Transportation Issues. Does your agency supply transportation to participants? YES NO If YES, please specify steps taken to ensure equal access to transportation services for persons with disabilities as for other clients. Authorized Signature Date Print Name Title Subcontractor Name Rev. 5/15 Attachment A CERTIFICATION REGARDING DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS As required by the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988, the Subcontractor certifies that it will or will continue to provide a drug-free workplace by:
Transportation Issues. Congestions is clearly the most significant transportation issue facing south Florida. Miami was ranked as the fifth most congested urban area in the U.S., with commuters spending approximately 64 hours a year in traffic jam (Sun Sentinel, 2018). Pedestrian fatalities is another transportation issue for south Florida and the entire state of Florida. The state of Florida has had a very high pedestrian fatality rate over the years (GHSA, 2020). Increasing active transportation and public transit use via complete street projects appear to be a solution that can address both issues (USDOT, 2015b).
Transportation Issues. For all shipments, consignee is responsible for inspection and documentation of material condition during receipt and unloading. Freight damage that occurs when a load is shipped FOB “Mill” (Prepaid or Collect) to the customer is not the responsibility of ArcelorMittal Dofasco. Claims for product damaged in transit must be processed through the carrier by the customer. Freight damage that occurs when a load is shipped “FOB Customer” must be reported to ArcelorMittal Dofasco within 24 hours of delivery. Consignee is responsible for storing and protecting material from further deterioration while claim is being resolved.
Transportation Issues. When did the product arrive, and when was it expected?
Transportation Issues. Does your agency supply transportation to participants? ϒ YES ϒ NO If YES, please specify steps taken to ensure equal access to transportation services for persons with disabilities as for other clients. Signature of Person Completing Form Date Please Print Name Title of Signatory
Transportation Issues. You will not be eligible for a refund based on any inability to use your Pass due to any road closures, traffic issues, parking constraints at or near the Resort/Bike Parks, flight cancellations, or transportation issues. Other Bike Park and Alpine Resort Management may implement a range of measures and actions to respond to the pandemic conditions, including requiring guests to wear face coverings and observe social distancing and other pandemic related guidelines. These measures may include implementing a reservation system or closing some or all of the Resorts/Bike Parks for part or all of the season. Our pandemic measures will change from time to time, and we require all Pass Holders and guests, as a condition of access and or use of Bike Park and Alpine Resorts to regularly check our website and other communications to stay abreastof current measures and requirements at our Resorts. It is a condition of use of the Season Pass that the Pass Holder follow all directions and requirements in place from time to time to maintain health andsafety at our Bike Park and Alpine Resorts, including without limitation: i. Providing, upon request, a pandemic health declaration; ii. Wearing a face covering; iii. Observing social distancing requirements; iv. Permitting us to provide personal and / or health information to public health authorities wherewe are required by law to do so or where the authority has a legal right to request such information to assist with contact tracing. Failure to follow such directions and requirements may result in forfeiture of the Season Pass and / orother benefits and being required to leave the resort/Bike Park. You acknowledge and agree that it is your responsibility to follow and observe all directions and requirements in place from time to time to maintain health andsafety at our Bike Parks and Alpine Resorts, including observing social distancingrequirements, and that we have no liability for any failure to do so. You acknowledge and agree that, despite measures and actions taken to maintain health and safety at our Bike Parks and Alpine Resorts, we are unableto prevent or avoid all risks relating to pandemic conditions in the alpine environment and you accept personal responsibility and liability for any and allrisks relating to pandemics while at our Resorts/ Bike Parks. The Resorts may be required to operate to specific capacity constraints due tothe COVID-19 pandemic, which will require inventory controlled, reserved access ...
Transportation Issues. The proposed project would result in an increase in vehicle miles travelled. In addition, the proposed project could create the potential for on- and off-site circulation issues. Approach W-Trans will prepare a traffic study to address the non-CEQA issues of traffic operation and parking and will also prepare the Transportation Section of the EIR addressing vehicle miles traveled (VMT). See Attachment D for W-Trans’ detailed scope of work.
Transportation Issues. As discussed in more detail in the May 1, 2008, IRP, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued an order on August 6th 2007, accepting tariff sheets proposed by Questar Pipeline to modify its gas quality provisions.1 These gas quality provisions established cricondentherm-hydrocarbon-dew-point (CHDP) zones with CHDP limits for each zone effective January 1, 2008.2 These zones and their limits are shown in Exhibit 7.2. Questar Gas believes that the implementation of these CHDP zones and limits has worked well during 2008 and early 2009 as no major gas quality 1 Questar Pipeline Company, Docket No. RP07-457-000, FERC Gas Tariff Filing, May 18, 2007. 2 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Questar Pipeline Company, Docket No. RP07-457-000, “Order Accepting Tariff Sheets,” Issued August 6, 2007. issues have arisen. These CHDP provisions appear to be an effective long-term solution to equitably resolving gas quality matters. It is difficult to predict the interchangeability of future gas streams received by Questar Gas. The Company may need to arrange for additional processing or blending in the event it is required to ensure that the gas received from the transmission systems of either Questar Pipeline or Kern River Gas Transportation Company (Kern River) are compatible with the needs of Questar Gas’ customers. Also of interest this year are developments in Xxxx River’s rate case. Questar Gas is a shipper on Xxxx River’s system holding 50,000 decatherms per day of seasonal capacity and 3,000 decatherms per day of year-round capacity made available from Xxxx River’s 2003 Expansion Project. On April 30, 2004, Kern River filed a Section 4 rate case with the FERC. A Presiding Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) issued an initial decision on March 2, 2006, addressing many cost-of-service and rate-design issues.3 On October 19, 2006, the FERC issued Opinion No. 486.4 Requests for rehearing of Opinion No. 486 were addressed in Opinion No. 486-A, issued on April 18, 2008, resolving most issues, with the notable exception of return on equity (XXX).5 On January 15, 2009, the FERC issued Opinion No. 486-B.6 This Opinion articulated, for the first time, the new FERC policy of including master limited partnerships in the rate-of-return proxy group, making this a landmark opinion. Opinion 486-B also established an XXX of 11.55 percent and ordered Xxxx to file, within 45 days, a compliance filing incorporating that XXX in its rates. Of note in the Xxxx Rate case is th...
