Common use of Unsatisfactory Clause in Contracts

Unsatisfactory. This rating indicates that the performance of the evaluatee is unacceptable or has failed to show sufficiently improved performance from a Needs Improvement rating. In accordance with the provisions of the California Education Code, an “Unsatisfactory” rating may result in appropriate administrative action including non-retention. For full- time faculty, poor performance in the categories of Section 18.2.3 may lead to an overall unsatisfactory rating.

Unsatisfactory. This rating indicates that the performance of the evaluatee is unacceptable below minimum standards or has failed to show sufficiently improved performance from a Needs Improvement rating. In accordance with the provisions of the California Education Code, an “Unsatisfactory” rating may result in appropriate administrative action including non-non- retention. For full- full-time faculty, poor performance in the categories of Section 18.2.3 may lead to an overall unsatisfactory rating.

Unsatisfactory. This rating indicates that the performance of the evaluatee is unacceptable below minimum standards or has failed to show sufficiently improved performance from a Needs Improvement rating. In accordance with the provisions of the California Education Code, an “Unsatisfactory” rating may result in appropriate administrative action including non-retention. For full- full-time faculty, poor performance in the categories of Section 18.2.3 may lead to an overall unsatisfactory rating.

Unsatisfactory. This rating indicates that the performance of the evaluatee is unacceptable below minimum standards or has failed to show sufficiently improved performance from a Needs Improvement rating. In accordance with the provisions of the California Education Code, an “Unsatisfactory” rating may result in appropriate administrative action including non-retention. For full- time faculty, poor performance in the categories of Section 18.2.3 may lead to an overall unsatisfactory rating.administrative

Unsatisfactory. This rating indicates that the performance of the evaluatee is unacceptable below minimum standardsunacceptable or has failed to show sufficiently improved performance from a Needs Improvement rating. In accordance with the provisions of the California Education Code, an “Unsatisfactory” rating may result in appropriate administrative action including non-retention. For full- full-time faculty, poor performance in the categories of Section 18.2.3 may lead to an overall unsatisfactory rating.