Substantially Similar Submittals Sample Clauses

Substantially Similar Submittals. To the extent that a Submittal relating to a CNG Facility is substantially similar to a Submittal previously issued by the Development Entity in respect of another CNG Facility and the context and circumstances are substantially similar (such a Submittal being a Substantially Similar Submittal), the Department shall not raise a comment on such Submittal that is inconsistent with its previous comments in respect of the Substantially Similar Submittal. For the avoidance of doubt, if the Department did not previously raise any comment on the Substantially Similar Submittal, then any relevant comment raised in respect of such Submittal shall be deemed inconsistent for the purposes of this Section 4.6 (Substantially Similar Submittals).
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Substantially Similar Submittals. To the extent that a Submittal relating to a Project Facility is substantially similar to a Submittal previously issued by the Development Entity in respect of such Project Facility and the context and circumstances are substantially similar (such a Submittal being a Substantially Similar Submittal), the Department shall not raise a comment on such Submittal that is inconsistent with its previous comments in respect of the Substantially Similar Submittal unless any circumstances related to such Project Facility have changed or any new issues have arisen with respect to such Project Facility.
Substantially Similar Submittals. To the extent that a Submittal relating to a Replacement Bridge is substantially similar to a Submittal previously issued by the Development Entity in respect of another Replacement Bridge and the context and circumstances are substantially similar (such a Submittal being a Substantially Similar Submittal), the Department shall not raise a comment on such Submittal that is inconsistent with its previous comments in respect of the Substantially Similar Submittal (for the avoidance of doubt, if the Department did not previously raise any comment on the Substantially Similar Submittal, then any relevant comment raised in respect of such Submittal shall be deemed inconsistent for the purposes of this Section 4.6 (Substantially Similar Submittals)).

Related to Substantially Similar Submittals

  • Environmentally Preferable Procurement Policy The Environmentally Preferable Procurement Policy, along with a brief policy description, is located on the City’s website at the following link: xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx/esd/natural-energy-resources/epp.htm. Environmental procurement policies and activities related to the completion of any Work will include, whenever practicable, but are not limited to:  The use of recycled and/or recyclable products in daily operations (i.e. 30%, 50%, 100% PCW paper, chlorine process free, triclosan free hand cleaner, etc.);  The use of energy-star compliant equipment;  The use of alternative fuel and hybrid vehicles, and implementation of protocols aimed at increasing the efficiency of vehicle operation;  The implementation of internal waste reduction and reuse protocol(s); and  Water and resource conservation activities within facilities, including bans on individual serving bottled water and the use of compostable food service products.

  • Treatment Program Testing The Employer may request or require an employee to undergo drug and alcohol testing if the employee has been referred by the employer for chemical dependency treatment or evaluation or is participating in a chemical dependency treatment program under an employee benefit plan, in which case the employee may be requested or required to undergo drug or alcohol testing without prior notice during the evaluation or treatment period and for a period of up to two years following completion of any prescribed chemical dependency treatment program.

  • Training Designation Type Code Select and insert the appropriate training credit designation type code: Code Short Description Long Description (If Applicable) 01 Undergraduate Credit N/A 02 Graduate Credit N/A 03 Continuing Education Unit N/A 04 Post Graduate Credit N/A 05 N/A N/A

  • How to File an Appeal of a Prescription Drug Denial For denials of a prescription drug claim based on our determination that the service was not medically necessary or appropriate, or that the service was experimental or investigational, you may request an appeal without first submitting a request for reconsideration. You or your physician may file a written or verbal prescription drug appeal with our pharmacy benefits manager (PBM). The prescription drug appeal must be submitted to us within one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the initial determination letter. You will receive written notification of our determination within thirty (30) calendar days from the receipt of your appeal. How to File an Expedited Appeal Your appeal may require immediate action if a delay in treatment could seriously jeopardize your health or your ability to regain maximum function, or would cause you severe pain. To request an expedited appeal of a denial related to services that have not yet been rendered (a preauthorization review) or for on-going services (a concurrent review), you or your healthcare provider should call: • our Grievance and Appeals Unit; or • our pharmacy benefits manager for a prescription drug appeal. Please see Section 9 for contact information. You will be notified of our decision no later than seventy-two (72) hours after our receipt of the request. You may not request an expedited review of covered healthcare services already received.

  • Drug and Alcohol Testing – Safety-Sensitive Functions A. Employees required to have a Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) are subject to pre-employment, post-accident, random and reasonable suspicion testing in accordance with the U.S. Department of Transportation rules, Coast Guard Regulations (46 CFR Part 16) or the Federal Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act of 1991. The testing will be conducted in accordance with current Employer policy.

  • COVID-19 Protocols Contractor will abide by all applicable COVID-19 protocols set forth in the District’s Reopening and COVID-19 Mitigation Plan and the safety guidelines for COVID-19 prevention established by the California Department of Public Health and the Ventura County Department of Public Health.

  • Screening 3.13.1 Refuse containers located outside the building shall be fully screened from adjacent properties and from streets by means of opaque fencing or masonry walls with suitable landscaping.

  • Proposing Integration Activities in the Planning Submission No integration activity described in section 6.3 may be proposed in a CAPS unless the LHIN has consented, in writing, to its inclusion pursuant to the process set out in section 6.3(b).

  • HIV/AIDS Model Workplace Guidelines Grantee will:

  • Safety Glasses 10.3.1 Where a teacher is considered to be working in an “eye danger” area, the teacher shall receive a personal issue of standard neutral safety glasses which shall remain the property of the employer.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.