Unit Member Evaluation. The evaluation of a unit member shall take into consideration the particular nature of the unit member’s assignment, including such factors as class size, the presence or absence of aides, and the availability of materials and work space for preparation, duplication, and record keeping.
Unit Member Evaluation. Evaluation is a collegial process whereby professional assessments of the instructional process are shared and competent personnel are developed and/or encouraged. Evaluation should improve instruction through a constructive, positive, humanistic approach.
Unit Member Evaluation. The Board and the Association share the belief that the primary purpose of teacher evaluation is to improve delivery of the instructional program for the district’s students. Other functions of the formal evaluation process include:
Unit Member Evaluation. A. The Board and the Association agree that the primary purposes of the A&S evaluation system are to appraise the performance of unit members and to assist unit members to improve their effectiveness in performing their job responsibilities. The evaluation system also provides MCPS with information from which professional development programs can be developed, personnel selection procedures can be appraised, and adequacy of human and material resources can be assessed.
Unit Member Evaluation. Evaluation is an ongoing process with the primary purpose of assessing and improving the professional performance of the unit member. A unit member shall be provided assistance to correct difficulties and afforded reasonable time to incorporate recommended changes per the evaluation instruments.
Unit Member Evaluation. 2 As per Education Law 3012c all unit members will be evaluated annually. The 3 observation and evaluation of all unit members is the responsibility of the administration. 4 Emphasis shall be placed on the improvement of instruction.
Unit Member Evaluation. The evaluation shall take into consideration the particular nature of the evaluatee's assignment, including such factors as class size, the presence or absence of aides, and the availability of materials and work space for preparation, duplication, and record keeping. Forms available for different job types are available in Appendix D. Deadline dates are listed on each form. The stated deadlines shall be implemented for full-year assignments, with deadlines for assignments oflesser duration being prorated accordingly. If an evaluatee works less than 75% of the school year, the evaluation will not count as meeting the requirements of the evaluation cycle. Evaluatees shall submit to their evaluator, no less than one (1) duty day prior to the scheduled conference, goals along with measurement activities related thereto, to be considered in the annual evaluation. The evaluator and the evaluatee shall conference and discuss these matters. Evaluatees shall submit to their evaluator, no less than one (1) duty day prior to the scheduled Final Evaluation Conference, their summary and evidence. If an evaluatee has filed a complaint against a site administrator, the evaluatee may request the Director of Human Resource to change their evaluator.
Unit Member Evaluation. 1. The Board and the Association agree to implement the OTES model for evaluation for the duration of this contract.
Unit Member Evaluation. A. Observation of the work performance of all Unit Members will be conducted openly. Formal observation sessions shall be with the full knowledge of the Unit Member. All other observations of the Unit Member's work performance that are to be made part of his/her file will be made known to the Unit Member.
Unit Member Evaluation. Evaluation shall be an on-going process. The supervisor or administrator shall bring any performance concerns to the unit member’s attention as the administrator becomes aware of them. When a performance concern has been identified, the administrator and member shall meet to address the concern.
