Tentative Ruling. Xxxxxx opposed explaining that he will file motion to modify or suspend plan payments, which has not been filed yet. APPEARANCE REQUIRED unless Trustee stipulates to continue. Party Information Debtor(s): Xxxxxxx X Xxxxxx Xx. Represented By Xxxxx Xxxxxx Joint Debtor(s): Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Represented By Xxxxx Xxxxxx Trustee(s): Xxxxxxxxx (SV) X Xxxxx (TR) Pro Se 11:00 AM 1:17-12102 Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Chapter 13 #113.00 Motion to Dismiss Case for Failure to Make Plan Payments Docket 62 Tentative Ruling: Xxxxxx opposed asserting that he will be current by the hearing date. Debtor explains that he paid $2,000 and $1,000 in October 2019. Did Trustee receive the payments? APPEARANCE REQUIRED unless Trustee stipulates to continue. Party Information Debtor(s): Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Represented By Xxxxxxx Xxx Xxxxxx Trustee(s): Xxxxxxxxx (SV) X Xxxxx (TR) Pro Se 11:00 AM 1:17-12246 Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx and Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Chapter 13 #114.00 Trustee's Motion to Dismiss Case for Failure to Submit All Tax Refunds fr. 10/22/19 Docket 79 Tentative Ruling: APPEARANCE REQUIRED. Party Information Debtor(s): Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Represented By Xxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxx Joint Debtor(s): Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Represented By Xxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxx Trustee(s): Xxxxxxxxx (SV) X Xxxxx (TR) Pro Se 11:00 AM 1:17-13139 Xxxxxxx Del Mundo Laya Chapter 13 #115.00 Trustee's Motion for Order Modifying the Plan to Increase the Plan Payment fr. 10/22/19 Docket 31 Tentative Ruling: Cont’d. fr. 10-22-19 All parties agreed to continue at the last hearing. APPEARANCE REQUIRED unless Trustee stipulates to continue.
Tentative Ruling. For the foregoing reasons, the Court is inclined to DENY the motion to dismiss and the motion for default judgment, and CONTINUE the hearing on the motion for summary 2:00 PM CONT...
Tentative Ruling. The tentative ruling of the Court is to deny the motion without prejudice because the movant did not serve the debtor pursuant to LBR 4001-1(c)(1)(C)(i). Party Information Debtor(s): Xxxxx Road Production Campus, Represented By Xxxxxx X Xxxx Movant(s): Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxx Represented By Xxxxx X Xxxx Trustee(s): Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx (TR) Represented By Xxxxxxx X Xxxxxxxx 1:30 PM 6:11-40323 Xxxx Xxxxxxx Chapter 13 Adv#: 6:20-01184 Xxxxxxx x. OneWest Bank FSB, successor in interest to Indymac #14.00 Status conference re: Complaint to avoid junior lien of Onewest Bank FSB [Property: 00000 Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx, XX 00000] FROM: 2-11-21 Docket 1 Tentative Ruling: - NONE LISTED - Party Information Debtor(s): Xxxx Xxxxxxx Represented By Xxxxxx X Xxxxxxxx Defendant(s): OneWest Bank FSB, successor in Pro Se Plaintiff(s): Xxxx Xxxxxxx Represented By Xxxxxx X Xxxxxxxx Trustee(s): Xxx (MJ) Xxxxxxxxx (TR) Represented By Xxx (MJ) Xxxxxxxxx (TR) 1:30 PM 6:11-40323 Xxxx Xxxxxxx Chapter 13 Adv#: 6:20-01184 Xxxxxxx x. OneWest Bank FSB, successor in interest to Indymac #15.00 Hrg re motion for default judgment FROM: 1-28-21 Docket 6 Tentative Ruling: - NONE LISTED - Party Information Debtor(s): Xxxx Xxxxxxx Represented By Xxxxxx X Xxxxxxxx Defendant(s): OneWest Bank FSB, successor in Pro Se Plaintiff(s): Xxxx Xxxxxxx Represented By Xxxxxx X Xxxxxxxx Trustee(s): Xxx (MJ) Xxxxxxxxx (TR) Represented By Xxx (MJ) Xxxxxxxxx (TR) 1:30 PM 6:20-13919 Xxxxxx Xxx Xxxxxxx Chapter 7 Adv#: 6:20-01155 Xxxxxxxx et xx x. Xxxxxxx #16.00 Hrg re order to show cause regarding why this adversary proceeding should not be dismissed FROM: 1-14-21 Docket 0 Tentative Ruling: - NONE LISTED - Party Information Debtor(s): Xxxxxx Xxx Xxxxxxx Represented By Xxxxxx X Xxx Defendant(s): Xxxxxx Xxx Xxxxxxx Pro Se Plaintiff(s): Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Represented By Xxxx X Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Pro Se Trustee(s): Xxxx X Xxxxxxxx (TR) Represented By Xxxxxxx X Xxxxxxxx Tinho Xxxx Xxxxxx Xxxx & Xxxxxxx LLP 1:30 PM 6:20-13919 Xxxxxx Xxx Xxxxxxx Chapter 7 Adv#: 6:20-01155 Xxxxxxxx et xx x. Xxxxxxx #17.00 Status conference re: Complaint to determine dischargeability of debt FROM: S/C 12-3-20, 1-14-21 Docket 1 Tentative Ruling: Party Information - NONE LISTED - Debtor(s): Xxxxxx Xxx Xxxxxxx Represented By Xxxxxx X Xxx Defendant(s): Xxxxxx Xxx Xxxxxxx Pro Se Plaintiff(s): Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Represented By Xxxx X Xxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Represented By Xxxx X Xxx Trustee(s): Xxxx X Xxxxxxxx (TR) Represented By Xxxxxxx X Xxxxxxxx Tinho Mang 1:...
