SUBSTANTIALLY IMPAIRED Sample Clauses

SUBSTANTIALLY IMPAIRED. The Device has one or more of the following issues: 1. The Device has functional damage or product failure that affects its ability to perform its function or impairs its use and cannot be easily repaired;
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
SUBSTANTIALLY IMPAIRED. The Device has one or more of the following issues: 1. The Device has functional damage or product failure that affects its ability to perform its function or impairs its use and cannot be easily repaired; 2. The Device has been recalled by its manufacturer and has not been repaired or replaced prior to sending it to CWG; 3. The Device has water damage or damage from bodily fluids; 4. The Device shows indications of a serial number modification; 5. The Device has insect/rodent infestation, damage. All damage described above must be repaired either under manufacturer warranty or service plan, or at your own cost, before providing the Device to CWG. The Device will not be accepted in Substantially Impaired condition and CWG will retain the Plan Fee you paid. If the Device is considered to be Substantially Impaired, the Device will be considered a Rejected Device as provided in Paragraph 11. SCHEDULE OF BUY BACK AMOUNT AS ADJUSTED TO ACCOUNT FOR ACCEPTANCE TESTING* TVs, Laptops, Desktops, All-in-One Computers, Tablets, Mobile Phones, Pre-Paid Mobile Phones, Computer Monitors, Blu-ray & DVDplayers, Gaming Consoles, Portable Gaming Devices, eReaders, Camcorders, Digital Cameras, DSLRs, SoundBars, GPSs & ipods/mp3 players TVs Only Acceptance 6 Months After 6 Months After 12 After 18 After 24 Testing from to 12 Months Months to 18 Months to 24 Months to 48 Condition Effective from Effective Months from Months from Months from Grade Date Date Effective Date Effective Date Effective Date Good or Fair Up to 50% Up to 40% Up to 30% Up to 20% Up to 20% Poor Up to 25% Up to 20% Up to 15% Up to 10% Up to 10% * The Buy Back Amount is expressed as a percentage of the Original Purchase Price of the Device. The Buy Back Amount may be reduced from that listed in the schedule due to missing or inoperable accessories or included items, as provided for in the paragraph below. Accessories and Included Items. The Device is expected to be returned with all Accessories. These include, but are not limited to, original software, power adapters, cables, pedestals (TV), remotes and batteries. Each Accessory is expected to be in good condition and in working order. Buy Back Amounts will be further reduced at the sole discretion of CWG by the replacement value of each such Accessory that is either not included with your Device or is not in good condition or in working order regardless of the Acceptance Testing Condition Grade that is ultimately assigned to your Device. As a result, even ...
Sample 1
SUBSTANTIALLY IMPAIRED. The Device has one or more of the following issues: 1. The Device has functional damage or product failure that affects its ability to perform its function or impairs its use and cannot be easily repaired; 2. One or more of the Device’s components, peripherals, or accessories is missing or damaged and cannot be easily repaired or replaced; 3. The Device has been recalled by its manufacturer and has not been repaired or replaced prior to sending it to TechForward. All damage described above must be repaired either under warranty, or at Your own cost before sending the Device to TechForward. The Device will not be accepted in Substantially Impaired condition and TechForward will retain the Service Fee You paid. If the Device is considered to be Substantially Impaired, the Device will be considered Rejected Device as provided in Paragraph 9.
Sample 1

Related to SUBSTANTIALLY IMPAIRED

  • Needs Improvement the Educator’s performance on a standard or overall is below the requirements of a standard or overall, but is not considered to be unsatisfactory at this time. Improvement is necessary and expected.

  • Substantial Completion Date Substantial Completion of the Work as defined in Article 6.1.2 of the General Conditions to the Continuing Contract for Construction Management shall be achieved by July 31, 2022.

  • Asset Improvement 5. (a) The Bank shall not, directly or indirectly, extend or renew any credit to or for the benefit of any borrower, including any related interest of the borrower, who is obligated to the Bank in any manner on any extension of credit or portion thereof that has been charged off by the Bank or classified, in whole or in part, “loss” in the Report of Examination or in any subsequent report of examination, as long as such credit remains uncollected.

  • Expansive Protocols Where the capability exists, originating or terminating traffic reroutes may be implemented by either party to temporarily relieve network congestion due to facility failures or abnormal calling patterns. Reroutes will not be used to circumvent normal trunk servicing. Expansive controls will only be used when mutually agreed to by the parties.

  • Status Substantial Compliance Analysis The Compliance Officer found that PPB is in substantial compliance with Paragraph 80. See Sections IV and VII Report, p. 17. COCL carefully outlines the steps PPB has taken—and we, too, have observed—to do so. Id. We agree with the Compliance Officer’s assessment. In 2018, the Training Division provided an extensive, separate analysis of data concerning ECIT training. See Evaluation Report: 2018 Enhanced Crisis Intervention Training, Training usefulness, on-the-job applications, and reinforcing training objectives, February 2019. The Training Division assessed survey data showing broad officer support for the 2018 ECIT training. The survey data also showed a dramatic increase in the proportion of officers who strongly agree that their supervisors are very supportive of the ECIT program, reaching 64.3% in 2018, compared to only 14.3% in 2015: The Training Division analyzed the survey results of the police vehicle operator training and supervisory in-service training, as well. These analyses were helpful in understanding attendees’ impressions of training and its application to their jobs, though the analyses did not reach as far as the ECIT’s analysis of post-training on- the-job assessment. In all three training analyses, Training Division applied a feedback model to shape future training. This feedback loop was the intended purpose of Paragraph 80. PPB’s utilization of feedback shows PPB’s internalization of the remedy. We reviewed surveys of Advanced Academy attendees, as well. Attendees were overwhelmingly positive in response to the content of most classes. Though most respondents agreed on the positive aspects of keeping the selected course in the curriculum, a handful of attendees chose options like “redundant” and “slightly disagree,” indicating that the survey tools could be used for critical assessment and not merely PPB self-validation. We directly observed PPB training and evaluations since our last report. PPB provided training materials to the Compliance Officer and DOJ in advance of training. Where either identified issues, PPB worked through those issues and honed its materials. As Paragraph 80 requires, PPB’s training included competency-based evaluations, namely: knowledge checks (i.e., quizzes on directives), in-class responsive quizzes (using clickers to respond to questions presented to the group); knowledge tests (examinations via links PPB sent to each student’s Bureau-issued iPhone); demonstrated skills and oral examination (officers had to show proficiency in first aid skills, weapons use, and defensive tactics); and scenario evaluations (officers had to explain their reasoning for choices after acting through scenarios). These were the same sort of competency-based evaluations we commended in our last report. In this monitoring period, PPB applied the same type of evaluations to supervisory-level training as well as in-service training for all sworn members. PPB successfully has used the surveys, testing, and the training audit.

