Standard for Review Sample Clauses

Standard for Review. Unless this Agreement specifically provides that a Party’s Review and Approval Rights may be exercised in the sole discretion of the Reviewing Party, then in connection with exercising its Review and Approval Rights under any provision of this Agreement, and whether or not specifically provided in any such provision, the Reviewing Party covenants and agrees to act in good faith, with due diligence, and in a fair and commercially reasonable manner in its capacity as Reviewing Party with regard to each and all of its Review and Approval Rights and to not unreasonably withhold, condition or delay its Approval of, consent to or confirmation of any submission or determination. The Reviewing Party shall review the matter submitted in writing and shall promptly (but in any event within fifteen (15) days after such receipt) give Notice to the Submitting Party of the Reviewing Party’s comments resulting from such review and, if the matter is one that requires Approval or confirmation pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, such Approval, confirmation, disapproval or failure to confirm, setting forth in detail the Reviewing Party’s reasons for any disapproval or failure to confirm. Any failure to respond within the foregoing fifteen (15) day period shall be deemed to be an approval or confirmation of the matter submitted. Unless otherwise provided herein, the Reviewing Party’s right to disapprove or not confirm any matter submitted to it for Approval or confirmation and to which this Section 7.12(b) applies shall be limited to the elements thereof:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (18)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Standard for Review. The City's review and approval of any submissions by Developer will not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. The City will review any plans, plat or other filing by Developer in accordance with the applicable City's ordinances, state law and this Agreement. If any submittal is not approved, the City will provide written comments to Developer specifying in detail all of the changes that will be required for the approval of the submittal.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
Standard for Review. To authorize access to surveillance data, the Superintendent/President, Vice President of Administrative Services, or Chief Human Resources Officer shall review the request and ensure that the request to access surveillance data complies with the terms of this Article.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
Standard for Review. Unless this Agreement specifically provides that a Party’s Review and Approval or Consent Rights may be exercised in the sole discretion of the Reviewing Party, then in connection with exercising its Review and Approval or Consent Rights under any provision of this Agreement, and whether or not specifically provided in any such provision, the Reviewing Party covenants and agrees to act in good faith, with due diligence, and in a fair and commercially reasonable manner in its capacity as Reviewing Party with regard to each and all of its Review and Approval or Consent Rights and to not unreasonably withhold, condition or delay its Approval of, consent to or confirmation of any submission or determination. The Reviewing Party shall review the matter submitted in writing and shall give notice within five (5) Business Days to the Submitting Party of the Reviewing Party’s comments including Approval, confirmation, disapproval or failure to confirm, as applicable. Any failure to respond within such five (5) Business Day period shall be deemed to be an approval or confirmation of the matter submitted.
Sample 1Sample 2
Standard for Review. Unless this Developer Agreement specifically provides that a Party’s Review and Approval or Consent Rights shall be exercised in its reasonable discretion, all of such Review and Approval or Consent Rights under this Developer Agreement may be exercised in such Party’s sole and absolute discretion. The Submitting Party shall use reasonable efforts to cause any matter submitted to the Reviewing Party by the Submitting Party and with respect to which the Reviewing Party has Review and Approval or Consent Rights under this Developer Agreement to be submitted under cover of a request which (i) contains the heading or caption “TIME SENSITIVE - REQUEST FOR REVIEW/APPROVAL OR CONSENT” (or similar phrase), (ii) states the date of submission to the Reviewing Party by the Submitting Party (but which date shall ultimately be determined in accordance with Section 5 of Appendix B), (iii) states the date by which a response is required under the terms of this Developer Agreement (to the extent a specific response time is required pursuant to the terms hereof as opposed to the general requirements of this Section 10.3.2), (iv) identifies the provision of this Developer Agreement pursuant to which such Review and Approval or Consent is sought and (v) identifies (by document or drawing title, identifying number and revision date. or other clear descriptor) all enclosures to such request with respect to which Review and Approval or Consent is then being sought. The Reviewing Party shall review the same and shall use its reasonable efforts to approve or inform the Submitting Party in writing of the need for additional review time and/or materials within seven (7) calendar days of receipt. Further, the Reviewing Party will make reasonable efforts to accommodate urgent or emergency requests during construction.
Sample 1
Standard for Review. The City's review and approval of any submissions by Owner will not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. The City will review any plans, plat or other filing by Owner in accordance with the applicable City's ordinances, state law and this Agreement. If any submittal is not approved, the City will provide written comments within 60 days to Owner specifying in detail all of the changes that will be required for the approval of the submittal; if the City decides not to provide comments within 60 days of the filing of the application, permit or approval sought by the Owner will be deemed approved.
Sample 1
Standard for Review. The City's review and approval of any submissions by Owner will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. The City will review any plans, plat or other filing by Owner in accordance with the applicable City's ordinances, state law and this Agreement. Therefore, the City agrees that it will comply with all statutory and internal City time frames for development reviews. If any submittal is not approved, the City will provide written comments to Owner specifying in detail all of the changes that will be required for the approval of the submittal. Owner shall provide documents or information necessary for such approval. If Owner fails to provide the specified documents or information within 45 days of the City’s written request, the application of the submittal shall expire.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Standard for Review. Unless this Agreement specifically provides that a Party’s Review and Approval or Consent Rights may be exercised in the sole discretion of the Reviewing Party, then in connection with exercising its Review and Approval or Consent Rights under any provision of this Agreement, and whether or not specifically provided in any such provision, the Reviewing Party covenants and agrees to act in good faith, with due diligence, and in a fair and commercially reasonable manner in its capacity as Reviewing Party with regard to each and all of its Review and Approval or Consent Rights and to not unreasonably withhold, condition or delay its Approval of, consent to or confirmation of any submission or determination. The Reviewing Party shall review the matter submitted in writing and shall give notice within five
Sample 1
Standard for Review 
Sample 1Sample 2

Related to Standard for Review

  • Standard of Review The Parties acknowledge and agree that the standard of review for any avoidance, breach, rejection, termination or other cessation of performance of or changes to any portion of this integrated, non-severable Agreement (as described in Section 22) over which FERC has jurisdiction, whether proposed by Seller, by Buyer, by a non-party of, by FERC acting sua sponte shall be the “public interest” standard of review set forth in United Gas Pipe Line Co. v.

