Stakeholder Involvement. Stakeholder involvement in the adaptive resource management process is through multi-stakeholder collaborative planning efforts. The focus for such multi-stakeholder collaborative planning efforts shall be through ongoing collaborative work of the COPWRR CROP initiative. The COPWRR CROP collaborative efforts have been focused on including stakeholders whose interests align with place-based (Central Oregon) and issue-based (wildlfire risk reduction) issues. It is the intent of this MOU to continue with and build on the COPWRR CROP collaboration and ensure that all interested stakeholders in projects developed under this MOU can be included in collaborative planning efforts. For example, stakeholders for projects developed under this MOU have been identified as generally falling within four categories, but are not limited to such categories: (1) federal, state and local governments/agencies and community organizations within or proximate to a project area; (2) environmental organizations with special interest and expertise in forest and ecosystem management in the geographic scope of project; (3) industry, including lumber xxxxx and forest contractors that operate within or proximate to the program area; and (4) organizations with a focus on sustainable economic development and job creation. It is anticipated that collaborative planning shall focus on two major categories:
Stakeholder Involvement. Overall Stakeholder In volvement This project, if successful, will affect several hundred individual egg producing facilities around the country. The success of the project is also heavily dependent on decisions by individual States to develop general permits for this industry. EPA can and will encourage States to do so, but cannot compel them to do so. For these reasons, a traditional stakeholder involvement plan like those developed for most XL projects, is not appropriate. However, stakeholder involvement is a central xxxxx of the project and will be accomplished at several levels as follows: Project Workgroup -- the workgroup, led by UEP, includes a diverse set of stakeholders. These include egg producers, UEP staff, State and federal agencies, non-governmental organizations, and others. This workgroup developed all elements of the program described in the body of this Agreement and are prepared to support its implementation. The workgroup will also review the remaining elements of the program to be developed by UEP, as described in Section II of this Agreement. State General Permits as individual States develop general permits for egg producers, these permits will be available for public comment and input from the public before they are issued. Local Stakeholder Involvement Most importantly, stakeholder involvement will take place at the local level as facilities develop their EMSs and undergo 3rd party audits. As described earlier, facilities will communicate and take input from local stakeholder on an ongoing basis as their EMS is developed and implemented over time. Information on the results of EMS audits will be made available to regulatory authorities and key local stakeholders as part of the process of submitting a Notice of Intent (NOI) for coverage under general permits. As EMS implementation occurs, facilities will address issues raised by local stakeholders. Finally, all information from follow-up audits to ensure continued implementation of the EMS will be publicly available. Public Input/Access to EMS Information Facilities developing and implementing EMSs will work closely with local stakeholders and share information with them throughout the process, consistent with the commitment each facility has made through the Code of Good Environmental Practice. Specifically, this communication will take place in the following ways:
Stakeholder Involvement. 5.2.2.1.1 It is proposed to use a diverse range of methods to ensure effective community involvement throughout the Plan process while complying with the requirements of the Regulations. Engagement with stakeholders will be the principal on-going method of involvement during the preparation of the plan.
Stakeholder Involvement. The Stakeholder Involvement Plan (SIP), Appendix B - Stakeholder Involvement Plan for PPG XL Project, is intended to supplement previous activities and describe the basic method by which additional input can continue to be solicited and received throughout the duration of the Project. Stakeholder input will also help to further develop the program specifics and evaluate Project performance. Most of the new product development activities will occur at PPG R&D centers located in the Pittsburgh, PA area. PPG is reaching out to interested local and national environmental groups and local affected communities. Further, PPG’s public communication committee will keep Stakeholders informed of any significant activities related to this proposal. Public meetings will be held to inform the general public about the Project and to invite their comments and participation. The first public meeting was held on July 27, 2000, in Pittsburgh, PA, to introduce the public to the Project and the Agreement development process. Other public meetings may be held during implementation of the Agreement based on public interest or as decided by the direct participants. Public meeting locations will be chosen to provide adequate size and accessibility to all who wish to attend. Stakeholder input has been and will continue to be considered throughout implementation of the Project. PPG will maintain and update the SIP, if needed, to provide for continued Stakeholder involvement over the duration of this XL Project.
