SUMMARY OF THE RESULTS Sample Clauses

SUMMARY OF THE RESULTS. The Parties shall promptly summarize a report on the results of the Joint Research in cooperation with each other.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
SUMMARY OF THE RESULTS. We conclude the results section with a summary of our findings as they pertain to our three re- search hypotheses. We find strong support for Hypothesis 1. The higher bonus amounts do in- duce higher orders. We do not find general support of Hypothesis 2. The relationship between the order amount and the length of the review period does not generally confirm theoretical pre- dictions. In fact, what we find is evidence that for medium and high bonuses, longer review pe- riods induce higher orders, independent of the bonus. For low bonuses, orders under both review periods tend to be above their theoretical benchmarks and not different from one another. Of course since our laboratory study included review periods of only two different lengths, the gen- erality of this conclusion is limited. For medium bonuses (B=25) the optimal order for T=2 is 70 and for T=8 it is 86, so the fact that the longer review period induces higher ordering levels is consistent with the theoretical prediction. But for high bonuses (B = 50) higher orders in the T=8 conditions are the opposite of the theoretical prediction. In those treatments, participants start by ordering too low and adjust in the direction of the optimal order, but because of the high probability of observing the fill rate of 100% in the T=2 treatment, they do not adjust their orders sufficiently. In the T=8 treatment, the feedback is more reliable, and consequently participants are able to come closer to the opti- mal order. One way to bring a common framework to our results is by noting a combination of be- havioral effects. As we can see from Table 4, a bonus impacts players’ orders in two ways: (1) in the initial order, and (2) in the direction of the order-up-to level adjustment. The anchoring effect on the initial order may be influenced by the availability heuristic (Xxxxxxx and Xxxxxxxx 1973) because a lump-sum bonus is more “available” than the holding or backorder costs, caus- ing players to adjust orders accordingly. Because higher bonuses also increase optimal order-up- to levels, this has an impact on the location of players’ orders relative to theoretical predictions. Players seem to over-adjust the order-up-to level amount when given small bonuses and under- adjust when given higher bonuses. When no bonus is present no adjustment takes place. This brings us to Hypothesis 3 (Anchoring and insufficient adjustment) for which we do find some support. Interestingly, our data suggests that the anchor is ...
Sample 1
SUMMARY OF THE RESULTS. For all measured dependent variables (except deviation) the main effects of tool, velocity, and movement were significant at the 5 % significance level (Table 6). The main effect of location was significant for pleasure and arousal. At the starting point of the approach toward the robot participants experienced higher levels of pleasure and lower levels of arousal. Participants moved closer to the robot, experienced higher levels of pleasure and lower levels of arousal, perceived the robot as safer, and had higher intentions to collaborate with the robot when the robot moved slowly, used a safe tool, and moved up/down, left/right, or performed a circular left/right movement. Participants stopped earlier in front of the robot, experienced lower levels of pleasure and higher levels of arousal, perceived the robot as less safe, and had lower intentions to collaborate with the robot when the robot used a dangerous tool, moved quickly, and performed forward/backwards, random, and circular forward/backwards movements. The effect of the tool was by far the strongest, which could be due to the fact that the robot was using a really dangerous tool – a large kitchen knife – which can normally elicit higher arousal. The effect of velocity was, on average, the second largest effect. The tool of the robot (safe versus dangerous) and velocity of the robot (slow versus fast) were found to be the most important factors of human-robot interaction. The third largest effect was the main effect of movement type, which also should not be neglected when designing a human-robot interaction. Participants felt less safe, experienced higher levels of arousal and unsafety and lower level of pleasure and intention to collaborate when the movements were random and forward/backward. Random movement is probably perceived as more unpredictable and unsmooth. Forward/backward movement can represent a movement that mimics the movement of an attacking or hitting something and therefore provokes unpleasant feelings. The most frequent significant two-way interactions were between velocity and movement and between location and tool. All two-way interactions were weak, especially compared to main effects. There was just one significant three-way interaction (i.e., between location, tool and velocity on pleasure) and no significant four-way interaction. Table 6: Summary of significant main effects and interactions. Mean deviation CZ1 CZ2 Pleasure Arousal Perceived safety Collaboration Location / ...
Sample 1

Related to SUMMARY OF THE RESULTS

  • - OWNERSHIP/USE OF THE RESULTS II.3.1 Unless stipulated otherwise in this agreement, ownership of the results of the action, including industrial and intellectual property rights, and of the reports and other documents relating to it shall be vested in the beneficiary.

