STUDENT EVALUATIONS OF TEACHING Sample Clauses

STUDENT EVALUATIONS OF TEACHING. (a) Evaluations administered to assess a Faculty Member's teaching performance shall be in accordance with the requirements below, those of Senate, and with other provisions of this Agreement;
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
STUDENT EVALUATIONS OF TEACHING. 14.02(a) The evaluation of an employee’s performance may include the Supervisor’s evaluation and student evaluations.
STUDENT EVALUATIONS OF TEACHING. 26.1 (a) A primary purpose of any teaching evaluation is that of self-development and improvement.
STUDENT EVALUATIONS OF TEACHING. 19.1 (a) The primary purpose of any teaching evaluation is to provide feedback for self- development and thus promote excellence in teaching.
STUDENT EVALUATIONS OF TEACHING. The Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET) can productively inform teaching effectiveness in particular areas. In gauging teaching effectiveness, however, SETs are not to be used as the sole criterion of teaching for disciplinary measures, promotion, tenure or reappointment, or for non-reappointment with respect to full-time members of the bargaining unit and adjunct faculty who have been employed by the University for at least five (5) semesters over a five (5) calendar year period, including summer sessions (which collectively count as one semester each calendar year). Nothing contained in this Article shall be interpreted to suggest there is any expectation of continued employment at the expiration of a contract.
STUDENT EVALUATIONS OF TEACHING. The Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET) can productively inform regarding teaching effectiveness in particular areas. In gauging teaching effectiveness, however, SETs are not to be used as the sole criterion of teaching for disciplinary measures, promotion, tenure or reappointment, or for non-reappointment with respect to full-time faculty and adjunct faculty who have been employed by the University for at least five (5) semesters over a five (5) calendar year period, including summer sessions. Nothing contained in this Article shall be interpreted to suggest there is any expectation of continued employment at the expiration of a contract.
STUDENT EVALUATIONS OF TEACHING. The CBA states that student evaluations of teaching “may be stored in electronic format and incorporated by extension into the Personnel Action File provided that individuals involved in evaluations and personnel recommendations or decisions are provided secure access for these purposes.” ▪ Student Opinion Questionnaire (SOQ) instructor reports dating back to the Fall 2008 semester are stored in the Faculty Student Success Dashboard (FSSD). The FSSD is accessible through Titan Online in the Faculty Portal. Grade Distributions CSUF’s University Policy Statements 210.000 and 210.070 require faculty undergoing periodic evaluations or performance reviews to submit statistical summaries of grade distributions for each class taught in the period of review. ▪ Graded Class Lists are stored in the FSSD accessible through Titan Online in the Faculty Portal.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
STUDENT EVALUATIONS OF TEACHING. It is the Department Coordinator's responsibility to ensure that part-time faculty are evaluated by students once a quarter for each class taught. The Coordinator may select any student evaluation form which has been approved for the Tenured Faculty Evaluation process. If a new form is to be used, the process for approval will be the same as for student evaluation forms as described in section 308. The Department Coordinator, or their designee will review student evaluations for the first three quarters, and then at least annually after that. The results of the student evaluations will be made available to the faculty member, the Department Coordinator, the appropriate Xxxx and, upon request, to the Division Chair, and the CAO.

Related to STUDENT EVALUATIONS OF TEACHING

  • Student Evaluations Student evaluations shall be completed by the end of the 12th week of the fall semester.

  • Student Evaluation A. All unit members shall be subject to student evaluations each semester in each course taught.

  • TEACHER EVALUATIONS A. Each teacher shall have the right, upon request, to review the contents of his/her personal file folder.

  • Evaluation of Teaching 1. All reports on a teacher shall be in writing.

  • Obligations of the data exporter The data exporter agrees and warrants:

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Using Student feedback in Educator Evaluation ESE will provide model contract language, direction and guidance on using student feedback in Educator Evaluation by June 30, 2013. Upon receiving this model contract language, direction and guidance, the parties agree to bargain with respect to this matter.

  • Conditions of Eft Services (a.) Ownership of Card(s). Any Card we supply to you is our property and must be returned to us, or to any person whom we authorize to act as our agent, or to any person who is authorized to honor the Card, immediately according to instructions. The Card may be reclaimed at any time at our sole discretion without demand or notice. You cannot transfer your Card to another person.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. All monitoring or observation of the work performance of a teacher shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the teacher.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.