Taxonomy. 16. Ownership (5%or more)
Taxonomy. Onvia and AOL will mutually agree upon an initial product category taxonomy, using taxonomy in existence on the Standard Site as of the Effective Date as an initial starting point, within 30 days of the Effective Date, and shall cooperate to update such taxonomy on a regular and consistent basis, as mutually agreed. Third parties will map from such third parties' proprietary taxonomy to Onvia taxonomy prior to being integrated into the AOL Buying Directory. Onvia will extend taxonomy to incorporate additional items and product types not in current taxonomy within a reasonable time frame. Data Exchange: Third parties which AOL wishes to have integrated into the AOL Buying Directory shall (it being acknowledged and agreed that this is outside the control of AOL) meet XML (eXtensible Markup Language), or any other mutually agreed standard data exchange standards published by Onvia (and the Parties shall so mutually agree on at least one standard prior to the completion of the AOL Buying Directory); provided that, in the event they do not meet such standards, Onvia shall use commercially reasonable efforts to integrate them based on other reasonable and applicable standards. Third parties also shall (it being acknowledged and agreed that this is outside the control of AOL) maintain appropriate XML (or other applicable) data quality standards as established through generally applicable standard policy by Onvia; provided that, in the event they do not meet such standards, Onvia shall use commercially reasonable efforts to work with such party based on other reasonable and applicable standards. Third Parties will retain QA responsibility for all data transferred for use in the AOL Buying Directory. Any additional items and product types will require expanded data to be provided to Onvia by third parties in formats to be defined based on requirements. Any data transmissions by third parties to Onvia should be delivered via FTP and, if mutually agreed, shall meet currently available compression and encryption standards; provided that, in each case, in the event they do not meet such standards (FTP, or compression and encryption), Onvia shall use commercially reasonable efforts to work with such party based on other reasonable and applicable standards.
Taxonomy. The bottlenose dolphin is a single representative of the genus Tursiops and one of two Delphinidae species in the Black Sea (Table 1). For the first time it was recorded in this basin under the name Delphinus tursio by Xxxxxx (1837). Fifty-five years later, Xxxxxxxxx (1892) has confirmed its presence and attributed it to the species Tursiops tursio Fabricius. Then, within taxonomic revision of Black Sea cetacean fauna conducted by Xxxxxxxxx-Xxxxxxxxx (1940), local bottlenose dolphin was designated as the subspecies Tursiops truncatus ponticus. The author compared his own research data (1,450 individuals and 19 skulls were measured) with few publications on the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin and, as a result, has adduced four morphological peculiarities as diagnostic markers of the Black Sea subspecies:
Taxonomy. Order Procellariiformes Family Diomedeidae Genus Phoebastria Species albatrus The type specimen for this species was collected by Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx offshore of Kamchatka, Russia in the Bering Sea during the 1740's and was described by X.X. Xxxxxx as Diomedea albatrus in 1769 [1]. Following the results of genetic studies [2], the family Diomedeidae was arranged into four genera. The genus Phoebastria, North Pacific albatrosses, now includes the short-tailed albatross (Figure 1), the Laysan albatross (P. immutabilis), the black-footed albatross (P. nigripes), and the waved albatross (P. irrorata) [1]. Recent analyses, based on complete nucleotide sequencing of mitochondrial cytochrome b gene, confirm this arrangement [3].
Taxonomy. Additional analysis comparing shell morphology, anatomy, and genetic relationship of known populations of Page springsnails and congenerics is needed. This information could help estimate how much of the Page springsnail’s total genetic diversity is due to genetic variability within populations, versus how much is due to variability among populations. Benefit: Researching baseline biological and ecological data is essential for evaluation and documentation of trend, determining appropriate management actions, and refining management strategies. Measure of Success: Research questions (A, B, C above) will be investigated and reported on in annual reports, and/or technical reports and the results will be included in future management strategies.
