Summary of the Study Sample Clauses

Summary of the Study. [Drafting note: The 250 word (max) “Study Summary” from Application Form to be included]
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Summary of the Study. This section provides a summary of the study, the main goal of which is to determine parental perspectives of school-aged children with DS towards inclusive education. The qualitative research adopted case study and phenomenology designs to address three research questions: (1) What are the attitudes of parents of school-aged children with Down syndrome towards the inclusion of their children in mainstream schools in Petropavlovsk? (2) What factors influence parental attitudes towards inclusive education? (3) How do parents advocate for the rights of the children with Down syndrome to be included in mainstream schools in Petropavlovsk? The study has shown that parents of school-aged children who have the diagnosis of DS and live in Petropavlovsk have a positive attitude towards inclusive education; nevertheless, the majority of respondents do not regard the mainstream school as a good setting for their children with special needs. Although many parents indicated the benefits that regular schools may provide, they hold a negative attitude towards the inclusion of their children with DS in a mainstream setting. The findings of this study suggest that a child's problems with health, a negative attitude towards children with DS, PMPC, a challenging curriculum, lack of teaching assistants and underqualified teachers in mainstream schools are the main barriers on the way to inclusive education. The results of this research support the idea that such factors as parental level of education, socio-economic status, personal experience, and expertise in the area of inclusive education have a significant impact on the perspectives, opinions, and behavior of parents. Another significant finding to emerge from this study is that the birth of a child with DS influences the families in different ways. Parental life can be associated with the 'battlefield' where mothers have to fight for the rights of their children with special needs.
Summary of the Study. [Drafting note: The 250 word (max) “Study Summary” from Application Form to be included] Study Participants and/or approved subcontractors for Major Subcontract Work [Drafting note: Recipient to complete. Clearly outline the role of each on the Study Participant and approved subcontractors for Major Subcontract Work.] Organisation Role Description of role in the Study [Consultant] [Study [Recipient] has engaged Consultant XXX to assist in delivering Participant/ the Study report. approved subcontractor for Major Subcontract Work] Outputs The Recipient will deliver the following outputs from the Study:
Summary of the Study. The purpose of this study was to understand teachers’ perceptions of primary and secondary trauma based on their emotional, professional, and relational impacts. It also aimed to examine what forms of trauma educators encounter within their school sites. The design used in this study was a mixed methods study. Data was collected using an online survey comprised of multiple-choice, Likert-scale, and open-ended questions. The research sample focused on teachers who are currently in the classroom and are supporting students who have experienced trauma. The study examined the following research questions:
Summary of the Study. The aim of the study was to explore the way the Dutch Green Deals and WRAP agreements, in particular the CPGD and the CC function. The data was collected through theme interviews with eight experts working in Dutch and UK govern- ments, WRAP and the founding organizations of the CPGD. The research find- ings revealed how these VEAs function and how their efficiency is measured. This was achieved through in-depth exploration of the three main categories: de- velopment, implementation and performance and added value. The aim of this section is to highlight the key research findings in relation to the main research questions of the study. According to the research findings the Green Deals and WRAP agree- ments were initiated to tackle environmental issues through public-private co- operation. The Dutch Green Deals are voluntary agreements between the Dutch national government and various stakeholders. In fact, the government is one of the participants in the Green Deals. On the contrary, WRAP agreements are funded by the UK government and organized by WRAP. Thus, the government does not participate directly in the agreements.
Summary of the Study. This study has been subdivided into five chapters each as described below;
Summary of the Study. [Drafting note: The 250 word (max) “Study Summary” from Application Form to be included] Study Participants and/or approved subcontractors for Major Subcontract Work [Drafting note: Recipient to complete. Clearly outline the role of each on the Study Participant and approved subcontractors for Major Subcontract Work.] Organisation Role Description of role in the Study [Consultant] [Study Participant/ approved subcontractor for Major Subcontract Work] [Recipient] has engaged Consultant XXX to assist in delivering the Study report. Outputs Under this Agreement, the following Outputs are to be provided A finalised [Feasibility or Engineering – select as appropriate] Study Report as described at Schedule 1, Item 4.6: Other knowledge Sharing Deliverables as set out in item 4 of Schedule 1 (Knowledge Sharing Plan) Outcomes [Drafting Note: the below text is to be included for Feasibility Studies, delete text not used:] The Study will deliver the following Outcomes: Enable a decision by the Applicant to either proceed to fund implementation of the studied Project or proceed to a more detailed engineering study of the studied Project; Inform industry of the barriers to implementation of the studied Project and potential solutions to these barriers; Accelerate uptake of similar projects across industry; and Enable accelerated transformational improvement in industrial renewable energy and/or energy efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions compared to baseline or business as usual. [Drafting Note: the below text is to be included for Engineering Studies, delete text not used:] The Study will deliver the following Outcomes: Enable a Final Investment Decision regarding whether proceed to fund implementation of the studied Project; Inform industry of the barriers to implementation of the studied Project and potential solutions to these barriers; Accelerate uptake of similar projects across industry; and Enable accelerated transformational improvement in industrial renewable energy and/or energy efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions compared to baseline or business as usual. Milestones (clause 2) The Recipient must achieve the following Milestones and provide the Milestone Deliverables and any Reports in a form and substance satisfactory to ARENA, by the Completion date of the relevant Milestone. No. Description of Milestone and Milestone Deliverables Completion date Amount of Milestone payment (GST excl.)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Summary of the Study

