Stay of Litigation. The Parties agree that upon the execution of this Agreement the litigation shall be stayed, except to effectuate the terms of this Agreement. The Parties further agree that upon the signing of this Agreement that pursuant to CCP section 583.330 to extend the date to bring a case to trial under CCP section 583.310 for the entire period of this settlement process. Dated: 11/30/2022 XXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXX By: (Signature) DocuSign Envelope ID: 7BF4E2F8-D94D-43CA-A2F0-9AC691A792C6 Dated: XXXXX XXXXXXXX, INC. Approved as to form only: By: Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, President Dated: December , 2022 XXXX XXXXX, APLC 11/30/2022 By: Xxxx X. Xxxxx Attorneys for Plaintiff XXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXX Dated: December , 2022 XXXXXXX XXXXXX & XXXX, LLP By: Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxx Attorneys for Defendant XXXXX XXXXXXXX, INC. DocuSign Envelope ID: 7BF4E2F8-D94D-43CA-A2F0-9AC691A792C6 EXHIBIT A CLASS NOTICE COURT APPROVED NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR FINAL COURT APPROVAL Xxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, an individual on behalf of himself and others similarly situated v. Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Inc., and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive California Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles Case No. 21STCV02998 Filed January 25, 2021 The Superior Court for the State of California authorized this Notice. Read it carefully! It’s not junk mail, spam, an advertisement, or solicitation by a lawyer. You are not being sued. You may be eligible to receive money from an employee class action lawsuit (“Action”)against Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Inc. doing business as “Central Roofing Company” (“CTI”) for alleged wage and hour violations. The Action was filed by a former CTI employee Xxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx (“Plaintiff”) and seeks payment of (1) back wages for a class of non-exempt, non- supervisory roofers (“Class Members”) who worked for CTI during the Class Period (January 25, 2017, to December 28, 2022); . The proposed Settlement is a Class Settlement requiring CTI to fund Individual Class Payments. Based on CTI’s records, and the Parties’ current assumptions, your Individual Class Payment is estimated to be $ (less withholding). The actual amount you may receive likely will be different and will depend on a number of factors. The above estimates are based on CTI’s records showing that you worked workweeks during the Class Period. If you believe that you worked more workweeks during this period, you can submit a challenge by the deadline date. See Section 4 of this Notice. The Court has already preliminarily approved ...

Stay of Litigation. Stockholder and Company agree to stay all activities in the Lawsuits until the Termination Time, including, without limitation, refraining from seeking any discovery, filing any motions or amendments to pleadings or previous motions, and to further postpone any deadlines, discovery cut-offs, response dates, or similar matters which have not expired prior to the date of this Agreement. Stockholder and Company shall cooperate in taking all reasonable steps to ensure a stay of all activities in the Lawsuits and to ensure that the Lawsuits, to the extent within the control of Stockholder and Company, remain inactive in all respects involving Stockholder and Company. If not previously dismissed prior to the Effective Time, all Lawsuits will be dismissed with prejudice promptly following the Effective Time.

See All (12)

Stay of Litigation. All proceedings in the Litigation, other than those related to approval of the Settlement Agreement, are hereby stayed. Further, any actions brought by Settlement Class Members concerning the Released Claims are hereby enjoined and stayed pending Final Approval of the Settlement Agreement.

See All (10)

Stay of Litigation. The Parties agree that upon the execution of this Agreement the litigation shall be stayed, except to effectuate the terms of this Agreement. The Parties further agree upon the signing of this Agreement, pursuant to CCP section 583.330, to extend the date to bring a case to trial under CCP section 583.310 for the entire period of this settlement process. 11/8/2022 Plaintiff For QNAP, Inc. 11/8/2022 11-15-2022 Counsel For Plaintiff Counsel For QNAP, Inc. COURT APPROVED NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR FINAL COURT APPROVAL Xxxxxx Xxx x. QNAP, Inc., Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. 19PSCV000668 The Superior Court for the State of California authorized this Notice. Read it carefully! It’s not junk mail, spam, an advertisement, or solicitation by a lawyer. You are not being sued. You may be eligible to receive money from an employee class action lawsuit (“Action”) against QNAP, Inc. (“QNAP” or “Defendant”) for alleged wage and hour violations. The Action was filed by a former QNAP employee Xxxxxx Xxx (“Plaintiff”) and seeks payment of (1) back wages and penalties for a class of non-exempt employees (“Class Members”) who worked for QNAP during the Class Period (July 26, 2015 to October 28, 2020); and (2) penalties under the California Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”) for all non-exempt employees who worked for QNAP, Inc. during the PAGA Period (May 22, 2018, to [DATE OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL]) (“Aggrieved Employees”). The proposed Settlement has two main parts: (1) a Class Settlement requiring QNAP to fund Individual Class Payments, and (2) a PAGA Settlement requiring QNAP to fund Individual PAGA Payments and pay penalties to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency (“LWDA”). Based on QNAP’s records, and the Parties’ current assumptions, your Individual Class Payment is estimated to be $ (less withholding) and your Individual PAGA Payment is estimated to be $ . The actual amount you may receive likely will be different and will depend on a number of factors. (If no amount is stated for your Individual PAGA Payment, then according to XXXX’s records you are not eligible for an Individual PAGA Payment under the Settlement because you didn’t work during the PAGA Period.) The above estimates are based on QNAP’s records showing that you worked workweeks during the Class Period and you worked pay periods during the PAGA Period. If you believe that you worked more during either period, you can submit achallenge by the dea...

