Test Planning. For all supplied products, the supplier must create a test planning for incoming goods inspection, parts tests and component tests as well as the final test, and implement it during the process. All tests must be documented in the production control plan. The scope of the tests is defined by the drawing and / or SQP agreements. Particularly in the event of quality problems, the supplier must adjust his test planning accordingly. The standard IATF 16949 shall be used as a basis for that. In the event of incapable processes, a 100% test of the characteristics shall be conducted according to CPK-requirements.
Test Planning. Test planning will be accomplished in the manner prescribed by the lead OTA’s directives. The lead OTA invites supporting OTAs to participate in early activities (between acquisition entities, developmental testers and operational testers) which focus on developing strategies to leverage and integrate test efforts and use of data between developmental and operational testing (DT and OT). Examples would include the activities of integrated test teams (ITT), early involvement, test and evaluation Working-level Integrated Product Team (T&E WIPT), Integrated Product Team (IPT), and program test integration working groups, which produce a Test and Evaluation Strategy (TES) per XxXX 5000. (series). Supporting OTAs will participate early in MOT&E planning and remain proactive throughout the test planning process. Safety will be addressed throughout all phases of MOT&E test planning. The lead OTA will produce the OTA test plan with concurrence from the Supporting OTAs.
Test Planning. (i) Providing scheduled reports on progress made on projects in test, including identifying projects in trouble, and those that are on track;
Test Planning. The Contractor shall ensure all test documentation and activities are traceable to requirements, issues or incidents, including test plans, test cases, test data staging, test scenarios, and test scripts in accordance with established PDSS processes. The Contractor shall properly set up the test environment and required data to support testing. All test documentation is subject to Government approval prior to use in support of system changes, no matter the Contractor’s perceived magnitude of the change. The Contractor shall perform RCA (CDRL A001) and may be required to provide a short and long term testing plan. The Contractor shall plan and execute required test and evaluation processes to include data quality and performance tests as required. The Contractor shall provide test strategy, planning and execution schedule with external partners. The Contractor shall follow a repeatable test strategy for system changes. The Contractor shall identify and communicate test risks, resource requirements, supporting service needs, and scheduling milestones. When required, the Contractor shall prepare and deliver for Government approval, test documentation, including detailed Test Plans (CDRL C001), test cases (CDRL C002), and test scripts (CDRL C003) that are traceable to requirements, issues or incidents. As a part of CDRL C001, the Contractor shall identify required Government support such as Government furnished property, equipment, information, external partners, or data required to conduct testing activities necessary to carry out any tasks in this section. The Contractor shall provide proposed test scripts and technical justification for level of testing, to include: function unit test, regression, and failover. The Contractor is encouraged to utilize prescanned scripts to resolve known issues. The Contractor shall provide a roll- back plan for each system change. All test documentation shall be uploaded by the Contractor into the Government’s data repository. Deliverables CDRL A001 – Scientific and Technical Report - (RCA Report) CDRL C001 - Test Plan CDRL C002 - Software Test Description (STD) - (Test Case) CDRL C003 - Software Test Description (STD) - (Test Script)
Test Planning. Test planning shall stipulate: - - which feature needs be tested, - - how often, - - to what extent, - - by whom, - - with which test equipment, and - - how, - - how the results have to be documented. The results of the test planning shall be summarized in a Test Plan.