Stakeholder Involvement. The Project is a key component of the Port’s adopted Rail Enhancement Program, developed with community engagement and in collaboration with the Port of Los Angeles (POLA) and the Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority (ACTA) as well as railroad stakeholders: Pacific Harbor Line (PHL), Union Pacific Railroad (UP), and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway (BNSF). Through multiple, coordinated rail planning efforts, the current bottleneck at Ocean Boulevard was identified as a priority rail network deficiency that could cause significant train delay and level-of- service issues if unaddressed. The Project is the product of years of stakeholder planning and collaboration. Regular updates to freight rail planning documents, including the San Xxxxx Bay Ports Rail Study and POLB Rail Primer document continued stakeholder interest and feedback related to the Project. Stakeholders that participated in the planning and preliminary design of the Project include terminal operators, the Port of Los Angeles, logistics partners, and railroad agencies. This collaborative process allows for the early identification of stakeholder needs and priorities. Announcements and updates for projects to improve the port-wide rail network, including the Project, are regularly presented at industry group meetings as in the Rail Action Planning Committee. Members of this diverse group include railroad operators and agencies, marine terminal operators, port complexes, and shipping lines. This form of stakeholder engagement allows the Port to share information and solicit input about the Project, while spreading awareness of new port initiatives, port rail project updates, supply chain optimization tools and freight rail efficiencies. Stakeholder coordination through the Rail Action Planning Committee for the Fourth Track at Ocean will continue throughout the project, and regular meetings will be conducted. The Rail Action Planning Committee was officially established in 2005, and has been meeting on a near quarterly basis. The Rail Action Planning Committee will continue to meet after this project reaches completion, and if needed, any relevant updates related to this project will be brought up at the Committee. Stakeholder involvement does not end at the planning or design phase. Railroad operators like PHL and the end users including terminal operators in Pier E, G and J will remain engaged in the Project, and especially during construction. These terminal operators include Long Be...
Stakeholder Involvement. Stakeholder involvement is essential for the success of an ecosystem-wide environmental program. PSNS will sponsor an ambitious effort to involve local stakeholders in the development of this project (Section VII Stakeholder Involvement Process). During Phase I of this project PSNS will form a Community Working Group (CWG). The CWG will help establish goals for the future of Xxxxxxxx Inlet and act as information liaisons for communicating project information to their represented organizations or communities. In Phase II all interested stakeholders will be invited to help develop the tools indicated by the technical phase of this project. Over the next two years or so, we estimate that CWG members would need to be able to spend 6 to 8 hours annually. During phase two participation will be closer to 8 hrs per month for several months running. Stakeholders include any agency, organization, or individual that is involved in or is affected by the decisions made in the management of the watershed. This can include, but not be limited to, Bremerton and Port Orchard Publicly-Owned Treatment Works, Suquamish Tribe, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, University of Washington, and state and federal regulatory agencies mentioned above, as well as other interest groups and private citizens. As part of the stakeholder involvement, PSNS will issue press releases, run informational notices in the newspaper, and sponsor public meetings, which began with the initial FPA “kickoff” meeting on June 15, 2000. At this meeting, PSNS discussed the proposed pilot project and EPA explained the Project XL process. PSNS in partnership with the EPA and WDOE will hold additional public meetings based on public interest or as decided by the direct participants to advise interested members of the public on the progress being made on the project. The goal of this effort is to ensure that concerns and issues related to the project are documented and addressed.
Stakeholder Involvement. Prior or current experience in a senior leadership position in stakeholder involvement; and
Stakeholder Involvement. The Contractor shall seek out and consider any input from stakeholders in designing and managing the behavioral health delivery system. The Contractor shall provide information to advocacy organizations and other stakeholders regarding outcomes and status of services delivered to children.
Stakeholder Involvement. Success in implementing stormwater improvements in a SMED will be partly and, in particular cases, largely dependent on effective involvement and participation of key stakeholders. An effective strategy for identifying and coordinating with key stakeholders in a SMED is required.
Stakeholder Involvement. In order to make the necessary change to the service provision in Lochgelly Health Centre, it was key to have the support of key stakeholders from NHS staff and also leaders from the local community. Key NHS stakeholders were identified to create the vision for change and to ensure that the vision can be communicated to all who will be impacted by the change. It was recognised as important to have support from those who have an emotional commitment to the services provided in their community. These stakeholders were invited to take part in key events e.g. Option Appraisal Exercises , AEDET and Design Statement workshops, to ensure that all opinions could be shared and a consensus on the best way forward could be agreed. Appendix 2 records the stakeholder involvement.
