Subject Agreement Clause Samples
Subject Agreement. The Subject Agreement is in full force and effect in accordance with its terms, there are no defaults thereunder and the Assignor has not otherwise assigned, mortgaged, pledged, transferred or hypothecated the Assignor's right, title and interest in and to the Subject Agreement except as permitted under the Credit Agreement.
Subject Agreement. As already mentioned above, the form and position of the agreement markers varies in accor- dance with the aspectuals of the verbs. The agreement markers, both the subject and the object, suffix to the verb in the perfective form; and attache both in the pre-and pos verbal positions in the imperfective form.
Subject Agreement. 3.1. The Contractor undertakes to provide the Customer with access services to the Program and Additional Modules within the limits stipulated by this Agreement, and the Customer undertakes to pay for these services in accordance with the procedure stipulated by this Agreement.
3.2. by given Agreement To the customer is provided access exclusively to the Saas version of the Program and Additional modules, which does not provide for the possibility of downloading Applications and their use in offline mode, ie. out of work on the Internet site. Any attempt to download the Program or download it in any way is perceived as a violation of the terms of this Agreement and is considered as a violation of the intellectual property rights of the Performer.
Subject Agreement. As mentioned earlier, the debate surrounding the status of GFs in grammatical theory is far too complicated and long to go into here, but — especially in a volume about agreement — it is worthwhile briefly looking at how the issue relates to agreement. As ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (2012) carefully notes, whilst GFs can provide a useful heuristic of determining which elements are able to enter into agreement relations in a language, it is not pos- sible to describe all agreement patterns in terms of GFs. For instance, English looks on the surface like a language where agreement could be characterised as taking place be- tween verb and subject, given that overwhelmingly the subject of the sentence agrees with the verb (assuming that there is verbal agreement). However, there are known instances where agreement between the verb and subject fails, such as in (1), where the plural subject fails to control plural agreement (see ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Sag 1994 for discussion on these types of nouns). Thus, if we would grant that the Sbjec function exists in the grammar of English, it is not the case that all and only elements with the Sbjec function enter into verbal agreement.
(1) Human resources is on the phone. Putting such cases aside, which constitute exceptions to the general rule, the inter- esting question is whether GFs should be appealed to in the formulation of agreement rules. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (1974) and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (1978) proposes that the notion of GF plays a role in determining what is able to control agreement in a language and we can for- mulate implicational statements on the basis of these. In short, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ states that if there is agreement in a language, subjects are always able to be agreement controllers. If there are two elements that are able to control agreement, it will be subject and ob- ject. If there are three, it will be subject, object and indirect Object. Bobaljik (2008) refers to the following as the Moravcsik Hierarchy:
(2) Moravcsik Hierarchy: Subject > Object > Indirect Object > Adverb Bobaljik’s discussion of the Moravcsik Hierarchy is relevant for our purposes, be- cause, as he discusses in detail, in a language with a Nominative-Accusative case align- ment, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s hierarchy competes with an alternate characterisation of what de- termines the agreement controller, namely morphological case. It will generally be the case that in a Nominative-Accusative alignment, the subject is in nominative case whilst the direct object is in accusative case. Thus, we ...
Subject Agreement. 2.1 The Processor processes the Personal Data solely on behalf of the Controller and only in accordance with its written instructions, this DPA and MSA, unless the Processor is required to process the Personal Data based on a legal obligation. In such a case, the Processor shall notify the Controller in advance of this legal obligation, unless such notification is prohibited by law.
2.2 The nature, propose and duration of Processing as well as the categories of Personal Data and Data Subjects are outlined in Annex 1.
Subject Agreement. Generally speaking, agreement is a relation between two (or more) phrases of a clause. In its most obvious fashion, agreement results in overt morphology, the agreeing elements thus overtly showing the same set (or a subset) of features such as person, number and gender, generally refered to as ϕ-features. A well known case of agreement is subject- verb agreement, where the verb agrees with (a subset of) the subject’s ϕ-features. The ϕ-features person, number and gender are inherent features of a noun phrase, i.e. they also exist and establish references outside syntactic contexts. Thus, they are said to be 13 But see also ▇▇▇▇▇ (1986a,b), ▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Cordin (1989) and Poletto (1996) amongst others for approaches combining clitics and pro.
Subject Agreement. Buyer shall use commercially reasonable efforts to secure the satisfaction of the condition set forth in Section 2.2.3 of the Disclosure Schedule by the Deadline; provided, however, that such efforts shall not require Buyer or any of its Affiliates to incur any expenses or Liabilities or provide any financial accommodation, other than any such expenses or Liabilities set forth in the Subject Agreement on the date of this Agreement.