Task 2. The contractor shall develop and implement a cohesive, coordinated and sustainable STEM education outreach strategies across CCDC-ARL that facilitates in attracting eligible applicants. The contractor shall market and promote the CCDC ARL Outreach program to attract qualified prospective applicants via contractor developed website. The outreach effort shall include the design and distribution of advertising and application materials and an appropriate method to reach audiences from which qualified applicants will be drawn. The outreach effort shall be wide ranging, national in scope and comparable to other nationally renowned undergraduate and graduate level science and engineering student programs. The contractor shall identify relevant media for communicating the program. The contractor shall submit marketing strategy to the Contracting Officer Representative (COR) for approval. The strategy should include marketing to diversified S&T community (HBCU/MIs, Tier I-III US institutions, & professional organizations/conferences). Marketing techniques/ approaches to consider:
Task 2. Conducting the Environmental Review To support the environmental review process and preparation of the Environmental Review Record (ERR), our team will compile all relevant environmental documentation into digital (.PDF) format for submittal to FBCCDD for review. Depending on the nature and complexity of the project, documentation may include: ✓ Preliminary site reviews ✓ Tiered reviews (if applicable) ✓ Agency consultation requests/response to agency comments ✓ Public involvement documentation (public notice, public meeting/public hearing information, response to comments, etc.) ✓ Alternatives analysis (8-step process for floodplain and/or wetlands development) ✓ Technical reports for “special studies” including biological assessments, wetland delineation reports, archeological background studies and/or surveys, Phase I/II ESAs, etc. Once MPACT determines whether the proposed activity will be housing or infrastructure, we will assign the review to the appropriate team staff to begin the ERR coordination process. The MPACT team can use HEROS or TIGR to compile the ERR (MPACT ask that Fort Bend County request access for MPACT Environmental Program Staff from the appropriate oversight agency), which will summarize the environmental documentation prepared for the proposed project in HUD’s required format. If necessary, we will participate in comment resolutions workshops with FBCCDD to address comments/revisions to the ERR and supporting environmental technical reports, exhibits, and worksheets.
Task 2. Acceptance Acceptance takes place on a quarterly basis, bound to the quarterly report and SLA. Acceptance is documented by an Acceptance Sheet signed by EASO. Acceptance of corrective maintenance deliverables under this task is based on: Accepted project documents (i.e., of any document updated as part of the activities under the contract); Completed and defect free functionalities and developments; Successful deployment at the DG-DIGIT Data Centre, in all required environments; Passed stress testing; Passed vulnerability testing; Passed user acceptance (functional) testing; Reports and minutes are accepted; Quality indicator target is met. Acceptance of technical support deliverables under this task is based on: The system is fully operational for the complete application scope and available on all required Commission environments. The system operates bug free, meaning that all known bugs are registered, prioritized and their fix is planned in subsequent system releases.
Task 2. Systems for maintaining unique and secure identities for specimens, subjects and biobanks Task 2 will be to explore systems for maintaining unique and secure identities (object models) for specimens, subjects and biobanks, as well as for keeping track of the handling of permissions for use, analytical results and statistical output. Meta-information on quality of specimens and phenotypes will be integrated. (GA BBMRI, no.: 212111) Primary related deliverables: D5.2, D5.5, Data Protection Deliverable Task 2 can be split into two parts; the part for which it was originally intended, primarily exploration of systems for Globally Unique Identifiers (GUIDs), and the part for which an additional deliverable was created, the issue of data protection and privacy. For the latter part work is still ongoing in collaboration with WP6 and the final conclusions will be accounted for elsewhere. Deliverable 5.2, dedicated to the first part of Task 2, does not contain a final decision for a particular existing system for Globally Unique IDentifiers (GUIDs). Instead, it outlines the scenarios of what should be made a preceding decision, the one of suitable service architectures for BBMRI in the short and long-term perspective. The service architecture scenarios are connected to the use cases and system design and therefore presented under Task 3 in Section 1.3.4. Additionally, D5.2 contains an inventory of the most important relevant existing GUIDs systems, presented below.