See All (10)

Stay of Litigation. The Parties agree that upon the execution of this Agreement the litigation shall be stayed, except to effectuate the terms of this Agreement. The Parties further agree that upon the signing of this Agreement that pursuant to CCP section 583.330 to extend the date to bring a case to trial under CCP section 583.310 for the entire period of this settlement process. DATED: August 16, 2023 LABOR LAW PC By: Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiffs XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX DATED: August 16, 2023 XXXXXXXXXX NORDREHAUG XXXXXXX XXXXXXX LLP By: Xxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Attorneys for Plaintiffs XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX DATED: August 16, 2023 BOKHOUR LAW GROUP By: Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Attorneys for Plaintiff XXXXX XXXXXXX DATED: August 16, 2023 XXXXXXX XXXXX, P.C. By: Xxx Xxxxxx, Esq. Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Attorneys for Defendant BAMIA 2, LLC PLAINTIFF XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX By: Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Plaintiff PLAINTIFF XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX By: Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Plaintiff DATED: August 16, 2023 DATED: August 16, 2023 DATED: August 16, 2023 PLAINTIFF XXXXX XXXXXXX By: Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Plaintiff BAMIA 2, LLC DATED: August 16, 2023 By: COURT APPROVED NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR FINAL COURT APPROVAL Xxxx Xxxxxxx v. REEF Global, Inc., Bamia 2, LLC, and Reef Technology, Inc., Case Number 21STCV37585 The Superior Court for the State of California authorized this Notice. Read it carefully! It’s not junk mail, spam, an advertisement, or solicitation by a lawyer. You are not being sued. You may be eligible to receive money from an employee class action lawsuit (“Action”) against Bamia 2, LLC (abbreviate name; “DEFENDANT” is used herein as a placeholder) for alleged wage and hour violations. The Action was filed by former DEFENDANT employees Xxxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, and Xxxxx Xxxxxxx (“Plaintiffs”) and seeks payment of (1) back wages and other relief for a class of hourly employees (“Class Members”) who worked for DEFENDANT during the Class Period (October 28, 2017, through February 16, 2023); and (2) penalties under the California Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”) for all hourly employees who worked for DEFENDANT during the PAGA Period (August 4, 2020, through February 16, 2023) (“Aggrieved Employees”). The proposed Settlement has two main parts: (1) a Class Settlement requiring DEFENDANT to fund Individual Class Payments, and (2) a PAGA Settlement requiring DEFENDANT to fund Individual PAGA P...

See All (9)

Stay of Litigation. The Parties agree upon the execution of this Agreement the litigation shall be stayed, except to effectuate the terms of this Agreement. The Parties further agree that upon the signing of this Agreement that pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 583.330 to extend the date to bring a case to trial under Code of Civil Procedure section

See All (8)

See All (6)

Stay of Litigation. The Parties agree that upon the execution of this Agreement the litigation shall be stayed, except to effectuate the terms of this Agreement. The Parties further agree that upon the signing of this Agreement that pursuant to CCP section 583.330 to extend the date to bring a case to trial under CCP section 583.310 for the entire period of this settlement process. Dated: _ Plaintiff Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Dated: _ Xxxxxx Xxxxx for: Defendant Northern California InAlliance Dated: _ Defendant Xxxxxx Xxxxx Dated: CROSNER LEGAL, PC Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Esq. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Esq. Xxxxx Xxxx, Esq. Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Class XXXXX, XXXXXX & XXXX, LLP Dated: 2/9/2023 X. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Attorneys for Defendants COURT APPROVED NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR FINAL COURT APPROVAL Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx v. Northern California InAlliance, et al., Sacramento County Superior Court, Case No. 00-0000-00000000 The Superior Court for the State of California authorized this Notice. Read it carefully! solicitation by a lawyer. You are not being sued. Northern California InAlliance and Xxxxxx Xxxxx Defendants violations. The Action was filed by a former employee, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx , and seeks payment of (1) unpaid minimum and overtime wages, statutory penalties, business expense es and costs for a class of hourly Defendants during the Class Period (January 16, 2020, through December 20, 2022); and (2) penalties under the California Private Attorney General Act hourly employees who worked for Defendants during the PAGA Period (January 16, 2020, through December 20, 2022 The proposed Settlement has two main parts: (1) a Class Settlement requiring Defendants to fund Individual Class Payments, and (2) a PAGA Settlement requiring Defendants to fund Individual PAGA Payments and pay penalties to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency Based on Defendants Payment is estimated to be $ (less withholding) and your Individual PAGA Payment is estimated to be $ . The actual amount you may receive likely will be different and will depend on a number of factors. The above estimates are based on Defendants workweeks during the Class Period and you worked pay periods during the PAGA Period. If you believe that you worked more workweeks during either period, you can submit a challenge by the deadline date. See Section 4 of this Notice. The Court has already preliminarily approved the proposed Settlement and approved this Notice. The Court has not yet d...

See All (4)

Stay of Litigation Sample Clauses

Filter & Search

Related Clauses

Parent Clauses

Sub-Clauses