  • Material Changes Except as contemplated in the Prospectus, or disclosed in the Company’s reports filed with the Commission, there shall not have been any material adverse change in the authorized capital stock of the Company or any Material Adverse Effect or any development that would reasonably be expected to cause a Material Adverse Effect, or a downgrading in or withdrawal of the rating assigned to any of the Company’s securities (other than asset backed securities) by any rating organization or a public announcement by any rating organization that it has under surveillance or review its rating of any of the Company’s securities (other than asset backed securities), the effect of which, in the case of any such action by a rating organization described above, in the reasonable judgment of the Agent (without relieving the Company of any obligation or liability it may otherwise have), is so material as to make it impracticable or inadvisable to proceed with the offering of the Placement Shares on the terms and in the manner contemplated in the Prospectus.

  • Results The five values obtained shall be arranged in order and the median value taken as a result of the measurement. This value shall be expressed in Newtons per centimetre of width of the tape. Annex 7 Minimum requirements for sampling by an inspector

  • ADVERTISING RESULTS The prior written approval of the Commissioner is required in order for results of the Bid to be used by the Contractor as part of any commercial advertising. The Contractor shall also obtain the prior written approval of the Commissioner relative to the Bid or Contract for press or other media releases.

  • Publication of Results The National Aeronautics and Space Act (51 U.S.C. § 20112) requires NASA to provide for the widest practicable and appropriate dissemination of information concerning its activities and the results thereof. As such, NASA may publish unclassified and non-Proprietary Data resulting from work performed under this Agreement. The Parties will coordinate publication of results allowing a reasonable time to review and comment.

  • SUMMARY As provided in the Fifth Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement of the Trust, as amended from time to time (the “Trust Agreement”) as currently in effect and described in the applicable Prospectus (defined below), units of fractional undivided beneficial interest in and ownership of each Fund (individually and collectively, the “Shares”) may be created or redeemed by the Managing Owner for an Authorized Participant in aggregations of two hundred thousand (200,000) Shares (each aggregation, a “Basket”). Baskets are offered only pursuant to the applicable registration statement of the Trust, with respect to all the Funds, excluding the DBA Fund and the DBS Fund, on Form S-3, with respect to the DBA Fund on Form S-3ASR, and with respect to the DBS Fund on Form S-1, as amended (Registration Nos.: 333-203008 et seq. with respect to all the Funds, excluding the DBA Fund and the DBS Fund; Registration Nos.: 333-185865 et seq. with respect to the DBA Fund only; Registration Nos.: 333-193222 et seq. with respect to the DBS Fund only), as currently effective and on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and as the same may be amended from time to time thereafter or any successor registration statement in respect of Shares of each Fund (each, a “Registration Statement,” collectively, the “Registration Statements”) together with the prospectuses of the Trust in the form filed with the SEC under Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”), after the effectiveness of the Registration Statements (each, a “Prospectus,” collectively, the “Prospectuses”). Under the Trust Agreement, the Managing Owner is authorized to issue Baskets to, and redeem Baskets from, Authorized Participants, (i) through the Continuous Net Settlement (“CNS”) clearing processes of the National Securities Clearing Corporation (the “NSCC”) as such processes have been enhanced to effect purchases and redemptions of Creation Baskets and Redemption Baskets (the “CNS Clearing Process”), or (ii) if outside the CNS Clearing Process, only through the facilities of The Depository Trust Company (“DTC” or the “Depository”) (the “DTC Process”), or a successor depository, and only in exchange for cash. This Agreement sets forth the specific procedures by which an Authorized Participant may create or redeem Baskets. For the avoidance of doubt, the term “Prospectus” shall mean the Prospectus for the DBA Fund, the Prospectus for the DBS Fund or the Prospectus for all of the Funds, excluding the DBA Fund and the DBS Fund, as the context requires. Because new Shares for each Fund can be created and issued by the Trust on an ongoing basis, at any point during the life of each respective Fund, a “distribution,” as such term is used in the 1933 Act, may be occurring. The Authorized Participant is cautioned that some of its activities may result in its being deemed a participant in a distribution in a manner that would render it a statutory underwriter and subject it to the prospectus delivery and liability provisions of the 1933 Act. The Authorized Participant should review the “Plan of Distribution” section of the applicable Prospectus and consult with its own counsel in connection with entering into this Agreement and submitting a Purchase Order Subscription Agreement (defined below). Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Agreement shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Trust Agreement. To the extent there is a conflict between any provision of this Agreement and the provisions of the Trust Agreement, the provisions of the Trust Agreement shall control. To the extent there is a conflict between any provision of this Agreement and the provisions of the applicable Prospectus, the applicable Prospectus shall control. For the avoidance of doubt, any action which is an action being taken by the Managing Owner may be taken by a party whom the Managing Owner has duly authorized to take such action. To give effect to the foregoing premises and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth below, the parties hereto agree as follows:

