Tenure Review. 20.6.1 The Tenure Review Committee shall convene after the conference of the 4th year fall evaluation, regardless of rating, and shall make its recommendation by January 31 using the standard district form.
Tenure Review. All contract faculty members employed in a position designated by the District as “tenure track,” and governed by the provisions of California Education Code §87604 through §87609 shall be evaluated during the first years of their employment according to the policies, criteria, and procedures enumerated in this Article.
Tenure Review. A. Intent
Tenure Review. All unit members employed in a position designated by the District as “tenure track,” and governed by the provision of California Education Code §87604 through §87609 shall be evaluated during the first years of their employment according to the policies, criteria, and procedures enumerated in this Article. Tenure track faculty hired on or after the 2018-2019 academic year, will follow the 2018-2021 contract tenure review process. Tenure track faculty hired during the 2016-2017 or 2017-2018 academic year, will follow the respective contract tenure review process.
Tenure Review. A. Intent - The master contract applies with the understanding that anyone who may want to come into SCCC to perform any type of review is subject to passing an NCIC background check.
Tenure Review. As with all other evaluations scheduled for Spring 2021, evaluation ratings will be based solely on subject matter content.
Tenure Review. Timeline Specific timelines in any particular year shall be determined by the offices of Academic Affairs and Student Services. August Tenure Review Committee is formed and chair is elected by week two of the semester. September Faculty member individually meets with each Tenure Review Committee member and their Xxxx to discuss goals of the Tenure Review process, including mutual decisions about individual observation dates. Observation window opens in week four. November Observation window closes in week thirteen. December Each Tenure Review Committee member and the Xxxx will meet separately with the faculty member to discuss their observation and the faculty member’s goals for the following year. All student evaluations and observation reports are submitted to the Tenure Review Committee Chair and the Xxxx. Self-evaluation is due to the Tenure Review Committee Chair and the Xxxx by the last instructional day of the semester. January The Tenure Review Committee meets with the Xxxx to discuss all the materials submitted. The Tenure Review Committee offers feedback. A summative report is prepared by the Committee Chair and submitted to the faculty member by the last business day before instruction begins. A separate summary report is prepared by the Xxxx and submitted to the faculty member by the last business day before instruction begins. The faculty member has until the Friday of the first week of instruction to submit a response to both reports, if desired. The summative reports and all supporting documentation are forwarded to the appropriate Vice President by the same date. The Vice President submits the tenure review report to the President in time for a first consideration at the February Board Meeting.
Tenure Review. The parties hereto agree that tenure review shall take place by the end of the Faculty Member's sixth year of full-time teaching service at the University. If a Faculty Member receives an unqualified appointment to his seventh year of full-time teaching service (i.e., he does not receive a termination notice), he shall be considered tenured.
Tenure Review. The Chair may initiate a comprehensive review of a tenured faculty member if fifty percent or more of the faculty peers‟ in his discipline report a less than Satisfactory evaluation in both research and service in two consecutive years. (In disciplines with less than three members, the evaluations of the department must also indicate fifty percent Unsatisfactory ratings in the categories in question.) In such cases, the Chair shall meet with the faculty member to discuss the implications and consequences of the faculty member‟s Unsatisfactory rating(s). If the Chair decides to initiate a comprehensive review, the following procedures will be adhered to:
Tenure Review. If a teaching deficit has been identified during the annual review process of a tenured faculty member by a majority of the department faculty members, the Chair must initiate the post-tenure review process. If a deficit has been identified through two consecutive years of the annual review process in the areas of research or service, the Chair must initiate the post-tenure review process. The Xxxx may independently initiate the post- tenure review process, if the faculty member's evaluations indicate a serious performance deficit.
