Table S4. Analysis of a reconstructed genome (das_tool.- binsanity.asm_contigs_metaspades_gt1500-bin_18.fa or Nitrospirae_ANNOTATED_contigs_1000.genes.fna) with metabolic potential for oxygen reduction, sulfate reduction and nitrate reduction to nitrous oxide or ammonium. This organism was enriched and became the dominant microbial member in the bioreactor, representing a new group in the Nitrospirae phylum. Proteins of interest are highlighted in this table. NODE: contig number; length: contig length; cov: contig coverage; last underscore followed by digit: gene number.
Table S4. 1: Land Acquisition and Affected Households by Subproject Province Non- significant12 Significant Total Total Affected Permanent Land Aacqusition Temporary Land Acquisition Trees NWFP Affected households (AHHs) AHHs AHHs APs Residential Structures (ha) (ha) Daral Khwar 21 0 21 218 0 5.78 0.1 460 Machai 7 0 7 77 0 0 0.2 12 Ranolia 22 2 24 274 2 6 0.15 5 Total NWFP 50 2 52 569 2 11.78 0.45 477 PUNJAB Chianwaii 3 0 3 21 0 0 0.6 3 Pakpattan 4 0 4 28 0 0 0.2 4 Xxxxx 0 0 0 00 0 0 0.0 0 Total PUNJAB 11 0 11 77 0 0 3.2 7 Total Project 61 2 63 646 2 11.78 3.65 484 7. The Resettlement Framework (RF) was formulated to guide the preparation of RPs of subprojects, under future tranches, that may have resettlement impacts. The RF identifies the broad scope of the Investment Program and outlines the policy, procedures and institutional requirements that will be followed in preparing RPs. The EAs of the Investment Program will be the Provincial governments; and the IAs for the first tranche will be Sarhad Hydel Development Organization (SHYDO) in NWFP, and the Irrigation and Power Department (IPD) in Punjab. For the subsequent tranches the EAs will be the provincial governments where the subprojects will be implemented. IAs are yet to be identified. The Project Management Units (PMUs) will be responsible for formulating RPs for subprojects with resettlement impacts, as outlined in RF. The draft RPs will be submitted to ADB for review and approval prior to contract award, and compensation will be paid to all APs before the commencement of civil works of any subproject.
Table S4. Fit statistics from the biometric moderation MCoTS models of child emotional and behavioural outcomes moderated by paternal SES indices 181 Table S5. Moderated path estimates, standard errors and 95% confidence intervals of child emotional and behavioural outcomes moderated by paternal SES indices 182 Figure S1. Path diagram of the full Multiple-Children-of-Twins-and-Siblings (MCoTS) structural equation model. 183 Figure S2. Xxxxxxx (2002) bivariate moderation model. 184 Figure S3. Distributions of child emotional and behavioural outcome variables before and after logarithmic transformation 185 Table of Figures Chapter 2:
Table S4. Measurement Summary of 2-Facet RSM (Integrated Data, Single Scorer) Facet N Measure M(SD) Measure Range Infit Range Outfit Range Sep. Strata Rel. Persons 318 0.09 (1.57) -4.90 – 4.16 0.36 – 2.48 0.40 – 8.17 6.91 0.98 Items 30 0.00 (0.99) -2.36 – 1.46 0.70 – 2.03 0.66 – 4.23 17.14 1.00 Note. Rating scale thresholds: 0/1 = -1.06 logits, 1/2 = -0.59 logits, 2/3 = 0.38 logits, 3/4 = 1.27 logits. Table S5. Linear regression EIT item averages on select linguistic features following Xxx et al. (2016) Estimate SE ß p Intercept 3.87 0.40 Syllables -0.07 0.04 -0.35 0.10 Relative Clauses -0.27 0.20 -0.21 0.18 Vocabulary Score -0.09 0.05 -0.34 0.08 F(3,26) = 9.55, p = 0.0002, Multiple R2 = 0.54, Adjusted R2 = 0.47.
Table S4. Cumulative risk (95% Confidence Interval) using segregation analysis, major gene models assuming relative risk as a continuous, piecewise linear function of age. Main Analysis Cumulative risk The BRCA1 c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln (R1699Q); intermediate risk variant (95% Confidence Interval) Sub-Analysis 1 Cumulative risk (95% Confidence Interval) Sub-Analysis 2 Cumulative risk (95% Confidence Interval) Age Breast cancer Ovarian cancer Breast cancer Ovarian cancer Breast cancer Ovarian cancer 25 0.03 0.15 0.03 0.06 0.04 0.56 (0.01, 0.06) (0.02, 1.57) (0.01, 0.08) (3.94x10-4, 7.50) (0.01, 0.10) (0.003, 3.73) 30 0.21 0.27 0.22 0.10 0.28 0.96 (0.10, 0.45) (0.03, 2.79) (0.08, 0.57) (7.01x10-4, 12.98) (0.08, 0.73) (0.005, 6.56) 35 0.82 0.42 0.86 0.16 1.09 1.44 (0.38, 1.75) (0.04, 4.34) (0.32, 2.21) (1.10x10-3, 19.63) (0.31, 2.81) (0.008, 10.11) 40 2.22 0.64 2.32 0.24 2.95 2.08 (1.04, 4.70) (0.06, 6.49) (0.87, 5.92) (1.66x10-3, 28.11) (0.85, 7.49) (0.01, 14.87) 45 4.89 0.96 5.10 0.36 6.41 2.98 (2.30, 10.19) (0.10, 9.66) (1.94, 12.72) (2.52x10-3, 39.32) (1.89, 15.95) (0.02, 21.63) 50 8.22 1.51 8.72 0.67 10.62 4.13 (4.22, 16.40) (0.30, 13.68) (3.86, 20.34) (0.12, 51.16) (3.69, 24.88 ) (0.13, 29.53) 55 11.99 2.30 13.05 1.29 15.25 5.39 (6.82, 22.50) (0.66, 17.66) (6.73, 28.18) (0.36, 60.48) (6.06, 32.87) (0.34, 36.61) 60 15.02 3.39 16.82 2.37 18.87 6.65 (9.35, 26.46) (1.21, 20.74) (9.53, 33.35) (0.80, 66.01) (8.15, 37.55) (0.66, 41.30) 65 17.46 4.83 20.28 4.10 21.64 7.80 (11.37, 28.80) (1.99, 21.94) (12.18, 36.99) (1.51, 66.40) (9.93, 40.72) (1.14, 41.82) 70 20.01 6.43 23.89 6.02 24.47 9.07 (13.26, 32.01) (2.78, 24.53) (14.51, 42.42) (2.25, 66.73) (11.29, 46.03) (1.58, 42.50)
Table S4. The layout of OTU number, anammox sequen- ces, accession numbers and the related anammox strain in the tree (0.03 cutoff).
