Common use of Strongly Disagree Clause in Contracts

Strongly Disagree. 1. Did not have time to adequately assess student ____ This student exhibited an eagerness to learn new things and accept responsibility for additional tasks. ____ This student was well organized. ____ This student completed agency paperwork in an accurate and timely fashion. ____ This student demonstrated respect for clients, coworkers, and others with whom she/he interacted. ____ This student demonstrated respect for issues of diversity. ____ This student acted in a professional manner. ____ This student displayed values consistent with master’s level advanced generalist social work practitioner. ____ This student displayed values consistent with master’s level advanced generalist social work practice. ____ This student practiced in a manner consistent with the ethical standards of the social work profession. ____ This student showed a commitment to lifelong learning and continued professional development. ____ This student exhibited an awareness of how issues of social justice relate to advanced generalist social work practice. ____ This student displayed an understanding of advanced generalist social work practice in public social services ____ This student used evidence from the literature as well as the student’s own evaluations to inform her or his practice interventions. ____ If given the opportunity, I would recommend this student for employment in this agency. (NA=employment-based interventions) ____ If given the opportunity, I would recommend this student for employment in the field of social services. WRITTEN COMMENTS ON OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF STUDENT: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Signature Page Educational Contract Tasks completed and Approved Student: ____________________________________________ Date: _________________________ Field Instructor: _____________________________________ Date: __________________________ Faculty Liaison: _____________________________________ Date: __________________________ Mid-Term Evaluation Completed and Approved Student: ____________________________________________ Date: _________________________ Field Instructor: _____________________________________ Date: __________________________ Faculty Liaison: _____________________________________ Date: __________________________ Final Evaluation Completed and Approved Student: ____________________________________________ Date: _________________________ Field Instructor: _____________________________________ Date: __________________________ Faculty Liaison: _____________________________________ Date: __________________________ Semester Approval

Strongly Disagree. 1. Did not have enough time to adequately assess the student _____ This student exhibited an eagerness to learn new things and accept responsibility for additional tasks. _____ This student is well organized _____ This student was well organized. ready for the field experience _____ This student completed agency paperwork in is prepared to perform as an accurate and timely fashion. entry-level social worker ____ This student demonstrated respect for clients, coworkers, and others with whom she/he interacted. ____ This student demonstrated respect for issues of diversity. ____ This student acted in a professional manner. ____ This student displayed values consistent with master’s level advanced generalist social work practitioner. ____ This student displayed values consistent with master’s level advanced generalist social work practice. ____ This student practiced in a manner consistent with the ethical standards of the social work profession. ____ This student showed a commitment to lifelong learning and continued professional development. ____ This student exhibited an awareness of how issues of social justice relate to advanced generalist social work practice. ____ This student displayed an understanding of advanced generalist social work practice in public social services ____ This student used evidence from the literature as well as the student’s own evaluations to inform her or his practice interventions. ____ If given the opportunity, I would recommend this student for employment in this agency. (NA=employment-based interventions) agency _____ If given the opportunity, I would recommend this student for employment in the field of social services. WRITTEN COMMENTS ON OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF STUDENTservices Written comments on overall performance of the student: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Signature Page Educational Contract Tasks completed and Approved Student: ____________________________________________ Date: _________________________ Field Instructor: _____________________________________ Date: __________________________ Faculty Liaison: _____________________________________ Date: __________________________ Mid-Term Evaluation Completed and Approved Student: ____________________________________________ Date: _________________________ Field Instructor: _____________________________________ Date: __________________________ Faculty Liaison: _____________________________________ Date: __________________________ Final Evaluation Completed and Approved Student: ____________________________________________ Date: _________________________ Field Instructor: _____________________________________ Date: __________________________ Faculty Liaison: _____________________________________ Date: __________________________ Semester ApprovalApproval Field Coordinator: _____________________________________ Date: ___________________________