  • MEDICALLY FRAGILE STUDENTS 1. If a teacher will be providing instructional or other services to a medically fragile student, the teacher or another adult who will be present when the instruction or other services are being provided will be advised of the steps to be taken in the event an emergency arises relating to the student's medical condition.

  • CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT 3.1 The Supplier shall adopt a policy of continuous improvement in relation to the Services pursuant to which it will regularly review with the Authority the Services and the manner in which it is providing the Services with a view to reducing the Authority's costs (including the Framework Prices), the costs of Contracting Bodies and/or improving the quality and efficiency of the Services. The Supplier and the Authority will provide to each other any information which may be relevant to assisting the objectives of continuous improvement and in particular reducing costs.

  • Improvement Plan A written plan developed by the evaluator, utilized when a teacher received a Rating of Ineffective on his/her Evaluation or on any individual deficiency in the evaluation system.

  • Performance Improvement Xxxxxx Permanente and the Coalition are competing in a challenging market that is characterized by a limited workforce, changes in technology, changes in clinical practice, cultural diversity, changing demographics and high demand for quality service. The parties are committed to the enhancement of organizational performance so that working in Partnership is the way Xxxxxx Permanente does business. Under this Agreement, the parties will work together to: » develop and invest in people, including the development of and investment in managers, supervisors and union stewards; » engage employees at all levels; » align the systems and processes that support the achievement of organizational and Partnership goals; » enhance the ability of Coalition unions to advance their social mission and the welfare of their members; » recognize and reduce parallel structures; » ensure joint management-union accountability for performance; » grow membership; » redesign work processes to improve effectiveness, efficiency and work environment; » develop and xxxxxx unit-based teams; » share and establish expectations regarding broad adoption of successful practices in areas such as service, attendance, workplace safety, workforce development, cost structure reduction, scope of practice and performance-based pay; and » communicate with employees on an ongoing basis regarding performance goals and targets, as well as performance results at all levels of the organization. Each regional LMP council shall develop approaches aimed at reducing variation between medical centers, facilities and departments in the resources available for partnership. In particular, such a plan should: » ensure at a regional level there is adequate time for teams to review performance, identify opportunities for improvement, and develop and test changes to drive improvement; and » provide regional or facility support to departments as needed to cross-cover or backfill and jointly determine the most cost-effective manner to provide the support.

  • Substantial Completion “Substantial Completion” means the stage in the progress of the Work when the Work, or designated portions thereof, may still require minor modifications or adjustments but, in the Owner’s opinion, the Work has progressed to the point such that all parts of the Work under consideration are fully operational and usable for intended purposes, as evidenced by a Certificate of Substantial Completion approved by the Owner. If a Certificate of Occupancy is required by public authorities having jurisdiction over the Work, said certificate shall be issued before the Work or any portion thereof is considered substantially complete. When the Contractor considers that the Work, or a portion thereof which the Owner agrees to accept separately, is substantially complete, the Contractor shall notify Owner’s Designated Representative (sometimes referred to as the “ODR”) and request a determination as to whether the Work or designated portion thereof is substantially complete. If the ODR does not consider the Work substantially complete, the ODR will notify the Contractor giving reasons therefore. Failure on the Owner’s part to list a reason does not alter the responsibility of the Contractor to complete all Work in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. After satisfactorily completing items identified by Owner’s Designated Representative, the Contractor shall then submit another request for the ODR to determine Substantial Completion. If The ODR considers the Work substantially complete, The ODR will prepare and deliver a certificate of Substantial Completion which shall establish the date of Substantial Completion, shall include a punch list of items to be completed or corrected before final completion and final payment, shall establish the time within which the Contractor shall finish the punch list, and shall establish responsibilities of the Owner and the Contractor for security, maintenance, heat, utilities, damage to the Work, warranty and insurance. Failure to include an item on the punch list does not alter the responsibility of the Contractor to complete all Work in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The certificate of Substantial Completion shall be signed by the Owner and the Contractor to evidence acceptance of the responsibilities assigned to them in such certificate. Substantial Completion (as defined in this agreement) for all stages of the Work shall be achieved on or before the following Substantial Completion date: DATE FOR SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION: TBD Under no circumstances will the time for Substantial Completion exceed this date without a written amendment to this Agreement. THE TIMES SET FORTH IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ARE AN ESSENTIAL ELEMENT OF THE AGREEMENT. TIME LIMITS STATED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS ARE OF THE ESSENCE OF THIS AGREEMENT.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.