Unresolved Findings for Recovery Sample Clauses

Unresolved Findings for Recovery. CONSULTANT affirmatively represents and warrants that it is not subject to any unresolved finding for recovery issued by the Auditor of State under Ohio Revised Code Section 9.24, or that it has taken the appropriate remedial steps required under Section 9.24, or that it otherwise qualifies under that section.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Unresolved Findings for Recovery. The Contractor warrants that as of the date of Contractor's execution of this Agreement, the Contractor has no unresolved findings for recovery as issued by the Auditor of State pursuant to Section 9.24 of the Ohio Revised Code.
Unresolved Findings for Recovery. Ohio Revised Code Section 9.24 prohibits the award of a contract to any Agency against whom the Auditor of the State has issued a finding for recovery, if the finding for recovery is “unresolved” at the time of the award. By executing this contract, the Agency warrants that it is not now, and will not become subject to an “unresolved” finding for recovery under the Ohio Revised Section 9.24.
Unresolved Findings for Recovery. The Department shall not award a contract for goods, services, or construction, paid for in whole or in part with State funds, to any Contractor against whom a finding for recovery has been issued by the auditor of state, if the finding for recovery is unresolved, pursuant to the provisions of § 9.24 of the Ohio Revised Code. Contractor warrants that it is not subject to an "unresolved" finding for recovery under O.R.C. § 9.24. If the warranty is deemed to be false, the contract is void ab initio and the Contractor must immediately repay to the State any funds paid under this contract. If the Contractor does have any unresolved finding(s) for recovery subsequent to the award of this contract, the Contractor must immediately notify the Department of such finding(s).
Unresolved Findings for Recovery. Our firm is not subject to any unresolved finding for recovery issued by the Auditor of State under Ohio Rev. Code § 9.24, or our firm has taken appropriate remedial steps required under R.C. § 9.24. Our firm agrees that if this statement is deemed to be false, the contract shall be declared “void ab initiobetween the parties, and _City of Pataskala will not be obligated to pay for goods or services rendered under the contract. Any funds paid under the contract shall be remitted by our firm to City of Pataskala or an action for recovery of such payments may result. ✔ Affirmed
Unresolved Findings for Recovery. The CONTRACTOR certifies that the CONTRACTOR is not subject to a finding for recovery under ORC 9.24, or it has taken the appropriate remedial steps required, or otherwise qualifies under ORC 9.24 to contract with the State of Ohio. The Auditor of the State of Ohio Findings for Recovery Database is located at xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxx.xxxxx.xx.xx/resources/findings/certified/default.aspx
Unresolved Findings for Recovery. Our firm is not subject to any unresolved finding for recovery issued by the Auditor of State under Ohio Rev. Code § 9.24, or our firm has taken appropriate remedial steps required under R.C. § 9.24. Our firm agrees that if this statement is deemed to be false, the contract shall be declared “void ab initiobetween the parties, and _CITY OF CENTERVILLE will not be obligated to pay for goods or services rendered under the contract. Any funds paid under the contract shall be remitted by our firm to CITY OF CENTERVILLE or an action for recovery of such payments may result. ✔ Affirmed
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Unresolved Findings for Recovery

  • Claims Review Findings a. Narrative Results.‌‌

  • Audit Findings Vendor shall implement any required safeguards as identified by Citizens or by any audit of Vendor’s privacy and security controls.

