Sustainable Health Review Sample Clauses

Sustainable Health Review. The Sustainable Health Review has identified eight Enduring Strategies and 30 Recommendations to progress the sustainability agenda. HSPs are required to support implementation of the eight Enduring Strategies and 30 Recommendations, which should be based on detailed planning and assessment of prioritisation, sequencing, key partners, new and existing work, emerging evidence and issues, and development of specific measures to track progress and outcomes.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (16)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Sustainable Health Review. The Sustainable Health Review (SHR) is an ambitious reform program that focuses the WA health system on prevention, brings care closer to home and delivers equity in health outcomes. The aim is for Western Australians to receive excellent healthcare now and in future generations. Working together will deliver the structural changes and cultural shifts that are needed to create a sustainable healthcare system. HSP Chief Executives, Department of Health Assistant Directors General, and the Mental Health Commissioner have been appointed as Executive Sponsors for implementation of specific SHR Recommendations by the Department CEO as the Program Owner, and collectively form the Program Steering Committee responsible for the Program’s progress and strategic decisions. The Program Steering Committee, through the Department CEO, reports to the Ministers for Health and Mental Health on the Program. The Cabinet-appointed Independent Oversight Committee provides impartial advice to the Program’s Executive Sponsors and a public quarterly report to the Ministers for Health and Mental Health. Following release of the SHR Final Report in April 2019, the WA health system commenced developing a Sustainable Health Review Implementation Program (the SHR Program). The SHR Program has completed mobilisation with all 30 Recommendations comprising planning, progressing delivery and reporting. HSPs are required to support delivery of SHR Recommendations in partnership with key stakeholders, contributing to planning, governance, implementation, communications and reporting on progress with clear measures to track progress and outcomes. ICT and Digital investment is a core enabler of the delivery of modern healthcare services. In recognition of this, a critical enabler of the vision set out in the SHR is the WA Health Digital Strategy 2020-2030 and supporting roadmap, the government endorsed strategic document that guides investment and prioritisation decisions around ICT/Digital for the WA health system.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (10)
Sustainable Health Review. The Sustainable Health Review (SHR) is the Government’s blueprint for sustainable reform and transformation of the WA health system over the next decade. The SHR identifies eight Enduring Strategies and 30 Recommendations to drive a cultural shift from a predominantly reactive, acute, hospital-based system to one with a strong focus on prevention, equity, early child health, end of life care, and seamless access to services at home and in the community through use of technology and innovation. Following the release of the SHR Final Report in April 2019, the WA health system commenced building a Sustainable Health Implementation Program (the Program) while progressing SHR priorities, with many early activities aligned to the WA COVID-19 Recovery Plan. HSP Chief Executives, Department of Health Assistant Directors General, and the Mental Health Commissioner are appointed as Executive Sponsors for implementation of specific SHR Recommendations by the Director General as the Program Owner, and collectively form the Program Steering Committee responsible for the Program’s progress and strategic decisions. The Program Steering Committee, through the Director General, reports to the Ministers for Health and Mental Health on the Program. The Cabinet-appointed Independent Oversight Committee provides impartial advice to the Program’s Executive Sponsors and a public quarterly report to the Ministers for Health and Mental Health. HSPs are required to support scoping and delivery of SHR Recommendations in partnership with key stakeholders, contributing to planning, governance, implementation, communications and reporting on progress with clear measures to track progress and outcomes.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (9)
Sustainable Health Review. The Sustainable Health Review (SHR) is an ambitious reform program that focuses the WA health system on prevention, brings care closer to home and delivers equity in health outcomes. The aim is for Western Australians to receive excellent healthcare now and in future generations. Working together will deliver the structural changes and cultural shifts that are needed to create a sustainable healthcare system. The State Government is committed to the implementation of the SHR. WA Health continues to implement all the Strategies and Recommendations of SHR which remains the blueprint for building an enduring health system. Delivery of all SHR Recommendations will continue with a focus on select tranches. This will enable the system to intensify efforts on achieving SHR outcomes and build momentum. Over the next one to two years there will be a focus on six SHR Recommendations (Focus Recommendations) addressing timely access to outpatient services, models of care for people with complex conditions who are frequent presenters, funding approaches to support models of care and joint commissioning, 10-year digitisation, culture and innovation and workforce improvements. Aboriginal cultural governance, Aboriginal health outcomes, mental health outcomes, health equity across diverse and vulnerable population groups, preventative healthcare and partnership approaches will be emphasised and embedded within all Focus Recommendations. HSP Chief Executives, Department of Health Assistant Directors General, and the Mental Health Commissioner have been appointed as Executive Sponsors for implementation of SHR Recommendations by the Department CEO as the Program Owner. An updated SHR governance approach tailored to support refocused SHR Program delivery includes the Health Executive Committee, revised executive sponsorship and project support. HSPs are required to support delivery of SHR Recommendations in partnership with key stakeholders, contributing to planning, governance, implementation, and communications, with a streamlined and agile approach to reporting and monitoring against progress and outcomes.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (8)
Sustainable Health Review. The Sustainable Health Review has identified eight Enduring Strategies and 30 Recommendations to progress the sustainability agenda. HSPs are required to support implementation of the eight Enduring Strategies and 30 Recommendations, which should be based on detailed planning and assessment of prioritisation, sequencing, key partners, new and existing work, emerging evidence and issues, and development of specific measures to track progress and outcomes. Notional LHN—Commonwealth and State contributions to the National Health Funding Pool National Efficient Price (as per IHPA) Total Expected NWAUs Total Contribution Commonwealth State Contribution Funding Rate Contribution ABF Service group (NEP $) (#) (NEP $) (NEP $) (%) (NEP $) Acute Admitted 5,320 3,121 16,603,720 7,026,947 42.3 9,576,773 Admitted Mental Health 5,320 — — — — — Sub-Acute 5,320 1,297 6,900,040 2,920,202 42.3 3,979,838 Emergency Department 5,320 — — — — — Non Admitted 5,320 15,842 84,279,440 35,668,340 42.3 48,611,100 Total ABF 5,320 20,260 107,783,200 45,615,488 42.3 62,167,712 Non-ABF Service group ($) ($) (%) ($)
Sample 1

Related to Sustainable Health Review

  • Quality Assurance Program An employee shall be entitled to leave of absence without loss of earnings from her or his regularly scheduled working hours for the purpose of writing examinations required by the College of Nurses of Ontario arising out of the Quality Assurance Program.

