Turkey. Lender represents and warrants that all:
Turkey. If You use the UPS My Choice® Personal and Commercial Services in Turkey:
Turkey. To the extent a Data Controller in Turkey or its Authorized Users intend to enter Personal Data into the Service, Customer agrees to first obtain the consent of each Data Subject to an International Transfer as contemplated under this Exhibit if and to the extent required under the applicable data protection law in Turkey. The Customer hereby confirms and commits that it has received the Personal Data and informed the related persons regarding the transfer/process of the Personal Data in accordance with the applicable law.
Turkey. These country specific provisions apply if either Party is located in Turkey. In such case, the following shall be added to the end of Section 2.7: If Your Content contains Personal Data (as this term is defined in the Data Privacy Terms) or if Personal Data is otherwise transferred to us pursuant to the DSA or other applicable regulations, you represent that you have obtained the relevant individuals’ consent on the cross-boundary transfer and provided them with the relevant privacy notices to the extent necessary under applicable data privacy laws.
Turkey. Notifications
Turkey. The follow language is inserted as Section 12.6 The parties agree that herein limitation of liability shall not include the damages caused by an action with malicious/gross fault of a party in accordance with the provision of the Turkish Code of Obligations numbered 6098.
Turkey. The term "
Turkey. No country specific provisions. Ukraine
Turkey. The following is added at the end of Section 15: Licensee undertakes to keep all information of trade secret nature strictly private and confidential, and to use all necessary measures and its best efforts in order to assure and maintain the confidentiality thereof and to prevent and protect it, or any part thereof, from disclosure to any third person. Furthermore, Licensee hereby expressly undertakes:
Turkey. In this case, an explosion occurred on a municipal rubbish tip, killing thirty-nine people who had illegally built their dwellings around it. Nine members of the applicant’s family died in the accident. Although an expert report had drawn the attention of the municipal authorities to the danger of a methane explosion at the tip two years before the accident, the authorities had taken no action. The Court found that since the authorities knew – or ought to have known – that there was a real and immediate risk to the lives of people living near the rubbish tip, they had an obligation under Article 2 to take preventive measures to protect those people. The Court also criticised the authorities for not informing those living next to the tip of the risks they were running by living there. The regulatory framework in place was also considered to be defective.”). 143 Öneryıldız v. Turkey (48939/99) [2002] ECHR 491, para.64. 144 See discussion of cases before human rights bodies, immediately above. rights to life and health.145 Other human rights that toxic dumping may implicate are the “right of peoples to self-determination and permanent sovereignty over natural resources, (and) the right to development”.146 Internationally, toxic dumping and the movement of hazardous wastes is regulated by the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal of 1989 (“The Basel Convention”). The annexes to the Basel Convention provide a list of the controlled or prohibited substances, and the convention essentially requires authorization for any movement or storage of such materials if an international frontier is involved. Under the International Law Commission’s Articles on the Prevention of Transboundary Harm from Hazardous Activities, where a dispute cannot be resolved through consultation or negotiation within 6 months, a party may engage compulsory fact-finding procedures by an impartial commission.147 Some domestic systems address toxic dumping and the consequent environmental harm on a regular basis and have developed sophisticated legal codes to curb the practice and condemn transgressors.148 While these domestic legal proceedings do not constitute a form of public international law, they provide illustrations of the widespread occurrence of environmental harm and criminal proceedings to repress that harm, and can provide indications of state practice.149 However, many domestic systems are incapable of addressing such pr...