Tentative Ruling. This matter was continued to allow for the parties to file an updated reaffirmation. On 3/8/21, a reaffirmation agreement was filed by creditor Kinecta C.U., purporting to treat the same debt obligation, ECF doc. 16. The newly filed reaffirmation agreement is set for hearing on April 20, 2021, at 8:30 a.m. This matter appears to be moot, given the filing of doc. 16. APPEARANCES WAIVED on 3/16/21 2-16-21 TENTATIVE BELOW This hearing was continued from Dec. 15, 2020, and again from Jan. 19, 2021, to allow Debtor the opportunity research whether the reaffirmed loans for the 2014 Ford Explorer & the 2012 Ford Escape were cross-collateralized with this "overdraft" line of credit, and whether the agreement could be amended to include a provision providing for Kinecta to report timely payments to credit reporting bureaus. If Xxxxxx chooses not to appear, the reaffirmation may be denied but Xxxxxx was informed by volunteer counsel and the Court that he was free to voluntarily make payments on this overdraft line of credit to maintain his good standing with Kinecta. APPEARANCE REQUIRED or reaffirmation to be denied. 12/15/20 TENTATIVE BELOW Petition date: 8/17/2020 Was Reaffirmation Agreement filed w/in 60 days of the conclusion of the 1st 341(a) meeting as required by LR 4008-1? Yes Discharge?: No Property: "LINE OF CREDIT" Debtor’s valuation of property (Sch. B): not listed on Sch. B Amount to be reaffirmed: $5,000.00 (balance due -$2,608.62) Reaffirmation Agreem't, Part I, 8:30 AM CONT...
Tentative Ruling. The hearing today will occur by video only using Zoom. The pertinent hearing link is below: Meeting URL: xxxxx://xxxx.xxxxxxx.xxx/j/1607298772 Meeting ID: 160 729 8772 Party Information Password: 348479 Debtor(s): Xxxxxx Xxx Xxxxxxx Represented By Xxxxxx W Ask Defendant(s): Xxxxxx Xxx Xxxxxxx Represented By Xxxxxx W Ask Plaintiff(s): Xxxx X. Xxxxxxxx Represented By Tinho Mang Trustee(s): Xxxx X Xxxxxxxx (TR) Represented By Xxxxxxx X Xxxxxxxx Tinho Xxxx
Tentative Ruling. Based on the foregoing, the Court is inclined to DENY the Motion, finding bad faith on the part of the Debtors in connection with the bankruptcy filing. 11:00 AM CONT... Xxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxx and Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Chapter 7 APPEARANCES REQUIRED. Party Information Debtor(s): Xxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxx Represented By Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxx X Xxxxxx Joint Debtor(s): Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Represented By Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxx X Xxxxxx Movant(s): Xxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxx Represented By Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxx X Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Represented By Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxx X Xxxxxx Trustee(s): Xxxxxx X Xxxxxxxxx (TR) Represented By Xxxxx X Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxx 2:00 PM 6:14-22067 Xxxx X. Xxxx Chapter 7 Adv#: 6:21-01018 Xxxx x. Xxxxxx et al #4.00 CONT. Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment [Holding Date] From: 4/20/21,6/8/21,1/18/22, 4/6/22 EH [Case transferred from Judge Xxxx Xxxxxxx on 2/24/22] [Tele. appr. Xxxx Xxxx, pro se Plaintiff] Docket 6 Tentative Ruling: 5/4/2022
Tentative Ruling. The motion is DENIED. For actions upon breach of contract the Plaintiff is given the choice of where to file his or her action, choosing between the defendant’s residence, the place of performance, or the place where the contract was entered into. C.C.P. § 395. By any reasonable interpretation the place of performance of a contract for home care is the location of the patient receiving the services. Thus, Plaintiff’s selection is justified. Provisions in contracts which attempt to select venue are void. General Acceptance Corp. of California x. Xxxxxxxx (1929) 207 Cal. 285. To the extent that Defendant intends this motion to be for change of venue based upon forum non convens the request is, in any event, denied. There is no evidence that any party would be less convenience in Contra Costa County. ADD-ONS
Tentative Ruling. This matter was continued from 3/16/21 so that the Reaffirmation Agreement filed on 3/8/21, ECF doc. 16, purporting to treat the same debt obligation,
Tentative Ruling. Party Information - NONE LISTED - Debtor(s): Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Represented By Xxxxx Xxxxxx Joint Debtor(s): Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Represented By Xxxxx Xxxxxx Movant(s): Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Represented By Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Represented By Xxxxx Xxxxxx Trustee(s): Xxx Xxxxxxxxx (TR) Pro Se 10:00 AM 6:17-18733 Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Chapter 7 #11.00 Motion for relief from stay U.S. BANK VS DEBTOR Property: 0000 Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, XX 00000 [Real Prop] Xxxxx Xxx, attorney/movant Docket 89 Tentative Ruling: 11/7/2019: None.
Tentative Ruling. T’ee. states that Debtor is in material default and has a $15,526.76 remaining balance. No opposition filed. APPEARANCE REQUIRED unless Trustee stipulates to continue. Party Information Debtor(s): Xxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Represented By Xxxx Xxxxxxx Trustee(s): Xxxxxxxxx (SV) X Xxxxx (TR) Pro Se 11:00 AM