Strongly Disagree. 1An evaluating summary rating of 1.0 – 3.49 may result in one of more of the following: [ ] Non re-hire. Did not have time [ ] Suspension or termination of reemployment preference and privileges. [ ] Development of a written plan for improvement by the xxxx/director or designee. [ ] A follow-up evaluation in a subsequent semester. An opportunity to adequately assess student discuss this evaluation has been afforded me. Yes ____ This student exhibited an eagerness to learn new things and accept responsibility for additional tasks. No ____ This student was well organizedI wish to comment on the attached sheet. Yes ____ This student completed agency paperwork in an accurate and timely fashion. No ____ This student demonstrated respect for clients, coworkers, and others with whom she/he interacted. ____ This student demonstrated respect for issues of diversity. ____ This student acted in a professional manner. ____ This student displayed values consistent with master’s level advanced generalist social work practitioner. ____ This student displayed values consistent with master’s level advanced generalist social work practice. ____ This student practiced in a manner consistent with the ethical standards of the social work profession. ____ This student showed a commitment to lifelong learning and continued professional development. ____ This student exhibited an awareness of how issues of social justice relate to advanced generalist social work practice. ____ This student displayed an understanding of advanced generalist social work practice in public social services ____ This student used evidence from the literature as well as the student’s own evaluations to inform her or his practice interventions. ____ If given the opportunity, I would recommend this student for employment in this agency. (NA=employment-based interventions) ____ If given the opportunity, I would recommend this student for employment in the field of social services. WRITTEN COMMENTS ON OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF STUDENT: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ Instructor/Evaluee Date Xxxx/Administrator Date ________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ Peer Evaluator Date Vice President Date ________________________________ __________________________________________ Peer Evaluator Date President Date Board Approved: November 7, 1995 Rev. 2/04 00-0000-000 Appendix X-00 XXXXXXXXX-XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX TEMPORARY CONTRACT FACULTY EVALUATION SUMMARY Instructor: ______________________ Date: _____________ Evaluation Period: ________________________ Student Evaluation: 1st Peer Evaluation: 2nd Peer Evaluation (Year 1-Year 4 only): Manager Evaluation: SUMMARY RATING POINTS (Total scores above) According to the evaluations of students, managers and peers, the instructor meets the standards for employment at this institution. 5 1 | . . . . . . . . | . . . . . . . . | . . . . . . . . | . . . . . . . . | Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree REVIEW COMMITTEE CHAIR RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY The Review Committee recommends that this instructor: [ ] Be continued as a temporary contract faculty member for the next academic year. (An evaluation summary rating of 1.0 – 3.49 shall constitute grounds for exercising either of the following recommendations.) [ ] Be continued as a temporary contract faculty member for the next academic year subject to the conditions as follows:. If rehired, an evaulation summary rating of 1.0 – 1.49 shall initiate a process whereby the Xxxx/Director and evaluee develop a written plan specifying the requirements for improvement and another evaluation to be conducted in two semesters following the semester in which the rating was incurred. An evaluation summary rating of 1.5 – 3.49 may initiate a process whereby the Xxxx/Director and evaluee develop a written plan specifying the requirements for improvement and another evaluation to be conducted in two semesters following the semester in which the rating was incurred. [ ] Not be rehired. (Attach narrative comments). This evaluation has been discussed with me. Yes ____ No ____ I wish to comment on the attached sheet. Yes ____ No ____ ________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ Instructor/Evaluee Date Xxxx/Administrator Date ________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Peer Evaluator Date Vice President Date ________________________________ __________________________________________ Peer Evaluator Date President Date Board Approved: 2/24/04 Rev. 2/04 00-0000-000 Appendix X-00 XXXXXXXXX-XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX X EMPORARY CONTRACT FACULTY EVALUATION SUMMARY Instructor: _________________________ Date: ______________ Evaluation Period: ________________________ Student Evaluation: 3.95 * 0.40 = 1.58 1st Peer Evaluation: 5.00 * 0.20 = 1.00 2nd Peer Evaluation: (Year 1-Year 4 only): 5.00 * 0.20 = 1.00 Manager Evaluation: 5.00 * 0.20 = 1.00 SUMMARY RATING POINTS (Total scores above) 4.58 According to the evaluations of students, managers and peers, the instructor meets the standards for employment at this institution. 5 1 | . .. . . . . . | . . . . . . . . | . . . . . . . . | . . . . . . . . | Strongly Agree 4.58 Strongly Disagree REVIEW COMMITTEE CHAIR RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY The Review Committee recommends that this instructor: [ ] Be continued as a temporary contract faculty member for the next academic year. (An evaluation summary rating of 1.0 – 3.49 shall constitute grounds for exercising either of the following recommendations). [ ] Be continued as a temporary contract faculty member for the next academic year subject to the conditions as follows: If rehired, an evaulation summary rating of 1.0 – 1.49 shall initiate a process whereby the Xxxx/Director and evaluee develop a written plan specifying the requirements for improvement and another evaluation to be conducted in two semesters following the semester in which the rating was incurred. An evaluation summary rating of 1.5 – 3.49 may initiate a process whereby the Xxxx/Director and evaluee develop a written plan specifying the requirements for improvement and another evaluation to be conducted in two semesters following the semester in which the rating was incurred [ ] Not be rehired. (Attach narrative comments). This evaluation has been discussed with me. Yes ____ No ____ I wish to comment on the attached sheet. Yes ____ No ____ ________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Instructor/Evaluee Date Xxxx/Administrator Date ________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ Peer Evaluator Date Vice President Date ________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Signature Page Educational Contract Tasks completed Peer Evaluator Date President Date Rev. 2/04 Board Approved: 2/24/04 04-0816-002W Appendix I-1 BASE REASSIGNED TIME FORMULA FOR INSTRUCTIONAL DEPARTMENT CHAIRS AND COORDINATORS LED # Full-Time Faculty 2-3 .01 4-10 .02 11-15 .04 16-20 .06 # Part-time 1-4 .05 5-11 .10 12-26 .20 27-39 .30 40 -64 .40 65+ .45 Classified Regular FTE 0.5-2 .01 3-5 .02 5+ .03 # Sections 1-23 .025 24-75 .10 76-100 .15 101-125 .20 .25 151-175 .30 .35 226+ .40 Representation (Number of Programs) 1 .0025 2-3 .005 4+ .0075 Budget (Includes Hourly Student and Approved Student: ____________________________________________ Date: _________________________ Field Instructor: _____________________________________ Date: __________________________ 5,000 – 25,999 .025 Short-term salary 26,000 – 49,999 .050 Budget under the 50,000 – 99,999 .075 direction of the 100,000 + .10 Chair/Coord.) Rev. 2/04 00-0000-000 Appendix I-2 BASE REASSIGNED TIME FORMULA FOR NON-CLASSROOM CHAIRS AND COORDINATORS LED # Full-Time Faculty Liaison: _____________________________________ Date: __________________________ Mid2-Term Evaluation Completed and Approved Student: ____________________________________________ Date: _________________________ Field Instructor: _____________________________________ Date: __________________________ Faculty Liaison: _____________________________________ Date: __________________________ Final Evaluation Completed and Approved Student: ____________________________________________ Date: _________________________ Field Instructor: _____________________________________ Date: __________________________ Faculty Liaison: _____________________________________ Date: __________________________ Semester Approval3 .01 4-10 .02 11-15 .04 16-20 .06 # Part-time 0-4 .05 5-11 .10 12-26 .20 27-39 .30 40-64 .40 65+ .45 Classified Regular FTE 0-2 .01 3-5 .02 5+ .03

