The Negotiating Process Sample Clauses

The Negotiating Process. The negotiations were formally launched on 30th September 1998, in accordance with article 366(3) of Xxxx XX bis. During the negotiations the ACP showed strong solidarity, despite its internal differences. Four negotiating groups were established; the Central Group, in charge of Political and Institutional Matters and co-ordination; Group 2 Private Sector, Investment and other Development Strategies; Group 3 Economic and Trade Co- operation and Group 4 considering Financial Co-operation. Three Ministerial Negotiation Conferences were held in Brussels on 29-30 July 1999, 7-8 December 1999 and 2-3 February 2000. The fundamental principles of the EC-ACP partnership, such as equality between the parties, respect for sovereignty, ownership of the strategies by the countries concerned and differentiation, were relative uncontroversial issues. However other topics proved more contentious. Both parties agreed to intensify the political dialogue so as to cover all areas of concern for the parties. In this context the essential elements of the partnership had to be agreed. Human rights, democracy and the rule of law were accepted, but the EU insisted on the inclusion of good governance which the ACP rejected because of its links with the non- execution clause8; for the EU the violation of one of the fundamental principles could entail the suspension of assistance. For the ACP it was necessary to ensure that no unilateral measures were undertaken by the EU under this clause without a consultation procedure in which political dialogue would be respected and the principles and procedures for these consultations clearly defined. They also considered that democracy and the rule of law already constituted good governance and that therefore there was no need to add a fourth essential element. It was not until the 7-8 December 1999 Brussels Ministerial Conference that agreement was reached. In this session “good governance” was defined as the transparent and responsible management of public resources for the purposes of equitable and sustainable development (this is now Article 9(3) of the new agreement). Good governance will not be considered an “essential” element but a “fundamental” which does not trigger the non-execution clause in itself, only in “serious cases of active and passive corruption”. Thus two procedures were adopted, one for consultation and adoption of measures in case of a violation of one of the essential elements (human rights, democracy and rule of law...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
The Negotiating Process 

Related to The Negotiating Process

  • NEGOTIATING PROCEDURE The Board agrees to make available to the Association when available to the Board information concerning the financial resources of the District, including but not limited to: annual financial reports and audits; register of Certificated personnel; tentative budgetary requirements and allocations; agendas and minutes of Board meetings; census data; names and addresses of all certificated employees; and public information available to the Board that will assist the Association in developing intelligent, accurate, informed, and constructive programs on behalf of certificated employees and their students. The District and the Association agree to meet prior to the setting of the district budget for the ensuing year in order to provide the Association with an opportunity to provide input on budgeting priorities.

  • Benchmarking Process 2.2.1 The Supplier shall produce and send to the Authority for Approval, a draft plan for the Benchmark Review.

  • NEGOTIATING PROCEDURES 4.01 A request for professional negotiations shall be submitted in writing by the SHTA to the Board or its designated representative or by the Board’s designated representative to SHTA before April 1 of the year (approximately 90 calendar days) of the expiration of the existing Agreement. A copy of the notice shall be filed with the State Employment Relations Board. A mutually convenient meeting shall be held by April 15th in which both parties shall exchange negotiation packages which shall include additions to, deletions from or revisions of the existing agreement. No new items shall be introduced for negotiations during said negotiations except what may be mutually agreed upon by both negotiation teams.

  • Hiring Process i. School District and Teach For America will collaborate in good faith to facilitate the efficient hiring of individual Teachers, in accordance with the School District’s established District hiring practices.

  • Bidding Process 3.1. Bidding shall generally commence based on the sequence of the lot being shown on the PAH Website. However the Auctioneer has the right to vary the sequence without having to give prior notice to the intended bidders.

  • Bumping Procedure (1) Regular employees who receive notice of layoff shall have the right to bump employees with less seniority.

  • Joint Network Implementation and Grooming Process Upon request of either Party, the Parties shall jointly develop an implementation and grooming process (the “Joint Grooming Process” or “Joint Process”) which may define and detail, inter alia:

  • Working Procedure Assist in the definition and analysis of vehicle system requirements. Prepare technical specification sheets. Evaluate vendor proposals to ensure the specifications are met. Assist in the generation and checking of test reports. May conduct and witness factory acceptance tests, dynamic performance tests and may provide support for commissioning of vehicles at customers' premises. Perform other related duties as required.

  • Ordering Process 6.4.1 CLEC, or CLEC's agent, shall act as the single point of contact for its End User Customers' service needs, including without limitation, sales, service design, order taking, Provisioning, change orders, training, maintenance, trouble reports, repair, post-sale servicing, Billing, collection and inquiry. CLEC's End User Customers contacting Qwest in error will be instructed to contact CLEC; and Qwest's End User Customers contacting CLEC in error will be instructed to contact Qwest. In responding to calls, neither Party shall make disparaging remarks about each other. To the extent the correct provider can be determined, misdirected calls received by either Party will be referred to the proper provider of local Exchange Service; however, nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to prohibit Qwest or CLEC from discussing its products and services with CLEC's or Qwest's End User Customers who call the other Party seeking such information.

  • Testing Procedure A. For alcohol testing, the member shall be first given a breath test, at the collection site, followed by a confirmatory urine test only where the breath test reveals an initial positive alcohol level of .04 grams per 210 l. of breath. If the initial breath test results are below this level, testing shall be discontinued; if confirmatory urine tests results are below a level equivalent to .04 grams per 210 l. of breath, the confirmatory test shall be considered negative.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.