Summary of Agreement. 2.1. The owners include their respective successors in title and shall now be ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ “ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ”.
Summary of Agreement. Answer the following questions relevant to each agreement issue (Be Specific): To what complaint issue is the particular agreement tied? How will it be implemented or carried out? Who is responsible for carrying it out? What are the associated timelines? If services are to be rendered on a trial basis, what happens at the end of the trial? Provide specific if/then scenarios. (Use additional pages if necessary). This resolution agreement is in effect for (select one) Time specified in the agreement School year in question Until circumstances change asdetermined by the IEP team Signature of Parent/Guardian OR Adult Student Typed Name of Parent/Guardian OR Adult Student Date Signature of School Representative Typed Name of School Representative Date Signature of Resolution Session Facilitator Typed Name of Resolution Session Facilitator Date Please mail to: Dispute Resolution Coordinator Department of Public Instruction Office of Special Education 000 X Xxxx Xxx, Xxxx 000
Summary of Agreement. To summarize, PacifiCorp and the Division have agreed to measure the improvements in system reliability based on the establishment of a system performance baseline using fiscal year 2002 (April 1, 2001 through March 31, 2002) data. The reliability target the Company needs to deliver during fiscal year 2005 (April 1, 2004 through March 31, 2005) will be a normalized SAIDI of 217 and XXXXX of 2.2. This target delivers a greater than 2% improvement per year, over a three-year measurement period. This target builds upon the Company’s estimate of the 15% improvement in performance already achieved from fiscal 2001 (April 1, 2000 through March 31, 2001) to fiscal 2002 (April 1, 2001 through March 31, 2002). The Company will exclude from performance measurements those events that meet the definition for a major event and have been approved by the Commission. The Company will also develop a data quality indicator using orphan trouble calls, untied customer percentages, and calculate an estimate of untied unreported customer minutes lost. The Company will cooperate with the Division to audit the results of these calculations. By using the proposed targets, exclusion processes and accuracy measures the Company and the Division believe the Company will deliver reliability improvements at least equivalent to that agreed to in Docket No. 00-0000-00 with regard to Performance Standards 1 and 2. Signed Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, Manager PacifiCorp Signed Xxxxxx Xxx Xx., Director Utah Division of Public Utilities Date Date Appendix SAIDI: System Average Interruption Duration Index = Customer Minutes Lost (for the Period in Question)/Frozen Customer Count (for the Period in Question) XXXXX: System Average Interruption Frequency Index = Customers Interrupted (for the Period in Question)/Frozen Customer Count (for the Period in Question) Customer Minutes Lost (CML): Customer Minutes Lost is the sum of all sustained outage’s outage duration for the period in question. This value is reported using the Prosper/US database.
Summary of Agreement. The Owners have agreed to purchase the Property for use as living accommodation ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ .
Summary of Agreement. South Puget Sound Federation of Teachers Local Number 4603, AFT/AFL-CIO July 1, 2021-June 30, 2025 Term Agreement Base compensation Appendix A Faculty Pay Scale Overtime pay N/A Compensatory time N/A Other compensation Article 9, Appendix A Paid leave Article 8 Cash out Article 8 Temporary layoff N/A Impasse procedures N/A Health care Article 7 Bargaining units covered Article 1, Article 2 Supplemental agreements N/A Provisions to allow reopening Article 16
Summary of Agreement. (A) This Agreement between the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) and the Department for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) sets out the procedures that will be followed and the safeguards that have been put in place to ensure that the data shared between the two organisations, referred to below, complies with: “(i) the GDPR and any applicable national implementing laws as amended from time to time; (ii) the DPA 2018 to the extent that it relates to processing of personal data and privacy; (iii) all applicable law about the processing of personal data and privacy. This agreement will be placed in the public domain.
Summary of Agreement. This section will detail the specifics of the agreement as it pertains to the XXX in each respective City / County Council.
Summary of Agreement. Payment: Dow Corning or its agent will pay $US 25,126,797.94 over seven (7) years to settle this Class Action. To make a claim, you do not have to prove causation, but you do have to prove that (a) you registered to participate in this Settlement, (b) you have or had Dow Corning Breast Implants or implants containing Dow Corning Breast Implant Raw Materials, and (c) (if applicable for the claim option that you select) you experienced Rupture or you have one of the Designated Medical Conditions described in the Agreement. You may choose among the following claim options:
Summary of Agreement. It is very helpful to both parties if an accurate detail of the generator being leased has been agreed ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
Summary of Agreement. Indiana State University agrees to completion of the special emphasis self-study under the terms set forth above, which are listed in summary form below. • Define need for and nature of the special emphasis self-study focus; • Use of outline format for the self-study that indicates the Criteria of Accreditation will be addressed; • Statement of institution’s capacity to support the special emphasis initiative; • Statement of institution’s commitment to report the comprehensive results of the special emphasis as a part of the self-study and to being evaluated, in part, on the conduct of the outcomes achieved through the special emphasis; • Commitment to provide the Commission with follow-up, generally through a later consultative visit, on the recommendations (internal and external) and utilization of the findings resulting from the self-study and evaluation processes. Upon execution of this agreement, Commission staff will work with institutional representatives in organizing the special emphasis self-study, selecting team members, arranging the on-site visit, following the review process to completion, and monitoring institution/Commission follow-up. The Consultant-Evaluators Team conducts the comprehensive evaluation visit to determine the institution’s fulfillment of the Criteria for Accreditation, and evaluate the special emphasis initiative under the agreed upon format and provide consultative advice regarding the outcomes achieved and, under special conditions, participate in follow-up activities as may have been proposed as a part of the special emphasis focus. Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx XXX Date President, Indiana State University Xxxxxx X. Xxxx Date
