Stakeholder Involvement Sample Clauses

Stakeholder Involvement. Overall Stakeholder In volvement Public Input/Access to EMS Information

Stakeholder Involvement. The Stakeholder Involvement Plan (SIP), Appendix B - Stakeholder Involvement Plan for PPG XL Project, is intended to supplement previous activities and describe the basic method by which additional input can continue to be solicited and received throughout the duration of the Project. Stakeholder input will also help to further develop the program specifics and evaluate Project performance. Most of the new product development activities will occur at PPG R&D centers located in the Pittsburgh, PA area. PPG is reaching out to interested local and national environmental groups and local affected communities. Further, PPG’s public communication committee will keep Stakeholders informed of any significant activities related to this proposal. Public meetings will be held to inform the general public about the Project and to invite their comments and participation. The first public meeting was held on July 27, 2000, in Pittsburgh, PA, to introduce the public to the Project and the Agreement development process. Other public meetings may be held during implementation of the Agreement based on public interest or as decided by the direct participants. Public meeting locations will be chosen to provide adequate size and accessibility to all who wish to attend. Stakeholder input has been and will continue to be considered throughout implementation of the Project. PPG will maintain and update the SIP, if needed, to provide for continued Stakeholder involvement over the duration of this XL Project.

Stakeholder Involvement. The Project is a key component of the Port’s adopted Rail Enhancement Program, developed with community engagement and in collaboration with the Port of Los Angeles (POLA) and the Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority (ACTA) as well as railroad stakeholders: Pacific Harbor Line (PHL), Union Pacific Railroad (UP), and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway (BNSF). Through multiple, coordinated rail planning efforts, the current bottleneck at Ocean Boulevard was identified as a priority rail network deficiency that could cause significant train delay and level-of- service issues if unaddressed. The Project is the product of years of stakeholder planning and collaboration. Regular updates to freight rail planning documents, including the San ▇▇▇▇▇ Bay Ports Rail Study and POLB Rail Primer document continued stakeholder interest and feedback related to the Project. Stakeholders that participated in the planning and preliminary design of the Project include terminal operators, the Port of Los Angeles, logistics partners, and railroad agencies. This collaborative process allows for the early identification of stakeholder needs and priorities. Announcements and updates for projects to improve the port-wide rail network, including the Project, are regularly presented at industry group meetings as in the Rail Action Planning Committee. Members of this diverse group include railroad operators and agencies, marine terminal operators, port complexes, and shipping lines. This form of stakeholder engagement allows the Port to share information and solicit input about the Project, while spreading awareness of new port initiatives, port rail project updates, supply chain optimization tools and freight rail efficiencies. Stakeholder coordination through the Rail Action Planning Committee for the Fourth Track at Ocean will continue throughout the project, and regular meetings will be conducted. The Rail Action Planning Committee was officially established in 2005, and has been meeting on a near quarterly basis. The Rail Action Planning Committee will continue to meet after this project reaches completion, and if needed, any relevant updates related to this project will be brought up at the Committee. Stakeholder involvement does not end at the planning or design phase. Railroad operators like PHL and the end users including terminal operators in Pier E, G and J will remain engaged in the Project, and especially during construction. These terminal operators include Long Be...

Stakeholder Involvement. Stakeholder involvement in the adaptive resource management process is through multi-stakeholder collaborative planning efforts. The focus for such multi-stakeholder collaborative planning efforts shall be through ongoing collaborative work of the COPWRR CROP initiative. The COPWRR CROP collaborative efforts have been focused on including stakeholders whose interests align with place-based (Central Oregon) and issue-based (wildlfire risk reduction) issues. It is the intent of this MOU to continue with and build on the COPWRR CROP collaboration and ensure that all interested stakeholders in projects developed under this MOU can be included in collaborative planning efforts. For example, stakeholders for projects developed under this MOU have been identified as generally falling within four categories, but are not limited to such categories: (1) federal, state and local governments/agencies and community organizations within or proximate to a project area; (2) environmental organizations with special interest and expertise in forest and ecosystem management in the geographic scope of project; (3) industry, including lumber ▇▇▇▇▇ and forest contractors that operate within or proximate to the program area; and (4) organizations with a focus on sustainable economic development and job creation. It is anticipated that collaborative planning shall focus on two major categories: (1) project planning and (2) environmental monitoring. These collaborative efforts will be organized around an information-based planning model and will assist in the development of phased implementation, project identification, development of project protocols, and development of environmental monitoring protocols, implementation and reporting.

