Types of Evaluation. Short-form and Long-form Evaluations
Types of Evaluation. 23.1.1 Biennial/Annual Evaluation The purpose of Biennial/Annual Evaluation is to evaluate the faculty member at his or her current rank expectation.
Types of Evaluation. Tenure decisions will be based primarily on Supervisory evaluations with input from students.
Types of Evaluation. Process • What resources or inputs are needed to meet program requirements? • What activities are being conducted? • How well are activities being conducted? • Do activities comply with program requirements? • Have grantees accomplished their stated objectives? • What outputs have been produced from the activities?
Types of Evaluation. 10.2.1 A probationary regular or term employee shall be evaluated by the appropriate Director/delegate in an all-inclusive way at least once a year. An employee who has held regular employee status for at least two (2) years shall be evaluated in an all-inclusive way once every three (3) years. An auxiliary employee shall be evaluated in an all-inclusive way as opportunity allows and as determined by the appropriate Director/ delegate. In the absence of an all-inclusive evaluation in a given year, the employee's performance shall be assumed to be satisfactory. Student questionnaires will be administered by the College once each duty year, be retained by the appropriate Director, and the results of the three (3) years' data be included in the all-inclusive evaluation.
Types of Evaluation. In the evaluation of a program there are essentially two types of evaluation to be distinguished: process evaluation and product evaluation. Process evaluation is considered to be the evaluation of the functioning of a program. Questions to be answered might be “‘which activities are deployed within the program’, ‘what type of clients participate in the program’, ‘which clients leave the program before completion’ and ‘which segments of the program require improvement’” (21, p377). Several types of process evaluation have been established, one of them being evaluation of implementation, to establish whether or not a program has been implemented as planned. Another type of process evaluation is the so-called formative evaluation, through which strengths and weaknesses of the program are identified. This is commonly done by asking clients and staff of the program about the quality of aspects of the program (21). Product evaluation addresses the results of a program by establishing meaningful change in clients. Product evaluation can be related to certain norms or standards that are supposed to be reached, or it can be aimed at the establishment of the presence of change, either in a prospective or retrospective design. In a prospective design at least two measurements are taken: one before the start of the program and one after completion of the program. In a retrospective design there are only post- program measurements taken. The most commonly known and used type of product evaluation is effect evaluation, which is deployed to establish not only the presence of change but also the presence of a causal relationship between the program and the observed change (21). As such this type of evaluation requires the 121 use of a control group. Usually, control groups are constructed in one of three ways: post hoc, at the beginning of a program through a matching process or through randomized assignment (true experiment). Typically, random assignment is viewed as the best approach (17; 43). To determine the success of a program obviously product evaluation and especially effect-evaluation is important. Unless it can be established that a program results in positive change in clients ánd that this change can be ascribed foremost to the program under evaluation, the success of a program remains uncertain. For this purpose the ideal choice is that of a Randomized Controlled Trial with a baseline and post-intervention measurement. However, process evaluation is importan...
Types of Evaluation a. Annual Evaluation
Types of Evaluation