Test Planning. The Contractor shall be responsible for all test event planning activities. The Contractor shall develop a Test Plan that documents all resources needed to execute the test event, unless the requirement for a Test Plan document is waived by the COR on a case-by-case basis for each test event.. The test cases to be executed during the test event shall be documented in the Test Plan. For each release, the contractor shall test all new functionality as well as all fixes to software defects. Contractor shall plan for integration testing with external systems as well. The Contractor shall assess and plan for regression testing of previously delivered functionality to ensure no breakage. Contractor shall conduct a Risk Assessment of each software release to aid in building the Test Plan. Contractor shall participate in PMO Release design reviews and PMO sprint reviews in order to develop test cases. The contractor shall refine and decompose test planning requirements through participation in the following: • Preliminary Design Review (PDR) as required • Critical Design Review (CDR) as required • Daily Developer status briefings during Sprints • Bi-Weekly Status Update (SUM) Meetings • Weekly Engineering Review Group (WERG) Meetings • Weekly Test Management Meetings • Scrum Meetings as required • Weekly IPT Meetings • Daily CIT Briefings • Contractor Weekly Program Change Review Board (PCRB) Meetings The contractor Test Manager activities shall include the following: • Identify and verify availability of test team resources • Participate and collaborate with software development to include sprint briefings • Identify and verify availability of systems administrators • Identify and verify all Government-off-the-shelf (GOTS), and Commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) software requirements to support test events in all lab test beds • Identify all interfaces to be evaluated against all test beds • Perform independent development technical evaluations • Coordinate with the Government toward resolution of release production issues • Participate in the generation of any required Risk Assessments • Identify and report to the Government all projected test conflicts with recommended solutions • Ensure all test build, software and test execution documentation is collected and stored in a Government- specified repository • Coordinate projected release test activities between all test sites and stakeholders • Identify test entrance and exit criteria • Assist with release schedule ...
Test Planning. Since intentional disconnection of consumers is not allowed, the fault localization algorithm performance in real environment will only be possible to assess, after an actual event in MV network. However, estimating the time of the loop (from detecting a fault to reporting fault location) to be completed could be tested with tweaking of fault detection criterion. KPI-09: Quality of the LV grid operation in island mode KPI_09: Quality of the LV grid operation in island mode Responsible Partner: EyPESA Units: Duration [hours] Reason for island mode interruption Waveform quality Definition General background As indicated in WP1, one of the objectives of this project is to demonstrate the possibility to operate the LV grid in island mode. This type of operation is possible thanks to the energy capacity provided by the batteries in the PED. The island mode could be initiated for self-healing purposes, in case for example of a fault occurred in a point upstream the secondary substation, to reconnect the clients that have undergone the interruption. Moreover, in the future, the island mode could become a type of normal operation, within the context of energy communities and local markets, for which the independency from the main grid could be initiated for economic/environmental reasons. Specific definition in the project validation In the phase of project validation, the island mode will be tested and monitored. The quality of the island mode operation, will be evaluated according to three sub-indicators: - Its duration: the island could last during the entire planned period, indicated by the Island Power Management Application (IPMA) or it could end beforehand, due to an unplanned event; - The reason for its interruption: the best-case scenario consists in ending the island as planned, but the interruption could also occur due to a short-circuit, because of unexpected depletion of the energy in the batteries or for other reasons. - The quality of the waveform, making sure it respects the standards defined in EN-50160 (see CI-03) Related use case The use case related to this KPI is HLUC 06: Power management in intentional controlled- island mode Methodology General description of the methodology The three sub-indicators will be analyzed as follows: - Duration: simple measurement of the time elapsing between the beginning and the end of the island. - Reason for its interruption: analysis and continuous monitoring of the state of the island to identify the cause o...
Test Planning. The supplier shall plan the necessary process-accompanying interim- and final tests, whereby CWAT reserves the right to issue special test instructions. The proof of function and reliability according to defined development flow shall be carried out in case of new developments.
Test Planning. (IATF 16949: Chapter 8.5.1) The inspection plan is created on the basis of the production control plan. The inspection plan shows all the characteristics to be inspected with the associated inspection equipment and the inspection frequency for each operation. For special features (#1 and #2), machine and process capability studies (cmk and cpk) are to be scheduled and documented. The planning shall also take into account the identification of training for employees and, if applicable, the set-up of workstations with regard to statistical process control (SPC, control chart technology).
Test Planning. Test planning for MOT&E will be accomplished in the manner prescribed by Lead OTA directives. The below listed general procedures, however, will be followed:
