THE ADMISSION DECISION Sample Clauses

THE ADMISSION DECISION. PARTIES TO THE AGREEMENT This agreement is entered into between the doctoral candidate, hereafter referred to as “the candidate”, and the University of Stavanger, hereafter referred to as “UiS”, by the relevant faculty and department/centre:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
THE ADMISSION DECISION. This agreement is entered into between the doctoral candidate, hereafter referred to as “the candidate”, and the faculty and department/unit at the institution: _ (name) has on (date) been admitted to the PhD programme in at (institution and faculty) (unit)
Sample 1See All (4)
THE ADMISSION DECISION. This agreement is entered into between the doctoral candidate, hereafter referred to as “the candidate”, AHO and Institute at AHO: (Name of candidate) has on (date) been admitted to the PhD programme at The Oslo School of Architecture and Design at (Institute at AHO)
Sample 1
THE ADMISSION DECISION. This agreement is entered into between the doctoral candidate, hereafter referred to as “the candidate”, and The Consortium for the Joint Ph.d. Programme in Nautical Operations (UiT – The Arctic University of Norway, NTNU – The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, HSN – University College of Southeast Norway and HVL - Western Norway University of Applied Sciences): (name) has on (date) been admitted to the joint PhD programme in nautical operations at UiT, NTNU, HSN and HVL.
Sample 1
THE ADMISSION DECISION. This agreement is entered into between the PhD candidate, hereafter referred to as “the candidate”, and the Faculty: The candidate ___________________________________________________________________ (name) has on ________(date) been admitted to the PhD programme in_________________________________ at Molde University College, : ______________________________________________(faculty)
Sample 1
THE ADMISSION DECISION. The agreement is established between the PhD candidate and UiB, represented by the faculty and department or basic unit. Name of the PhD candidate: has been accepted to the PhD programme in Artistic Research at the Faculty of Fine Art, Music and Design, UIB Basic unit/department:
Sample 1
THE ADMISSION DECISION. This agreement is entered into between the doctoral candidate, hereafter referred to as “the candidate”, and the faculty and department/unit at the institution: (name) has on (date) been admitted to the PhD programme in artistic research in the arts at Oslo National Academy of the Arts (department)
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
THE ADMISSION DECISION. This agreement is entered into between the doctoral candidate, hereafter referred to as “the candidate”, and the faculty and department/unit at the institution: XXX/THE CANDIDATE has DATE xxx been admitted to the PhD programme in Sport Science at Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Department of XXX, (on the precondition that the comments in the expert assessment are taken into account).
Sample 1

Related to THE ADMISSION DECISION

  • The Decision If mediation fails, or is not appropriate, and if the decision can be rendered after a short deliberation, the Arbitrator will do so. By meeting first with counsel to explain the framework of the Arbitrator’s decision, the parties are provided with an opportunity to influence the exact terms of resolution. Within the framework of settlement as outlined by the Arbitrator, the parties can work out exact terms which best suit the specifics of the case. Such an opportunity should not be wasted by continuing to argue the merits of the case.

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this LGIA and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator(s) must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Interconnection Facilities, or Network Upgrades.

  • Written Decisions Decisions rendered at Level One which are unsatisfactory to the aggrieved person and all decisions rendered at Levels Two and Three of the grievance procedure shall be in writing setting forth the decision and the reasons therefore, and shall be transmitted promptly to all parties in interest and to the Association.

  • Arbitration Decision The arbitrator’s decision will be final and binding. The arbitrator shall issue a written arbitration decision revealing the essential findings and conclusions upon which the decision and/or award is based. A party’s right to appeal the decision is limited to grounds provided under applicable federal or state law.

  • COURT'S DECISION 33.01 In the event of any articles or portions of this Agreement being held improper or invalid by any Court of Law or Labour Relations Board, such decision shall not invalidate any other portions of this Agreement than those directly specified by such decision to be invalid, improper or otherwise unenforceable.

  • Hearing Decision The decision of the Board shall be in writing and shall contain findings of fact and the personnel action approved, if any. The findings may reiterate the language of the pleadings or simply refer to them. The decision of the Board shall be certified to the Superintendent or designee who recommended the personnel action, and he/she shall enforce and follow this decision. A copy of the decision shall be delivered to the appellant or his/her designated representative personally or by registered mail. The decision of the Board shall be final.

  • Hiring Decisions Contractor shall make the final determination of whether an Economically Disadvantaged Individual referred by the System is "qualified" for the position.

  • Final Decisions The Contracting Officer will issue a final decision as required by 33.211 if—

  • Review by the Association of Procurement Decisions The Procurement Plan shall set forth those contracts which shall be subject to the Association’s Prior Review. All other contracts shall be subject to Post Review by the Association.

  • Impartial Decisions The Design Professional is the interpreter of the conditions of the Construction Contract and the judge of its performance, in the first instance. The Design Professional shall side neither with the Owner nor with the Contractor, but shall use its powers to enforce performance by both.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.