Strongly Disagree. 1An evaluation summary rating of 1.0 – 1.49 shall initiate a process whereby the xxxx/director and evaluee develop a written plan specifying the requirements for improvement and another evaluation to be conducted in two semesters following the semester in which the rating was incurred. Did not have time An evaluation summary rating of 1.5 – 3.49 may initiate whereby the xxxx/director and evaluee develop a written plan specifying the requirements for improvement and another evaluation to adequately assess student be conducted in two semesters following the semester the rating was incurred. This evaluation has been discussed with me. Yes ____ This student exhibited an eagerness to learn new things and accept responsibility for additional tasks. No ____ This student was well organizedI wish to comment on the attached sheet. Yes ____ This student completed agency paperwork in an accurate and timely fashion. No ____ This student demonstrated respect for clients, coworkers, and others with whom she/he interacted. ____ This student demonstrated respect for issues of diversity. ____ This student acted in a professional manner. ____ This student displayed values consistent with master’s level advanced generalist social work practitioner. ____ This student displayed values consistent with master’s level advanced generalist social work practice. ____ This student practiced in a manner consistent with the ethical standards of the social work profession. ____ This student showed a commitment to lifelong learning and continued professional development. ____ This student exhibited an awareness of how issues of social justice relate to advanced generalist social work practice. ____ This student displayed an understanding of advanced generalist social work practice in public social services ____ This student used evidence from the literature as well as the student’s own evaluations to inform her or his practice interventions. ____ If given the opportunity, I would recommend this student for employment in this agency. (NA=employment-based interventions) ____ If given the opportunity, I would recommend this student for employment in the field of social services. WRITTEN COMMENTS ON OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF STUDENT: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ Instructor/Evaluee Date Xxxx/Administrator Date ________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ Peer Evaluator Date Vice President Date ________________________________ __________________________________________ Peer Evaluator Date President Date Board Approved: November 7, 1995 00-0000-000 Rev. 2/04 Appendix X-00 XXXXXXXXX-XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX PART-TIME FACULTY EVALUATION SUMMARY Instructor: _________________________ Date: _____________ Evaluation Period: ________________________ Student Evaluation: Peer Evaluation: Manager Evaluation: SUMMARY RATING POINTS (Total scores above) According to the evaluations of students, managers and peers, the instructor meets the standards for employment at this institution. 5 1 | . . . . . . . . | . . . . . . . . | . . . . . . . . | . . . . . . . . | Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree An evaluating summary rating of 1.0 – 3.49 may result in one of more of the following: [ ] Non re-hire. [ ] Suspension or termination of reemployment preference and privileges. [ ] Development of a written plan for improvement by the xxxx/director or designee. [ ] A follow-up evaluation in a subsequent semester. An opportunity to discuss this evaluation has been afforded me. Yes ____ No ____ I wish to comment on the attached sheet. Yes ____ No ____ ________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ Instructor/Evaluee Date Xxxx/Administrator Date ________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Peer Evaluator Date Vice President Date ________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Signature Page Educational Contract Tasks completed and Approved StudentPeer Evaluator Date President Date Board Approved: ___________________November 7, 1995 Rev. 2/04 00-0000-000 Appendix H-39 A ppendix X-00 XXXXXXXXX-XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX PART-TIME FACULTY EVALUATION SUMMARY Instructor: _________________________ Date: _________________________ Field InstructorEvaluation Period: _____________________________________ DateStudent Evaluation: __________________________ Faculty Liaison3.08 * 0.40 = 1.23 Peer Evaluation: _____________________________________ Date4.00 * 0.30 = 1.20 Manager Evaluation: __________________________ Mid-Term Evaluation Completed 3.00 * 0.30 = 0.90 SUMMARY RATING POINTS (Total scores above) 3.33 According to the evaluations of students, managers and Approved Student: ____________________________________________ Date: _________________________ Field Instructor: _____________________________________ Date: __________________________ Faculty Liaison: _____________________________________ Date: __________________________ Final Evaluation Completed and Approved Student: ____________________________________________ Date: _________________________ Field Instructor: _____________________________________ Date: __________________________ Faculty Liaison: _____________________________________ Date: __________________________ Semester Approvalpeers, the instructor meets the standards for employment at this institution. 5 1 | . . . . . . . . | . . . . . . . . | . . . . . . . . | . . . . . . . . |