  • Sole Source as Grounds for Rejection of a Change Order If a Change Order is submitted to Contractor for the purposes of adding a Bulletin to this Contract and said Bulletin designates a Sole Source from which Contractor is required to procure goods or services necessary to perform the Work, which Sole Source has not been designated previously, Contractor shall be entitled to reject the proposed Change Order if the designated Sole Source refuses to provide to Contractor the warranties, bonds, terms or schedule required under the Contract Documents, including any warranty or terms or schedule required by Bulletins referenced in the proposed Change Order. In such event, Contractor shall give written notice to the Owner rejecting the proposed Change Order and, if possible, shall accompany said written notice with a proposal from Contractor for changes or modifications to the Bulletin so as to eliminate the Sole Source designation but to achieve goods or services equal in quality or function. The Owner may then require the Design Professional to revise the subject Bulletin so as to eliminate the designation of the Sole Source by incorporation of Contractor's proposal or otherwise. Upon revision of the Bulletin by the Design Professional and approval thereof by the Owner, the Owner shall again submit to the Contractor a proposed Change Order for the purpose of adding the revised Bulletin to this Contract. If the Owner decides to retain the Sole Source in the Change Order and Contractor cannot acquire the full contractually required warranties from the Sole Source, Contractor shall be held only to the warranty terms and schedule obtainable from the Sole Source.

  • Price Adjustments for OGS Centralized Contracts Periodic price adjustments will occur no more than twice per year on a schedule to be established solely by OGS. Pricing offered shall be fixed for the first twelve (12) months of the Contract term. Such price increases will only apply to the OGS Centralized Contracts and shall not be applied retroactively to Authorized User Agreements or any Mini-bids already submitted to an Authorized User. Price Decreases Price decreases may be made at any time. Additionally, some price decreases shall be calculated in accordance with Appendix B, section 17, Pricing.

  • Submission of Certified Payroll Transcripts for Public Works Contracts Only Contractors and Subcontractors on public works projects must submit monthly payroll transcripts to the Authorized User that has prepared or directs the preparation of the plans and specifications for a public works project, as set forth in the Bid Specifications. For Mini-Bid solicitations, the payroll records must be submitted to the entity preparing the agency Mini-Bid project specification. For “agency specific” Bids, the payroll records should be submitted to the entity issuing the purchase order. For all other OGS Centralized Contracts, such records should be submitted to the individual agency issuing the purchase order(s) for the work. Upon mutual agreement of the Contractor and the Authorized User, the form of submission may be submitted in a specified disk format acceptable to the Department of Labor provided: 1) the Contractor/Subcontractor retains the original records; and, (2) an original signed letter by a duly authorized individual of the Contractor or Subcontractor attesting to the truth and accuracy of the records accompanies the disk. This provision does not apply to Article 9 of the Labor Law building services contracts.

  • Suspension Pending Investigation When, in the judgment of the President, the presence of a Faculty Member on University property presents a threat to the health or safety of the Faculty Member or anyone in the University community or represents a threat of substantial disruption or substantial interference with the normal and lawful activities of the University community, the President may suspend with pay the Faculty Member pending the disposition of the disciplinary process provided in this Agreement. The President may also direct that the Faculty Member be removed and barred from University property. Such suspensions shall not be invoked in an arbitrary or capricious manner, and shall end upon the conclusion of the Article 9 investigation or, if discipline is proposed, at the end of any subsequent grievance proceeding.

  • Manufacturer's Recommendations All work or materials shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and requirements. The Contractor shall obtain the manufacturer’s recommendations and requirements, for its use at the Site in executing the Work, copies of bulletins, circulars, catalogues, or other publications bearing the manufacturer’s titles, numbers, editions, dates, etc. If the manufacturer’s recommendations and requirements are not available, the Contractor shall request installation instructions from the Design Professional.

  • Cost Recovery for RSTEP Requests by Registry Operator for the approval of Additional Services pursuant to Section 2.1 may be referred by ICANN to the Registry Services Technical Evaluation Panel (“RSTEP”) pursuant to that process at xxxx://xxx.xxxxx.xxx/en/registries/rsep/. In the event that such requests are referred to RSTEP, Registry Operator shall remit to ICANN the invoiced cost of the RSTEP review within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of a copy of the RSTEP invoice from ICANN, unless ICANN determines, in its sole and absolute discretion, to pay all or any portion of the invoiced cost of such RSTEP review.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 9. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan. SCHEDULE 5

  • Resolution of disputes and grievances (a) For the purpose of this clause 14, a dispute includes a grievance.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.