forest Service 000 XXXX Xxxx Xxxxxxxxxx xx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, XX 00000 Phone: (000) 000-0000 xxx 000 xxxx@xx.xxx.xx Administrative Representative(s) Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Grants Management Specialist Northern Research Station U.S. Forest Service 0000 Xxxxxxx Xxx St. Xxxx, MN 55108 Phone: (000) 000-0000 xxxxxxxxxxxxx@xx.xxx.xx
U.S. Forest Service. Xx. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxxx USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station National Agroforestry Center East Campus University of Nebraska Xxxxxxx, XX 00000-0000 (000) 000-0000x00 (phone) (000) 000-0000 (fax) xxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xx.xxx.xx Dr, Xxxxxx Xxxxx USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Forest Sciences Laboratory South Dakota School of Mines and Technology 501 East St. Xxxxxx Street Rapid City, SD 00000 (000) 000-0000 (phone) (000) 000-0000 (fax) xxxxxx@xx.xxx.xx
U.S. Forest Service. Forest Supervisor (Richfield) Forest Fire Management Officer (Richfield) Moab/Monticello Ranger District Ferron/Price/Sanpete Ranger District South Zone FMO North Zone FMO AFMO – Operations AFMO- Operations Eng. 641 (L) Eng. 451 (H) Abajo Wildland Fire Module Eng. 1031 (H) Moab Monticello Monticello Price Eng. 611 (L) Ephraim Skyline Initial Attack Module Ephraim Bureau of Land Management Canyon Country District Manager Fire Management Officer Assistant Fire Management Officer Fire Operations Specialist (FOS) Moab Helitack (Type 3) Eng. 6618 (L) Eng. 6619 (L) Moab Moab Monticello Price Fire Cache Eng.6313 (H) Eng. 6314 (H) WT 6216 Moab Moab Moab Moab State of Utah Forestry, Fire, and State Lands Southeastern Utah Area Manager Wasatch Front Area Manager Central Utah Area Manager Fire Management Officer Fire Management Officer Fire Management Officer Fire Warden Fire Warden Fire Warden Fire Warden Fire Warden Fire Warden Fire Warden 3A801 3A803 3A802 3A304 3A702 3A701 3A703 Xxxxx/Carbon Co. San Xxxx Co. Grand Co. Utah Co. Sanpete Co. Xxxxxx Co. Juab Co.
U.S. Forest Service. All U.S. Forest Service (USFS) lands in the watershed are located in the upper Battle Creek watershed, upstream of the Restoration Project Area and outside the area that will be adaptively managed. However, the upper watershed is important in that its condition can potentially influence the quality of aquatic habitat in downstream reaches. The Lassen National Forest has been conducting a few limited programs in the upper Battle Creek watershed related to stream restoration and fuels assessment. These have included several road restoration measures such as culvert replacement, which are intended to reduce sediment delivery to the stream. In the summer of 2000, the USFS assessed wildfire fuels and aquatic/riparian habitat in the Battle Creek watershed under a contract with BCWC. Results of this assessment are expected in 2002.94 IV.B.3. Proposed Comprehensive Fisheries Management Plan for the Upper Sacramento River and Tributaries CDFG is beginning to draft a comprehensive fisheries management plan for the upper Sacramento River and tributaries in 2001. The objective of this plan is to take a watershed-wide, fisheries management-based view at production potential and population levels of all races of anadromous salmonids. Specific goals will be set for each upper Sacramento River tributary that will integrate the production potential of each stream, as well as the main river, from a system perspective. Perennial anadromous salmonid- producing tributaries that will be addressed in this plan include Clear, Cow, Cottonwood, Battle, Deer, Mill, and Antelope Creeks, while other streams that occasionally produce anadromous salmonids in good water years include Sulfur, Churn, and Bear Creeks. Questions regarding Battle Creek will be developed during this open planning process.
