SUBSEQUENT VALIDATION PROCEDURES Sample Clauses

SUBSEQUENT VALIDATION PROCEDURES. 4.3.1 Participant shall manage all certified product models (new and/or annual retests) through the website interface. The documentation uploaded through this process shall include completed test report, component‐specific installation instructions, dated photos of structural integrity testing, and photo of the entire model being submitted. By completing this process, Participant stipulates that the sample tested is representative of all units produced and offered for sale. Independent of the website interface, Participants must track retest dates for all certified product models. This information, along with test documentation, must be used if questioning the information on the website interface. Discrepancies must be submitted to the XXXXX Administrator, along with the appropriate documentation kept by the company, for investigation. For new equipment which may not specifically fit into the designated types listed within the specification ASTM F1487, it is suggested Participant notify Validator upon concept and initial product development. Participant shall provide preliminary design detail and documentation of proposed new equipment to Validator. Time to review new equipment design concept and hazard analysis will be invoiced as per Appendix C Fee Schedule, Engineering Documentation Review. Validator will review design concept, and provide support for identifying gaps within proposed risk assessment. Participant may refer to Appendix D for an outline of general expectations to be included within hazard analysis/risk evaluation. For submittal of new equipment that does not specifically fit into the designated types listed within the specification, Participant shall submit applicable test results, including supporting documentation of hazard analysis/risk evaluation, per section 1.6.1 of the Standard. Validator will review documentation for content and thoroughness. Time to review new equipment design concept and hazard analysis will be invoiced as per Appendix C Fee Schedule, Engineering Documentation Review. Participant shall maintain, record, control, retain and retrieve all documentation related to design, production, product testing, and marketplace. Documentation shall be made available to Validator upon further request and/or during annual inspection(s). In the event Participant and/or Validator encounter discrepancies or disagree with interpretation of applicable product testing or hazard analysis, Validator and/or Participant may elect to defer t...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
SUBSEQUENT VALIDATION PROCEDURES. 4.3.1 The Validator will conduct scheduled inspections at the Participant’s main office each outlined in Section 4.4. Validator will inspect and record results on the XXXXX Inspection Form (see form XXXXX 04s). The Validator and the Participant’s representative will sign the XXXXX Inspection Form. The Validator will keep the original signed XXXXX Inspection Form, and a signed copy will be given to the Participant. If an annual (yearly, June 1 –May 31) inspection does not take place, a Corrective Action will be issued per Section 6.
SUBSEQUENT VALIDATION PROCEDURES. 4.3.1 The Validator will conduct scheduled inspections at the Participant’s main office each calendar year. Inspections will be performed in accordance with the detailed procedure outlined in Section 4.4. Validator will inspect and record results on the XXXXX Inspection XXXXX Inspection Form. The Validator will keep the original signed XXXXX Inspection Form, and a signed copy will be given to the Participant. If an annual (yearly, January – December) inspection does not take place, a Corrective Action will be issued per Section 6.
SUBSEQUENT VALIDATION PROCEDURES. 4.3.1 The Validator will conduct scheduled inspections at the Participant’s main office each calendar year. Inspections will be performed in accordance with the detailed procedure outlined in Section 4.4. Validator will inspect and record results on the XXXXX Inspection Form (see form XXXXX 04s). The Validator and the Participant’s representative will sign the XXXXX Inspection Form. The Validator will keep the original signed XXXXX Inspection Form, and a signed copy will be given to the Participant. If an annual (yearly, January – December) inspection does not take place, a Corrective Action will be issued per Section 6.

Related to SUBSEQUENT VALIDATION PROCEDURES

  • TERMINATION PROCEDURES The Contractor acknowledges that this Agreement may be terminated for Convenience or Default.

  • Application Procedures a) An employee applies for a listing on the system-wide registry through the employee’s Human Resources Department by completing the form in Appendix B.

  • Election Procedures Each holder of record of shares of Company Common Stock (“Holder”) shall have the right, subject to the limitations set forth in this Article II, to submit an election in accordance with the following procedures:

  • Notification Procedures To address non-compliance, the receiving Competent Authority would notify the providing Competent Authority pursuant to Article 5 of the IGA. The notification procedures would differ depending upon whether the receiving Competent Authority seeks to address administrative or other minor errors or significant non-compliance.

  • Selection Procedures In selecting the Loan Assets to be Pledged pursuant to this Agreement, no selection procedures were employed which are intended to be adverse to the interests of the Lenders.

  • RECOVERY PROCEDURES The nature and severity of any disaster will influence the recovery procedures. One crucial factor in determining how BellSouth will proceed with restoration is whether or not BellSouth's equipment is incapacitated. Regardless of who's equipment is out of service, BellSouth will move as quickly as possible to aid with service recovery; however, the approach that will be taken may differ depending upon the location of the problem.

  • Mitigation Procedures The MCP agrees to coordinate with ODM to determine specific actions that will be required of the Business Associates for mitigation, to the extent practical, of the breach. These actions will include notification to the appropriate individuals, entities, or other authorities. Notification or communication to any media outlet shall be approved, in writing, by ODM prior to any such communication being released. The MCP shall report all of its mitigation activity to ODM and shall preserve all relevant records and evidence.

  • ESCALATION PROCEDURES 48.1 The Standard Practices outlines the escalation process which may be invoked at any point in the Service Ordering, Provisioning, and Maintenance processes to facilitate rapid and timely resolution of disputes.

  • AML/KYC Procedures “AML/KYC Procedures” means the customer due diligence (CDD) procedures of a Reporting Financial Institution pursuant to the anti-money laundering or similar requirements of the jurisdiction concerned to which such Reporting Financial Institution is subject.

  • Evaluation Procedures 7.2.1 Evaluation procedures designed to fairly and adequately assess performance of full- time faculty employees shall be established and reviewed annually by the Vice President, after consultation with appropriate faculty groups at divisional/departmental meetings for their recommendations.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.