Task 2. Systems for maintaining unique and secure identities for specimens, subjects and biobanks ▪ Use cases 1 and 2 in Section 1.1.2 do not require globally unique identifiers issued and to be maintained by an external authority. Hence, surrogate identifiers, which should not contain any semantics, should be used. Exclusion of the semantic information from identifiers makes them more stable. It is important that identifiers can be created and managed locally in a coordinated fashion (Section 1.2.1). ▪ If need for a system for globally unique identifies should arise, ISO/HL7 OIDs will be a good choice as they are existing in the health care domain already. Mapping to the surrogates is possible by maintaining 1:1 mapping to surrogate keys, which are managed locally (Section 1.2.1). ▪ A final decision on a GUID standard for biological information should be made jointly with other affected ESFRI (Section 1.2.1). ▪ Researcher identification and user identification in general is another important issue. Emerging standards like Open Researcher and Contributor ID – ORCID (xxxx://xxx.xxxxx.xxx/) should be used. ▪ Standard federated authorization and authentication protocols like SAML2 or OpenID must be used (R9). ▪ Work on the Data Protection deliverable is ongoing jointly with WP6.
Task 2. 4: Interactive and semiautomatic performance evaluation tools (Month 4-36) Task leader: Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx, CYFRONET (CO1) Task 2.4 will develop on-line tools that allow application developers to measure, evaluate, and visualise the performance of Grid applications with respect to data transfer, synchronisation and I/O delay as well as CPU, network and storage utilisation. The tools will support any level of granularity, from the Grid level down to the process level. Acquisition of raw performance data will be based on the monitoring infrastructure developed in WP3. The performance evaluation tools will exhibit four distinctive and novel features:
Task 2. Complete an online health assessment before the end of the Healthy Living Requirement (HLR) Qualification Period. Non-compliance by an employee, enrolled on a DTE Local 223 medical plan with the above Healthy Living Requirements, will result in the employee being charged a Healthy Living Requirements (HLR) Surcharge (according to the HLR Surcharge Schedule chart listed below) that will be assessed during the Healthy Living Requirements (HLR) Surcharge Period listed below. Non-compliance by an employee’s spouse, enrolled on the employee’s DTE Local 223 medical plan with the above Healthy Living Requirements, will result in the employee being charged a Healthy Living Requirements (HLR) Surcharge (according to the HLR Surcharge Schedule chart listed below) that will be assessed during the Healthy Living Requirements (HLR) Surcharge Period listed below.
Task 2. Develop the specification and design for online and offline response tools. The Authority will build and manage the tool according to the specification. The consultation will be published on the Xxx.xx website. A link can be provided to a response form from within the consultation document and from the consultation webpage. Response tool should be designed to both ease responses and to facilitate the logging and analysis of responses. A downloadable/printable version of the responses tool should be available to cater for those not wishing to use the online tool. NB: an online response tool will reduce the number of and format variations of email responses. We still expect to receive a number of longer, detailed responses in report format from key stakeholders. The supplier will need to work with the Authority to develop the tools as the Authority develops the content of its consultation. The Authority will own this tool, it will be built and managed internally by the Authority.
Task 2. A Low Carbon Growth Study for Slovakia The Bank will prepare a low carbon growth study which will integrate and synthesize the analysis of the baseline and policy scenarios under the macroeconomic and energy models developed under Task1 and provide recommendations for policymakers. To this effect, the study will summarize the results from the modeling work in Task 1 above, the data used, as well as the outcomes of any sensitivity analysis. It will examine macroeconomic and fiscal effects, and sectoral implications, in particular for the energy sector and energy-intensive industries, and will include specific analysis of an economic path to 2030, in line with the 2030 EU Framework for Climate and Energy Policies. It will also consider paths to 2050, including the EU Roadmap 2050 and EU recommendations on a circular economy. Deliverables for Task 2:
Task 2. Provide funding for a Paralegal for the Office’s Family Court Division to handle the administrative, clerical, and case-related management issues that the attorneys are currently handling because of insufficient non-attorney support. This position will allow Family Court Division attorneys to spend more time on case litigation, investigation, and client communication.
