Student Growth Criterion Score. Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth components. These components are embedded in SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SG
Student Growth Criterion Score. The evaluator will determine a student growth score for each teacher using the student growth components embedded in the instructional framework in criteria 3, 6, and 8. These components are SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SG 6.2, and SG 8.1 Evaluators will total the raw score on these components to determine the employee score of low, average or high based on the scores below:
Student Growth Criterion Score. 1. Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as Student Growth (SG) components. These components are embedded in criteria 3, 6, and 8 as SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SG 6.2 and SG 8.1. Evaluators add up the raw score on these components, to determine the student growth criterion:
Student Growth Criterion Score. Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth components. These components are embedded in criteria as SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SG 6.2, and SG 8.1. Evaluators add up the raw score on these components and the employee is given a score of low, average, or high based on the scores below: 1. 5-12—Low 2. 13-17—Average 3. 18-20—High Student growth data will be taken from multiple sources, and must be appropriate and relevant to the teacher’s assignment. It will include teacher initiated formal and informal assessments of student progress, and may include district and state assessments of student progress. Student achievement that is not calibrated to show growth between two points in time in the current school year shall not be used to calculate a teacher’s student growth criterion score. If a teacher receives a 4 – Distinguished summative score and a Low student growth score, they must be automatically moved to the 3 – Proficient level for their summative score. If a teacher receives a 1 – Unsatisfactory on any of the five student growth components, it will trigger the student growth inquiry plan. The teacher and evaluator will mutually agree to engage in one of the following:
Student Growth Criterion Score. Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth components. These components are embedded in SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SG 6.2 and SG 8.1. Teachers on focused evaluation will be scored using student growth rubrics for Criterion 3, 6, or 8 if those criterion were included in their focus area for professional growth, or Criterion 3 or 6 if any other Criterion was selected as a focus area. For a focused evaluation, there is no student growth impact rating, but a rating of a “1” on any student growth rubric row triggers a Student Growth Inquiry Plan pursuant to WAC 392-191A-100.
Student Growth Criterion Score. 2 Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth
Student Growth Criterion Score. A. Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth components. These components are embedded in criteria as SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SG 6.2, and SG 8.1. Evaluators add up the raw score on these components and the employee is given a score of low, average or high based on the scores below: 1. 5-12—Low 2. 13-17—Average 3. 18-20—High B. Student growth data will be taken from multiple sources, and must be appropriate and relevant to the teacher’s assignment. Student achievement that is not calibrated to show growth between two points in time shall not be used to calculate a teacher’s student growth criterion score.
Student Growth Criterion Score a. The evaluator will determine the student growth impact according to the OSPI’s Student Impact Rating Scoring Band (Appendix E8). A student growth score of “1” in any of the rubric rows will result in an overall low student growth impact rating.
Student Growth Criterion Score. 3 Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated by state law 4 as student growth (SG) components. These components are embedded in criteria as SG 5 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SG 6.2, and SG 8.1. As defined by state law each classroom teacher 6 shall have one student growth goal for criteria components 3.1 and 3.2 and one student 7 growth goal for criteria components 6.1 and 6.2. SG 6.1 and SG 8.1 may be the same goal.
Student Growth Criterion Score. A. Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth components. These components are embedded in criteria as SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SG 6.2 and SG 8.1. For focused evaluations, the student growth component scores are calculated with the other components in the selected criterion. For comprehensive evaluations, evaluators add up the raw score on these components and the educator is given a score of low, average or high based on the scores below: 1. 5-12 Low 2. 13-17 Average 3. 18-20 High B. Student growth data will be taken from multiple sources, and must be appropriate and relevant to the teacher’s assignment. It will include teacher-initiated formal and informal assessments of student progress. Student achievement that is not calibrated to show growth between two points in time shall not be used to calculate a teacher’s student growth criterion score.