  • Pricing The Contractor will not exceed the pricing set forth in the Contract documents.

  • POSITION SUMMARY The incumbent provides a variety of heavy cleaning, transporting of furniture/ equipment and other related housekeeping functions in our corporate apartments, to maintain an orderly and sanitary condition. The incumbent must fulfill the requirements of the Criminal Records/Vulnerable Person, Child Abuse Registry Check and Adult Abuse Registry Check, and adhere to all Northern Health Region policies and procedures. QUALIFICATIONS • Grade 12 or equivalent • Must have a valid Manitoba Class V driver’s license and access to a vehicle and willingness to travel the region year around • Certificate for ‘Environmental Services & Infection Control’ Training Course or willingness to obtain • Previous housekeeping experience preferred • Knowledge of Infection Control Procedures as they relate to your duties • Ability to understand and follow verbal and written communication • Demonstrates interpersonal skills through clear communication and positive behavior within the Respectful Workplace Policy • Must be able and capable of lifting and/ or lifting equipment or items as required utilizing proper body mechanics as instructed • Demonstrated ability to work with minimal supervision • Ability to respect and promote a cultural diverse population • Must have a good employment record, including attendance at work • Demonstrated ability to work in a team environment • Satisfactory employment record required • Successful candidate subject to provide security checks in accordance with Security Checks for Employment Policy (HR-02-80. Waived for internal candidates with current checks on file. For a full listing of qualifications please: • Internal Candidates: Refer to the Job Description which is posted on the Intranet under Department/Human Resources/Job Description, then select the applicable department; or, • External Candidates: Contact Human Resources to request a copy Northern RHA strives to have a diverse workforce in an inclusive and accessible workplace, which provides opportunity for reasonable accommodation. Indigenous applicants are encouraged to self-declare when submitting applications & resumes. We thank all candidates for applying. Only those selected for interview will be contacted. Using Google Chrome, Apply online at xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx on or before OPEN UNTIL FILLED Note: In the event of technical difficulties with the online application, please contact Human Resources at XXXXxxxxxxx@xxxx.xx for assistance prior to the closing date.

  • Evaluation Results A. Evaluation results shall be used:

  • Implementation of the Report 1. The Panel report shall be final and binding on the disputing Parties. 2. If the report issued by the Panel determines that a Party has not conformed with its obligations under this Agreement, the Party complained against shall eliminate the non- conformity. 3. The Party complained against shall comply with the recommendation of the Panel promptly or, if not practicable, within a reasonable period of time. The Parties shall agree on reasonable period of time within 30 days of the notification of the report of the Panel. In any case, such reasonable period of time shall not exceed 300 calendar days after the release of the report.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.