  • GUIDELINES FOR REVIEWS We may provide you areas on the Site to leave reviews or ratings. When posting a review, you must comply with the following criteria:

  • Scope of Review I conducted my review in accordance with Thai Standard on Review Engagements 2410, “Review of Interim Financial Information Performed by the Independent Auditor of the Entity.” A review of interim financial information consists of making inquires, primarily of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters, and applying analytical and other review procedures. A review is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with Thai Standards on Auditing and consequently does not enable me to obtain assurance that I would become aware of all significant matters that might be identified in an audit. Accordingly, I do not express an audit opinion.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • REQUEST FOR REVIEW Within sixty (60) days after receiving notice from the Plan Administrator that a claim has been denied (in part or all of the claim), then claimant (or their duly authorized representative) may file with the Plan Administrator, a written request for a review of the denial of the claim. The claimant (or his duly authorized representative) shall then have the opportunity to submit written comments, documents, records and other information relating to the claim. The Plan Administrator shall also provide the claimant, upon request and free of charge, reasonable access to, and copies of, all documents, records and other information relevant (as defined in applicable ERISA regulations) to the claimant’s claim for benefits.

  • Duration of Review This Articulation Agreement shall be effective from the date of affixing signatures and is subject to annual review by all parties affixing signatures. Any changes must be written and reflected in a new agreement. If no changes are indicated by the annual review, continuance of this agreement will remain in effect until terminated. Either party may terminate this agreement immediately without cause on 90 days written notice. In the event this agreement is terminated, students who are impacted shall have the opportunity to obtain credit according to the terms herein. Morehead State University ( MSU ) Responsibilities MSU shall be responsible for: ● Ensuring all institutional policies apply to articulated credit courses. ● Ensuring articulated credit is properly documented on postsecondary transcript in accordance with this agreement. ● Providing KDE with current postsecondary primary point of contact information to be published for general inquiries related to this Articulation Agreement and notifying KDE when updates are applicable. Secondary School (K-12) Responsibilities Secondary School (K-12) shall be responsible for: ● Providing detailed information to students in writing (i.e., a syllabus) consistent with the public postsecondary institution policy, which shall include the nature of the course and the expectations and requirements that correspond to its official catalog description. Course requirement information must include course prerequisites, course content, grading policy, attendance requirements, course completion requirements, performance standards, information on adding and dropping courses and other related course information. ● Promoting articulated credit opportunities among qualified high school students, parents and high school faculty. ● Ensuring proper Technical Education Data System (TEDS) data entry is maintained to allow for student testing. ● Ensuring articulated credit documentation (e.g., high school transcript with state course codes identified, CTE EOP assessment certificate(s), industry certification certificate(s)) is provided to the student upon meeting requirements. This document was completed by: bdavis Digitally signed by bdavis Date: 2018.12.10 14:14:21 -05'00' Articulation Agreement Kentucky Department of Education And Xxxxxxxx State University In Reference to Production Crop Career and Technical Education End-of-Program Assessment Agreement Number: AG - 18-19 - 0008 Signature Page The Kentucky Department of Education (KDE) and Morehead State University ( MSU ) enter into this Articulation Agreement on this 10 day of December , 20 18 . This Articulation Agreement shall be effective from the date of affixing signatures and is subject to annual review by all parties affixing signatures. Any changes must be written and reflected in a new agreement. If no changes are indicated by the annual review, continuance of this agreement will remain in effect until terminated. Either party may terminate this agreement immediately for cause or may terminate without cause on 90 days written notice. In the event this agreement is terminated, students who are impacted shall have the opportunity to obtain credit according to the terms herein. In testimony thereof, witness the duly authorized signatures of the parties hereto: Kentucky Department of Education Xxxxx X. Xxxxx, Ph.D. Commissioner of Education Date Morehead State University signed by Xxx Xxxxxx 1/3/2019

  • PROCEDURES FOR EVALUATION A. The evaluations of school year employees covered by this agreement shall be completed no later than May 30 of each school year for 9-month employees and by June 30 for 10/12-month employees. The evaluation shall be reviewed with the employee, with a copy given to the employee at the conclusion of the review. An employee may present written comments, which shall be attached to the written evaluation document. The evaluator and employee shall sign the evaluation document. The employee’s signature does not constitute approval or disapproval, but only that the evaluation has been reviewed with the employee.

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES A. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by AGREEMENT, shall be reviewed by LOCAL AGENCY’S Chief Financial Officer.

  • Criteria for Evaluation Criteria for employee performance review shall be made available to the employee before the start of the evaluation period and shall remain unchanged during the evaluation period unless the employee is made aware of the changes.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 9. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan. SCHEDULE 5

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.