Traditional Evaluation Sample Clauses

Traditional Evaluation. A permanent teacher select- 17 ing this method of evaluation will participate in a pre- 18 observation conference, a full-period observation and a 19 post-observation conference. The result of this process 20 will be a summary letter of evaluation written by the 21 administrator of record. The administrator of record 22 and the teacher shall meet in the pre-evaluation confer- 23 ence and mutually agree to the elements upon which 24 the evaluation is to be based. These elements shall be 25 based upon the California Standards for the Teaching 26 Profession (see “Forms”) and include: 1) objectives 27 set for the specific lesson(s) to be observed, 2) means 28 for assessing whether these objectives were met, and
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Traditional Evaluation. Upon request of the unit member or the evaluator, a meeting may be held to discuss the evaluation process.
Traditional Evaluation. An evaluation conducted by an administrator that entails at least two classroom observations (one per semester) and a summative final evaluation report and conference. Temporary, probationary 1, probationary 2 teachers, teachers with emergency or provisional credentials, and on cycle permanent teachers will be evaluated by an administrator using the traditional evaluation process, except in the case of a permanent teacher who is participating in the alternative evaluation process. As part of the traditional evaluation process, there will be a minimum of two formal observations (one per semester) during the school year in addition to regular informal observations. For non-tenured members there will be a minimum of two formal observations in the first semester and a minimum of one formal observation in the second semester. Formal observations will be announced in advance by the administrator. Following a formal observation, the administrator will provide the unit member with a written observation report. A post- observation meeting will be held at the request of either the administrator or the unit member.
Traditional Evaluation. A permanent teacher select- 10 ing this method of evaluation will participate in a pre- 11 observation conference, a full-period observation and a 12 post-observation conference. The result of this proc- 13 ess will be a summary letter of evaluation written by 14 the administrator of record. The administrator of re- 15 cord and the teacher shall meet in the pre-evaluation 16 conference and mutually agree to the elements upon 17 which the evaluation is to be based. These elements 18 shall include: 1) objectives set for the specific les- 19 son(s) to be observed, 2) means for assessing whether 20 these objectives were met, and 3) a review of how this 21 lesson fits into the overall curriculum.
Traditional Evaluation. Process 9 These procedures apply to all temporary and probationary unit members and those 10 permanent unit members who are being evaluated with the traditional process.
Traditional Evaluation. An evaluation conducted by an administrator that entails at least two classroom observations (one per semester) and a summative final evaluation report and conference The site administration of each high school shall have the responsibility for evaluation of unit members.
Traditional Evaluation. A permanent teacher 5 selecting this method of evaluation will partici- 6 xxxx in a pre-observation conference, a full-period 7 observation and a post-observation conference. 8 The result of this process will be a summary letter 9 of evaluation written by the administrator of re-
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Traditional Evaluation 

Related to Traditional Evaluation

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. All monitoring or observation of the work performance of a teacher shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the teacher.

  • Formal Evaluation All formal evaluations of personnel shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the employee concerned by an administrator or supervisor of the District.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following:

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • Job Evaluation The work of the provincial job evaluation steering committee (the JE Committee) will continue during the term of this Framework Agreement. The objectives of the JE Committee are as follows: • Review the results of the phase one and phase two pilots and outcomes of the committee work. Address any anomalies identified with the JE tool, process, or benchmarks. • Rate the provincial benchmarks and create a job hierarchy for the provincial benchmarks. • Gather data from all school districts and match existing job descriptions to the provincial benchmarks. • Identify the job hierarchy for local job descriptions for all school districts. • Compare the local job hierarchy to the benchmark-matched hierarchy. • Develop a methodology to convert points to pay bands - The confirmed method must be supported by current compensation best practices. • Identify training requirements to support implementation of the JE plan and develop training resources as required. Once the objectives outlined above are completed, the JE Committee will mutually determine whether a local, regional or provincial approach to the steps outlined above is appropriate. It is recognized that the work of the committee is technical, complicated, lengthy and onerous. To accomplish the objectives, the parties agree that existing JE funds can be accessed by the JE committee to engage consultant(s) to complete this work. It is further recognized that this process does not impact the established management right of employers to determine local job requirements and job descriptions nor does this process alter any existing collective agreement rights or established practices. When the JE plan is ready to be implemented, and if an amendment to an existing collective agreement is required, the JE Committee will work with the local School District and Local Union to make recommendations for implementation. Any recommendations will also be provided to the Provincial Labour Management Committee (PLMC). As mutually agreed by the provincial parties and the JE Committee, the disbursement of available JE funds shall be retroactive to January 2, 2020. The committee will utilize available funds to provide 50% of the wage differential for the position falling the furthest below the wage rate established by the provincial JE process and will continue this process until all JE fund monies at the time have been disbursed. The committee will follow compensation best practices to avoid problems such as inversion. The committee will report out to the provincial parties regularly during the term of the Framework Agreement. Should any concerns arise during the work of the committee they will be referred to the PLMC. Create a maintenance program to support ongoing implementation of the JE plan at a local, regional or provincial level. The maintenance program will include a process for addressing the wage rates of incumbents in positions which are impacted by implementation of the JE plan. The provincial parties confirm that $4,419,859 of ongoing annual funds will be used to implement the Job Evaluation Plan. Effective July 1, 2022, there will be a one-time pause of the annual $4,419,859 JE funding. This amount has been allocated to the local table bargaining money. The annual funding will recommence July 1, 2023.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Formal Evaluations The employer shall undertake formal evaluations of an employee’s performance of the various duties and responsibilities of a position only if one or more of the following conditions is present: • employee request • mutual agreement of hiring unit and employee • recommendation arising from informal evaluation • decision of Chair, Xxxx, Director or designate resulting from the processing of a complaint in accordance with Article 8.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!