  • Project Summary The main objective of the LIFE GAIA Sense project is to demonstrate gaiasense, an innovative “Smart Farming” (SF) solution that aims at reducing the consumption of natural resources, as a way to protect the environment and support Circular Economy (CE) models. More specifically, this project will launch 18 demonstrators across Greece, Spain and Portugal covering 9 crops (olives, peaches, cotton, pistachio, potatoes, table tomatoes, industrial tomatoes, grapes, kiwi) in various terrain and microclimatic conditions. They will demonstrate an innovative method, based on high-end technology, which is suitable for being replicated and will be accessible and affordable to Farmers either as individuals or collectively through Agricultural Cooperatives. Moreover, LIFE GAIA Sense aims to promote resource efficiency practices in SMEs of the agricultural sector and eventually, contribute to the implementation of the Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe. This project will demonstrate a method on how the farmer will be able to decide either to use or avoid inputs (irrigation, fertilizers, pesticides etc.) in a most efficient way, without risking the annual production. The focus is on the resource consumption reduction side of CE, and the results will be both qualitatively and quantitatively, considering the resources’ efficiency in agricultural sector.

  • Project Description In two or three brief sentences, provide a concise description of your exhibition. Include the subject matter, type of objects to be included (paintings, sculpture, manuscripts, etc.), those responsible for organizing the exhibition, and catalogue author(s).

  • Budget Summary Other Sources (Page BudgetSum 2-3 - Acct 7000), must equal Other Uses (BudgetSum 2-3 - Acct. 8000). Estimated Beginning Fund Balance July,1 2020 for all Funds (Cells C3 - K3) (Line must have a number or zero. Do not leave blank.) OK Estimated Activity Fund Beginning Fund Balance July,1 2020 (Cell C83) (Cell must have a number or zero. Do not leave blank.) OK Transfer Among Funds (Funds 10, 20, 40 - Acct 7130 - Cells C29, D29, F29), must equal (Funds 10, 20 & 40 - Acct 8130 - Cells C52, D52, F52). OK Transfer of Interest (Funds 10 thru 90 - Acct 7140 - Cells C30:K30), must equal (Funds 10 thru 60, & 80 - Acct 8140 - Cells C53:H53, J53). OK Transfer to Debt Service to Pay Principal on Capital Leases (Fund 30 - Acct 7400 - Cell E39) must equal (Funds 10, 20 & 60 - Acct 8400 Cells C57:H60). OK Transfer to Debt Service to Pay Interest on Capital Leases (Fund 30 - Acct 7500 - Cell E40) must equal (Funds 10, 20 & 60 - Acct 8500 - Cells C61:H64). OK Transfer to Debt Service Fund to Pay Principal on Revenue Bonds (Fund 30 - Acct 7600 - Cell E41) must equal (Funds 10 & 20 - Acct 8600 - Cells C65:D68). OK Transfer to Debt Service to Pay Interest on Revenue Bonds (Fund 30 - Acct 7700 - Cell E42) must equal (Funds 10 & 20 - Acct 8700 - Cells C69:D72). OK Transfer to Capital Projects Fund (Fund 60 - Acct 7800 - Cell H43) must equal (Fund 10 & 20, Acct 8800 - Cells C73:D76). OK

  • Task Description This task includes activities associated with permit-required monitoring conducted in accordance with the conditions specified by state or federal regulatory agencies. All monitoring tasks must be located within or adjacent to the Project area and follow the Department’s Regional Coastal Monitoring Program and FWC's marine turtle and shorebird monitoring programs. Guidance for monitoring of nearshore resources is available in the Department's Standard Operation Procedures For Nearshore Hardbottom Monitoring Of Beach Nourishment Projects. The Local Sponsor must submit work products directly to the appropriate state or federal regulatory agencies in accordance with permit conditions to be eligible for reimbursement under this task, unless otherwise directed.

  • Development Phase contractual phase initiated with the approval of ANP for the Development Plan and which is extended during the Production Phase while investments in xxxxx, equipment, and facilities for the Production of Oil and Gas according to the Best Practices of the Oil Industry are required.

  • Work Description T-804 Opening Roads - Removal of closure devices, cleaning ditches, removing berms, and blading the traveled-way T-811 Closing Roads - Entrance treatment for 150' cross-rip; debris block (slash, earth, berm, rocks, etc.) + seed + water bar T-811 Closing Roads - Water bar frequency per BMPs for remainder of road T-811 Closing Roads - Engineering Rep. or Construction Inspector must be notified prior to performing closeout NFSR Road No. Lane Width & Maintenance Level Mile Marker Begin End 9302 Single Lane / Level 2 NFSR 300 0.00 END 0.58

  • Development Plan document specifying the work program, schedule, and relevant investments required for the Development and the Production of a Discovery or set of Discoveries of Oil and Gas in the Contract Area, including its abandonment.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.