Technical Studies. Additional technical studies may be required to establish baseline conditions within the project area, and to facilitate impact analysis. The need and scope of these analyses would be developed after completion of the schematic design. Possible technical analysis that may be required includes the following:
Technical Studies. Upon the Effective Date, Subparagraph 4(C) of the Lease shall be amended to add the following: “Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the RFI Study or Engineering Study obtained prior to constructing any material changes to the Wireless Telecommunication Facility determines that there is a potential for interference that cannot be reasonably remedied or that such changes will prejudice the Water Tower, Landlord shall not have the right to terminate the Agreement, and instead Tenant shall modify its proposed changes to avoid interference and/or prejudice to the Water Tower, at which point a new RFI Study or Engineering Study shall be obtained by the Tenant.”
Technical Studies. The following outline of technical studies is based on our experience with other bridge projects and our understanding of the proposed project. The CONSULTANT environmental team will prepare both the draft and final environmental documents in compliance with CEQA and NEPA procedures per the Caltrans SER, and Caltrans District 3 and FHWA guidelines. Additional technical studies including Water Quality Assessment Report, Air Quality Conformity Analysis and Community Impact Analysis as well as incorporate additional testing will be reviewed, analyzed and/or prepared as required by Caltrans. The CONSULTANT environmental team will prepare and distribute copies of the technical studies for up to three review cycles and will respond to comments and update the studies as needed for approval.
Technical Studies. It is assumed that ground disturbing activities are required and therefore the following technical studies are anticipated. However, the need for technical studies will be confirmed as part of the PEAR that is prepared. All technical studies will be consistent with meeting the requirements of CEQA and NEPA, as well as those of related environmental statutes and regulations. The technical studies will be prepared to cover both related statutory documentation requirements and to support preparation of a joint NEPA/CEQA document required for project approval.
Technical Studies. Provide professional Consulting Services as required to prepare, submit and obtain the Approval from the Development Services Director of necessary engineering technical studies (traffic analysis, water, water conservation and sewer studies, basin and storm drain sizing, grading, backbone infrastructure mapping, water quality, title review, and encumbrance) to complete the Environmental Document
Technical Studies. As discussed in Task 5, this scope assumes the use of submitted technical studies to support the environmental analysis. All studies will be peer reviewed under Tasks 2 and 5, above. Depending on the results of the peer review findings of the technical studies and after County and Contractor review, it is assumed that any deficiencies in the studies will be provided by the technical consultants (authors of the technical studies identified on Attachment A-1. After revision and approval by the County and Contractor, the technical reports will be revised, and the draft technical studies will then be incorporated into the Administrative Draft EIR. This scope of work assumes that the technical studies will be included as appendices to the EIR to allow for sufficient public review and input. (Also, see optional studies identified and proposed scopes of work for this effort in Attachment A-2)
Technical Studies. This task includes preparation of the traffic study by Xxxxxx Transportation Consulting; review of the geology and soils study prepared by the applicant by GeoSoils; and the review of the hydrology and drainage study provided by the applicant and preparation of a utility study by KPFF Consulting Engineers. The approach for the preparation or review of these studies is described below.
Technical Studies. This category includes projects for the collection of pertinent data, analysis of issues and needs, evaluation of alternative solutions, public input, and recommended actions, to assist in making solid waste management decisions at the local or regional level. Projects under this category may also include research and investigations to determine the location, boundaries, and contents of closed municipal solid waste landfills and sites, and to assess possible risks to human health or the environment associated with those landfills and sites. Funding limitations applicable to this category include: • All technical studies funded under this program must be consistent with H-GAC’s regional solid waste management plan, and prepared in accordance with guidelines provided by the TCEQ.
Technical Studies. We would request that any background studies be provided at the start of the CEQA process. We would review these and avoid duplication of effort while providing objective, third-party review. While we have not yet seen these studies, we assume that they will address many of the impact criteria to be evaluated in the IS/MND. We would like to request a geotechnical study as soon as possible.
Technical Studies. Traffic Study Completed-September 3, 1996 Hydrology Study Completed-February 7, 1997 Geo-Technical Study Completed-October 18, 1996 Environmental Impact Study Not required ZONING AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION AND APPROVALS Clark County Departmxxx xf Comprehensive Planning Zone Charge Application Completed-August 14, 1996 Condition Use Permit Approved, Conditional Approval- January 17, 1997 Code Variance Application Completed-February 7, 1997 Vacation of Public Right of Way Approved, Conditional Approval- January 17, 1997 FAA-DOA PERMIT APPLICATIONS AND APPROVALS FAA Notice of Proposed Construction Completed-December 9, 1997 or Alteration Approved, Conditional Approval-February 7, 1997 Clark County Departmxxx xf Aviation Completed-February 8, 1997 McCarren Airport (Dixxxxxxx Permit) Approved, Conditional Approval-February 18, 1997 NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (Rights of Way, Dedications, Easements) Applications and Approvals Abandonment of State Right of Way Submitted-January 23, 1997 Approved, Conditional Approval- January 17, 1997 Recorded-May 21, 1996 SCHEDULE 4.14 SAGC - PERMITS (Continued) PUBLIC WORKS Off-Site Improvements Agreement Agreement-Dated February 21, 1997 Improvement Plans Submitted-September 21, 1996 HTE #96-271-27136 Approved-Pending Review by Clark County Building Department LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Application for Water Plan Review Accepted for review-February 10, 1997 SCHEDULE 4.15 SAGC - LITIGATION In 1995, Giant Ride, Inc. filed suit in the District Court of Clark County, Nevada, xxxinst SAGC claiming that SAGC has breached a contract to purchase a giant slide for Saint Andrews' Las Vegas SxxxxXxxk. Giant Ride, Inc. is seeking an unspecified amount of damages. SAGC denies that it had a contract to purchase such a slide. SCHEDULE 4.17 SAGC - TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES LVDG owns 66.7% of SAGC's outstanding common stock. Vaso Boreta, SAGC's Xxxxxxxx xx the Board, is an Officer, Director and principal shareholder of LVDG. Ronald S. Boreta, Prxxxxxxx xxx x Xxrector of SAGC, is a Director and principal shareholder of LVDG. Robert S. Rosburg anx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Direxxxxx xx XXXX, are also Directors of LVDG. In addition, John Boreta, the son xx Xxxx Xxreta and the xxxxxxx xx Ronald S. Boreta, is x xxxxxxxxx xxxreholder of LVDG. SAGC has extensive transactions with LVDG, LVDG's other subsidiaries, and Voss Boreta's Las Vexxx sxxxx. SAGC occupies approximately 2,360 square feet of office space and 2,857 square feet of ...