  • COUNTY’S QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN The County or its agent will evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this Contract on not less than an annual basis. Such evaluation will include assessing the Contractor’s compliance with all Contract terms and conditions and performance standards. Contractor deficiencies which the County determines are severe or continuing and that may place performance of the Contract in jeopardy if not corrected will be reported to the Board of Supervisors. The report will include improvement/corrective action measures taken by the County and the Contractor. If improvement does not occur consistent with the corrective action measures, the County may terminate this Contract or impose other penalties as specified in this Contract.

  • Departmental Review If informal resolution of the problem through conciliation and negotiation cannot be effected, an aggrieved person may file a formal complaint with the departmental affirmative action coordinator or other designated official. Such a complaint must be filed on a form provided for this purpose and within five working days after the attempted resolution of the problem by the equal employment opportunity counselor or within twenty-five (25) working days after the date of the alleged discriminatory action, whichever shall first occur. The affirmative action coordinator will decide whether the complaint falls within the jurisdiction of the procedure and accept or reject it. Upon acceptance of the complaint, the affirmative action coordinator shall obtain the notes on the case from the equal employment opportunity counselor; may conduct a prompt, impartial investigation if he deems it necessary; shall explore the possibility of resolving the problem through negotiation or conciliation; shall present findings and recommendations on resolving the complaint to the agency/department head; and within forty-five (45) working days from the date the formal complaint was filed, shall present his written decision, as approved by the agency/department head, to the complainant, with a copy of the complaint and decision to be forwarded to the director of personnel.

  • Quality Assurance Plan The contractor shall develop and submit to NMFS a contractor Quality Assurance Plan, as referenced in Section F.5.3, which details how the contractor will ensure effectiveness and efficiency of collection efforts as well as the quality of data collected by its At-Sea Monitors. The contractor shall further establish, implement, and maintain a Quality Assurance Management program to ensure consistent quality of all work products and services performed under this contract.

  • Statewide HUB Program Statewide Procurement Division Note: In order for State agencies and institutions of higher education (universities) to be credited for utilizing this business as a HUB, they must award payment under the Certificate/VID Number identified above. Agencies, universities and prime contractors are encouraged to verify the company’s HUB certification prior to issuing a notice of award by accessing the Internet (xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xx.xx/tpasscmblsearch/index.jsp) or by contacting the HUB Program at 000-000-0000 or toll-free in Texas at 0-000-000-0000.

  • Product Safety Seller must maintain the state of the product so that it is able to perform to its designed or intended purpose without causing unacceptable risk of harm to a person or damage to property.

  • Department Review If a mutually acceptable solution has not been reached during Step 1, and the employee intends to pursue the grievance formally, the employee shall submit the grievance in writing on the Employee Grievance Resolution Form to the Department Head with a copy to the Labor Relations Division not later than ten (10) working days after the supervisor’s written response. The Department Head shall consider the grievance and render a written decision within ten (10) working days of receipt of the formal grievance. The written decision shall include a clear and concise statement including the reason(s) for the decision. The Department Head may hold a meeting with the employee to achieve any of the following purposes: 1) to identify why the employee feels there is a grievance and facilitate communication and resolution; 2) to clearly identify issues and areas of agreement/disagreement; and 3) to have the parties present whatever available information/ documentation necessary to fully attempt to resolve the grievance. The employee may be accompanied by his/her shop xxxxxxx during the Department Review, provided that the xxxxxxx is in the same department as the employee, and has been identified by the employee on the Employee Grievance Resolution Form. If the department, in consultation with the Labor Relations Division, determines that the grievance is outside of the Department Head’s authority, or the grievance involves employees working in separate departments, then such grievance shall be submitted to Step 3.

  • Synchronisation Commissioning and Commercial Operation 8.1 The Developer shall provide at least forty (40) days advanced preliminary written notice and at least twenty (20) days advanced final written notice to ESCOM of the date on which it intends to synchronize the Power Project to the Grid System.

  • HEALTH PROGRAM 3701 Health examinations required by the Employer shall be provided by the Employer and shall be at the expense of the Employer. 3702 Time off without loss of regular pay shall be allowed at a time determined by the Employer for such medical examinations and laboratory tests, provided that these are performed on the Employer’s premises, or at a facility designated by the Employer. 3703 With the approval of the Employer, a nurse may choose to be examined by a physician of her/his own choice, at her/his own expense, as long as the Employer receives a statement as to the fitness of the nurse from the physician. 3704 Time off for medical and dental examinations and/or treatments may be granted and such time off, including necessary travel time, shall be chargeable against accumulated income protection benefits.

  • Synchronization, Commissioning and Commercial Operation 4.1.1 The Power Producer shall give at least thirty (30) days written notice to the SLDC and GUVNL, of the date on which it intends to synchronize the Power Project to the Grid System.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.