Task Order CPARS Sample Clauses

Task Order CPARS. The OASIS SB CO does not administer or evaluate task order performance. It is the sole responsibility of Federal customer agencies to evaluate each task order exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold under OASIS SB using the process and criteria in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) or alternative past performance assessment reporting system. OCOs and customer agencies must use CPARS for task orders awarded under OASIS SB unless otherwise mandated by the customer agency to utilize past performance systems other than CPARS. At a minimum, the OCO will be responsible for evaluating final Contractor performance upon task order completion. Interim performance evaluations may be conducted as prescribed by the customer agency’s procedures on any task order with a period of performance exceeding one year. Evaluations of Contractor performance will be provided to the Contractor as soon as practicable after completion of the evaluation. Contractors will be given a minimum of 30 days to submit comments, rebutting statements, or additional information. Copies of the evaluations, Contractor responses, and review comments, if any, will be retained as part of the task order file, and may be used by Federal agencies to support future award decisions.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Task Order CPARS. The OASIS CO does not administer or evaluate task order performance. It is the sole responsibility of Federal customer agencies to evaluate each task order exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold under OASIS using the process and criteria in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) or alternative past performance assessment reporting system. OCOs and customer agencies must use CPARS for task orders awarded under OASIS unless otherwise mandated by the customer agency to utilize past performance systems other than CPARS. At a minimum, the OCO will be responsible for evaluating final Contractor performance upon task order completion. Interim performance evaluations may be conducted as prescribed by the customer agency’s procedures on any task order with a period of performance exceeding one year. Evaluations of Contractor performance will be accomplished in accordance with FAR 42.1503. Copies of the evaluations, Contractor responses, and review comments, if any, will be retained as part of the task order file, and may be used by Federal agencies to support future award decisions.
Task Order CPARS. The HCaTS CO does not administer or evaluate task order performance. It is the sole responsibility of OCOs to evaluate each task order exceeding the micro-purchase threshold under HCaTS using the process and criteria in CPARS or an alternative past performance assessment reporting system. OCOs shall use CPARS for task orders awarded under HCaTS unless otherwise mandated by their Federal agency to utilize past performance systems other than CPARS. At a minimum, the OCO shall be responsible for evaluating final Contractor performance upon task order completion. Interim performance evaluations may be conducted as prescribed by the Federal agency’s procedures on any task order with a period of performance exceeding one year. Evaluations of Contractor performance will be provided to the Contractor as soon as practicable after completion of the evaluation. Contractors will be given a minimum of 30 days to submit comments, rebutting statements, or additional information. Copies of the evaluations, Contractor responses, and review comments, if any, will be retained as part of the task order file, and may be used by Federal agencies to support future award decisions.

Related to Task Order CPARS

  • Task Order X19.5 The Contractor submits a Task Order programme to the Service Manager within 2 days of receiving the Task Order Z The additional conditions of contract are Z1 to Z11 always apply. Z1 Cession delegation and assignment

  • Task Orders This non-exclusive Agreement does not guarantee that the City will utilize CONSULTANT in any capacity or for any services identified herein. When the City identifies a need for the CONSULTANT’s services, the City will request a proposal from the CONSULTANT to provide the services requested. The CONSULTANT’s proposal shall be submitted in the format of the sample task order, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit “A” and shall be based on the CONSULTANT’s currently hourly fee set forth in the CONSULTANT’s proposal and attached hereto as Exhibit “B”. If a sub-consultant(s) is to be utilized for services under a task order, the CONSULTANT shall obtain a written proposal from the sub-consultant(s) and attach the same with to the CONSULTANT's proposal submitted to the City. Upon receipt of the CONSULTANT’s proposal, the City shall decide in its sole discretion whether to award the task order to the CONSULTANT. Depending on the lump sum, not to exceed amount of each proposed task order, the task order may be awarded by the City Manager (if within her purchasing authority of $50,000 or less) or the City Commission. If the task order is awarded to the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT shall commence the identified services upon receipt of a Notice to Proceed from the City or upon the CONSULTANT's receipt of a fully executed task order for the services. The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals submitted by the CONSULTANT.

  • Contract Task Order A-E shall be assigned work via a task order by COUNTY which shall subsequently be referred to as the “Contract Task Order” (hereinafter “CTO”). A CTO for each project shall be developed by A-E in conjunction with COUNTY Project Management staff. The COUNTY Project Manager shall manage all A-E’s work including monitoring the CTO work schedule, quality of deliverables, review of invoiced amounts, adherence to set budget, and internal review of submittal packages. A-E shall follow all requirements as outlined in the CTO; this general Scope of Work, the project specific Scope Statement, and the Architect-Engineer Guide (Rev July 2018). The CTO shall include a detailed Scope Statement, describing tasks to be performed with a specific list of deliverables for each task, schedule of work and cost to complete the work. The schedule of work shall allow enough time for meetings with COUNTY Management staff to review the work progress, provide technical and policy direction, resolve problems and ensure adherence to the work completion schedule. The CTO shall include a cover sheet provided by COUNTY Project Management staff with the appropriate signature blocks and contract information. Once both Parties agree, and all Parties have signed the CTO, COUNTY Management staff shall provide A-E with a Notice to Proceed (NTP) to begin work. A-E shall submit all plans, reports and other documents produced under the CTO to the assigned COUNTY Project Manager within the timeframe indicated in the CTO or as directed by COUNTY Project Management staff.

  • Work Orders If the Contract is for indefinite quantities of Services, as specified in the Signature Document, all Work will be performed in accordance with properly executed Work Orders.

  • Statement of Work The Contractor shall provide the services and staff, and otherwise do all things necessary for or incidental to the performance of work, as set forth below:

  • TASK ORDER PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE ‌ The period of performance for each Order placed under the Master Contract shall be specified in the individual Order. All the following conditions apply:

  • Task Order Clauses) All costs associated with the preparation, presentation, and discussion of the Contractor’s proposal in response to a task order solicitation will be at the Contractor’s sole and exclusive expense and each task order will be funded by the ordering agency at the task order level.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.