Stakeholder Involvement. 5.2.2.1.1 It is proposed to use a diverse range of methods to ensure effective community involvement throughout the Plan process while complying with the requirements of the Regulations. Engagement with stakeholders will be the principal on-going method of involvement during the preparation of the plan. 5.2.2.1.2 Stakeholders will be provided with information via the RLDP website (and other methods where required) and comments, observations and input will be invited at all relevant plan preparation stages. The opportunity to discuss issues with staff will be made available via electronic communication or phone, and in person if appropriate or on request, subject to any currently prevailing Covid-19 restrictions. 5.2.2.1.3 Identified key stakeholders will be involved more closely in discussions about the plan vision, objectives and strategy in Key Stakeholder Group (KSG) events to be held live, on-line or in person as appropriate on at least two occasions prior to the Deposit consultation, enabling involvement of interested parties in the setting and definition of the plan's overall approach, desired objectives and outcomes and preferred strategy. 5.2.2.1.4 In addition, it is proposed to set up Technical Working Groups (TWGs) for specific subject or topic areas, which will comprise of Council officers and targeted stakeholders with expertise or interest in the topic area concerned. This will enable stakeholders to be fully involved in more detailed identification of the key issues in respect of specific policy matters that face the County Borough, and development of strategies and approaches to address these as appropriate.

Stakeholder Involvement. Stakeholder involvement is essential for the success of an ecosystem-wide environmental program. PSNS will sponsor an ambitious effort to involve local stakeholders in the development of this project (Section VII Stakeholder Involvement Process). During Phase I of this project PSNS will form a Community Working Group (CWG). The CWG will help establish goals for the future of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Inlet and act as information liaisons for communicating project information to their represented organizations or communities. In Phase II all interested stakeholders will be invited to help develop the tools indicated by the technical phase of this project. Over the next two years or so, we estimate that CWG members would need to be able to spend 6 to 8 hours annually. During phase two participation will be closer to 8 hrs per month for several months running. Stakeholders include any agency, organization, or individual that is involved in or is affected by the decisions made in the management of the watershed. This can include, but not be limited to, Bremerton and Port Orchard Publicly-Owned Treatment Works, Suquamish Tribe, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, University of Washington, and state and federal regulatory agencies mentioned above, as well as other interest groups and private citizens. As part of the stakeholder involvement, PSNS will issue press releases, run informational notices in the newspaper, and sponsor public meetings, which began with the initial FPA “kickoff” meeting on June 15, 2000. At this meeting, PSNS discussed the proposed pilot project and EPA explained the Project XL process. PSNS in partnership with the EPA and WDOE will hold additional public meetings based on public interest or as decided by the direct participants to advise interested members of the public on the progress being made on the project. The goal of this effort is to ensure that concerns and issues related to the project are documented and addressed.

Stakeholder Involvement. The Agencies agree to coordinate and conduct required federal and state public review processes concurrently when possible. Stakeholders must have an opportunity for meaningful involvement in the design and evaluation of IAs. The Agencies agree that each agency will participate, as appropriate, in the stakeholder involvement process for each IA. The Agencies will work to develop a system for identifying Clean Utah! and NEPT facilities so that all Agency program officials will be aware of a participant’s status. The Agencies will work to ensure that each participant’s alternative compliance requirements are measurable by means comparable to the current requirements and that relevant participant information is accessible to the public and regulators. Modifications, renewals, or proposed terminations of an IA will be discussed between the Agencies prior to Utah DEQ or EPA making a final decision on such actions. A termination review will automatically be triggered and participation in Clean Utah! and/or NEPT may be terminated by either of the Agencies under any of, but not limited to, the following circumstances: ▪ Enactment or promulgation of any environmental law or regulation after the execution of an IA, that renders the project illegal or legally, technically, or economically impracticable.

Stakeholder Involvement. Success in implementing stormwater improvements in a SMED will be partly and, in particular cases, largely dependent on effective involvement and participation of key stakeholders. An effective strategy for identifying and coordinating with key stakeholders in a SMED is required.

Stakeholder Involvement. Overall Stakeholder Involvement