Taxonomy. Few or no and/or inconsistently variety of levels of activities are questions asked. reflect a variety of Xxxxx’x Taxonomy. consistently of high levels of Xxxxx’x quality fostering Taxonomy. students’ self-directed reflections. Standards Teacher demonstrates Teacher inconsistently Teacher consistently Teacher demonstrates 3-10 little or no evidence of demonstrates evidence demonstrates evidence a variety of
Taxonomy. Although the Sicklefin Redhorse is only recently known to science; this species was an important food resource for Native American tribes inhabiting the Southeast region of the United States. Xxxxxx (2006) elicited from native speakers of the Cherokee language that they recognized pictures of the Sicklefin Redhorse as a species called “junigihtla.” which translates in English as “wearing a red feather.” This name is a fitting description of the red, falcate dorsal fin of this species. Modern fish biologists were slow to recognize the distinct morphological features of this species despite encountering it for several decades before its recognition as distinct from other co-occurring redhorse species. The Sicklefin Redhorse was collected in 1937 (based upon preserved specimens collected at the then unimpounded mouth of Xxxxxx Creek near its confluence with the Tuckasegee River), but this and subsequent collections were misidentified until 1992, when Dr. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx obtained and examined two specimens collected by Xx. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx in 1981 and 1982 from the Little Tennessee River and recognized they were a distinct species (Xxxxxxx 1999, p. 4). Based on the characteristics of specimens’ lower lips, dorsal fins, and pharyngeal teeth, Xxxxxxx (1999, pp. 3-4, 9, and 13) recognized the species as possibly a previously unidentified species or a hybrid of the Smallmouth Redhorse (M. breviceps) and the River Redhorse (M. carinatum). Subsequent detailed morphological and behavioral studies (Xxxxxxx 1999, pp. 3-6 and 8-25, Tables 1-3, and Figures 1-12) and genetic studies (Xxxxxx et al. 2002, pp. 1433-1452) have concluded that the Sicklefin Redhorse is, in fact, a distinct species. The USFWS has reviewed the available taxonomic literature and is not aware of any challenges to the validity of this determination regarding the Sicklefin Redhorse.
Taxonomy. Order Family Genus and Species Scientific Synonyms Common names (English, French and Spanish)
Taxonomy. The Amur xxxxxxxx (Acipenser schrenckii) is one of 27 species of xxxxxxxx in the family Acipenseridae (Xxxxxx et al. 2019, not paginated). The synonyms Acipenser schrenki and Acipenser schrenkii are sometimes used, but are now considered invalid (Xxxxxx et al. 2019, not paginated; ITIS 2019, not paginated). We are not aware of any taxonomic disputes regarding the validity of the Amur xxxxxxxx as a species. Thus, we determined that the Amur xxxxxxxx is a valid species for listing under the Act. Physical Description Amur xxxxxxxx are large fish reaching up to 3 meters (m) (10 feet) in length and 190 kilograms (420 pounds) in weight (Zhuang et al. 2002, p. 659). They have a downward-facing mouth, cartilaginous skeleton, and a series of bony plates in rows along their back (Billard and Lecointre 2001, p. 363). Tactile barbels hang from the mouth (Billard and Lecointre 2001, p. 359). A rare xxxxx morph of Amur xxxxxxxx grows more slowly than the more common xxxx morph (Zhuang et al. 2002, p. 660). The presence of two color morphs (Zhuang et al. 2002, p. 660; Krykhtin and Svirskii 1997, p. 236) indicates some level of ecological or genetic diversity in the Amur xxxxxxxx. Range Amur xxxxxxxx live in the Amur River basin along the far eastern border between China and Russia. The species’ range includes the main river, its tributaries, and the Amur Estuary. The species was historically found as far west as Nerschinsk, Russia, in the upper Shilka River (Georgi 1775 cited in Vaisman and Fomenko, p. 4) and in all major tributaries of the Amur. Amur xxxxxxxx are rare in areas of the estuary with salinity over 7.5 parts per thousand (ppt) (Koshelev et al. 2014a, p. 1314). The species occurs at low densities in the southern (and possibly northern) Sea of Okhotsk. Very rarely, Amur xxxxxxxx are found in the Sea of Japan (Koshelev et al. 2014a, p. 1313). The species may also be present in very small numbers in Lake Khanka in extreme southeast Russia (Ruban and Qiwei 2010, not paginated), although few authors confirm this. Life History Amur xxxxxxxx are slow to mature; males require 7 to 12 years, and females 9 to 14 years, before reproducing (Novomodny et al. 2004, p. 19; Zhuang et al. 2002, p. 659). This long time to maturity can slow the species’ recovery from disturbance, relative to that of species with shorter generation times. On reaching maturity, fish are between 1.1 and 1.3m (43 to 51 in) long and weigh 6 to 19 kg (13 to 42 pounds; Zhuang et al. 2002, p. 660). Ind...
Taxonomy. The taxonomy has been completely reviewed from the previous French version. The first level of general themes has been adapted to match with Build UP ones and to allow qualified information transfers. The second level has been simplified (especially building types and building systems). The taxonomy will be used both for contents and for users’ qualification, opening the opportunity to connect people between them, to send them relevant content via the future newsletters or to publish adequate contents directly on the website. (Cf. Deliverable D2.3)
