Supplier Evaluation. Seller shall establish and maintain quality requirements that must be met by suppliers, contractors, to ensure that all purchased products and services conform to specified requirements. Seller shall monitor the performance of suppliers supplying materials for use in Products. To the extent Seller subcontracts any manufacturing, Seller shall ensure that such subcontractor(s) are bound by the Agreement.
Supplier Evaluation. The supplier undertakes to achieve the following objectives together with GGB. OTD: 96 - 100% Number of products delivered on time (5 working days before and 0 working days after the confirmed date) UMKZ: 0 - 1 Violation Environmental performance indicator (a gradation by one level if no UM certification is available) and packaging violations QKZ: x ≤ 250 Quality score (a gradation by one level if no EN9100 certification is available) and the number of products complained about. SKZ: 0 Incidents Special status notifications from the customer regarding quality or delivery issues, field failures, production downtimes, malfunctions at the customer's site, including return deliveries from the field. These key figures are evaluated by GGB every six months and transmitted to the supplier by means of the supplier evaluation.
Supplier Evaluation. KOH-I-XXXX XXXXX s.r.o. performs a supplier evaluation once a year. Following indicators are taken into account:
Supplier Evaluation. Diametrics shall manufacture the Portal Measurement Products with material purchased directly by Diametrics. A list of suppliers and contacts have been provided by Philips to Diametrics. Philips agrees to provide initially the "Supplier Evaluation". Diametrics' and Philips' engineering contacts (listed on Schedule 5) will jointly agree as to which supplied components of the Portal Measurement Module are required to be periodically audited by the Diametrics quality personnel.
Supplier Evaluation. The supplier evaluation is carried out through the questionnaire 018-004/21 PQ, to be filled up by the supplier and delivered to Siemens. Siemens reserves the right to perform quality audits based on the questionnaire and/or the supplier Quality Assurance Plan.
Supplier Evaluation. By the 20th day of the month following the calendar quarter, XX. XXXXXXXXX shall perform the SUPPLIER rating (supplier code/ABC rating). Rated and assessed are, among other things, the following XX. XXXXXXXXX criteria: SUPPLIER’s QM system; quality performance o quality number for the delivery of defect-free products; o fulfilment of the ppm agreements; delivery performance (quantity, deadline); Delivery reliability (including special shipments) Special status information from the customer as regards quality or delivery. SUPPLIERS rated B or C shall send a detailed activity plan to XX. XXXXXXXXX. In case the SUPPLIER does not react sufficiently or he does not react at all, B suppliers shall be rated as C suppliers. C suppliers shall be excluded from the bidding process.
Supplier Evaluation. BOMATEC shall perform supplier evaluations to monitor and assure the delivery quality. This includes quality, delivery performance, support and other aspects; it is communicated to the suppliers on an annual basis and upon request.
Supplier Evaluation. Suppliers will be subject to evaluation according to the supplier evaluation system. First evaluation of suppliers not listed on the Approved Supplier List will be made prior to final nomination. Approved suppliers will be subject to re-evaluation on a yearly basis. First evaluation will be made on the basis of the following criteria:
Supplier Evaluation. The global performance of Supplier will be evaluated annually for commercial, quality, logistics and technology elements and serves to determine Stoneridge’s strategic supply base. Based on the results of such evaluation, Supplier shall define and implement appropriate corrective actions. If the quality results fail to meet the committed goals, Supplier shall implement immediate corrective actions to reach the targets.
Supplier Evaluation. The Supplier shall be evaluated based on its performance. The evaluation process must be constantly mon- itored and is based on the latest version of Buyer procedure concerning Supplier evaluation available in the download area on the SumiRiko AVS homepage. If deficiencies can be determined during the evaluation, the Supplier is obligated to draw up and implement action plans with concrete goals, e.g. agreed ppm val- ues. The obligation to perform a self-evaluation remains unaffected hereby. Additionally to the monthly and consolidated half-yearly quality- and logistics performance evaluation, Buyer is using other criteria to classify and select its Suppliers (technology & facility, project management, cost level/competitiveness, innovation, support, know how/technical expertise,…) and reserves the right to re- quest current financial statements from the Supplier as well as product liability- and recall insurance related information (copies of valid policies) on a regular basis. The Supplier evaluation and classification shall be used as deciding factors for future business.
